Wings At Canucks Recap ; Take It Easy ( 4-3Ls/o)
Ha, I bet you thought I was going to go with Don Henley and the rest of his bandmates for the entertainment tonight.
But I had a minor revelation while waiting for our servers to reboot, our flim flam to get calibrated, or whatever the hell happened! While out picking up some victuals, I had the TEAM in my ears. I missed a little bit, but pretty sure I heard from the first three callers various listings, mentions of, or somehow knocking Roberto Luongo.
Which is of course, absurd. So this is for them. You all remind me of Mrs Swan ( she is also Lois Griffin for you Family Guy fans ) with the nattering nabobs of negativity.
Lets get to the observations and illuminations after the break, shall we?
As often happens with a win or a loss in "big games", this one will be pointed to in some quarters as proof of how the Canucks are somehow deficient. I would wager that words like "they owned you" and whatnot of that regard would be the tenor of the conversation. Perhaps, if it is the regular season, some dig about how "the Canucks better not get to shootouts" will be thrown in. I am more of the opinion that this was a big game to win because of the places in the standings. There is still time to make that up, and the next four on the road ( Avs, Preds, Wild, Flames ) are all winnable. The next three at home after that are the not much more threatening ( Yotes, Avs, and that 4 pm start for our friends at the CBC for some team with blue unis and a Cup or few sometimes ago... before colour TV )
So, there are some winnable games in there to catch up to the Wings, who now lead the Canucks by 4, with the Vancouver team holding a game in hand. But that won't be the talk. Nor will a now 7-3-3 in the last thirteen while supposedly "sucking". You know you know someone that has pointed to periods of games the last thirteen. Its a long season, and we unreasonably expect absolute domination all the time. But the truth is, a lot of teams go through losing periods and not being on top of it. The Wings lost seven in a row earlier this season.
- I get that people love Cory Schneider. I am one of those people myself. But holy moly, golly gee whillickers, Mr Luongo sure has to deal with some Mrs. Swans out there. He singlehandedly keeps his team in the first, with 15 shots ( and probably 12 of them good scoring opportunities, including that glove on Bertuzzi early that would have made it a lot different ) in the first. The only goal to beat him was a Daniel Cleary shot that was the result of still more pressure, with Helm making a perfect screen in front. Never saw it.
- That was answered by a goal from our very own Michigan ( Michigan has the longest freshwater coastline of any political subdivision in the world, ) born players that was a perfect announcement of their intentions. David Booth was first to a puck ( as usual, we are getting to know ) and made a strong move on Kronwall to the net, taking two guys with him while Ryan Kesler held his ground and scored. That line, or any line Ryan Kesler was on tonight, was the best the Canucks had to offer. Of the 8 shots taken by the Canucks in a first period where it was those two and Mason Raymond ( Chris Higgins reportedly has the flu ) with 4, Kesler having 2.
- Yes, the game will be dissected and reflected on, but lets not forget that in addition to skill on skill, and there was an abundance of it, the home team came back three times while being outshot at a 2 to 1 margin for most the night. The first period that featured Luongo's numerous larcenies also featured some pushback late, even though the power plays were against the Canucks. The first penalty kill after a goal against was a bit unlucky for Edler, a bouncing puck handcuffing him and his swing at the puck taking down Datsyuk. That was a momentum swinger for sure. Then the one on Kesler ( for a crosscheck that broke his stick. I would posit that would not have been called if that does not happen ) late in the first, which also forced Luongo to be brilliant at times, was better, and the penalty kill deserves a lot of credit tonight for going 4 for 4 at the end of the night.
- This is all I am saying about the work of the officials ( and Klimmerly I remember for doing something in the early rounds of the playoffs that boggled the mind...vaguely though ) and Joanette ( who worked the last game and thought that Kronwall did not jump at all! ;-) have a very hard job. It is in their career advancement goals to be as unobtrusive and unbiased as possible. Its a tough game to officiate. But, while I understand the respect factor might be higher for the Wings than it is for our Canucks ( without getting at all into that steaming kettle of fish!), it sure seems like either the Wings are better at knowing where to just come to the line without going over it ( a very real possibility...the "old time hockey" folks just call that being tough to play against. ), or its worse than I thought, and we need to play it super fine because refs read toads like Damien Cox and the Teatown Media Mafia too.
Because I stopped counting after it got to tough to keep up with all the little tugs, hooks, interferences calls that impeded our greyhounds tonight. ( it is something to be admired, the way they step right up to the line ) Some might call that playoff officiating tonight. But it was pretty one sided. Or at least appeared that way. Case in point, in one five second span Burrows was tripped backwards by his check at the line. OK, its Burr, and he never gets the call anyhow...but at the end of that five seconds Manny Malhotra, who has to be one of the more respected players in the league, was making sure everything was OK while getting an errant stick in the face. Yet later on, a stick at least as lazy and careless rode up Zetterberg's stick and resulted in a penalty, Bieksa was sent off for the same damn thing. It gets frustrating for fans, of any team, when that happens. Though, its the Wings, so I guess we should call all that "gamesmanship", or "knows how to work the officials" and move on. You will never win that argument unless you wear a striped shirt, and as birthday boy Bertuzzi says " it is what it is". Moving on
- The faceoffs were in the Canucks end by about a three to one margin, if the SNET guys are to be trusted. The Wings even ended up with a 28-27 edge when all was said and done. Our best guys all sucked, Kesler going 4/14, Money a not quite money 6/13, and Lapierre just over .500 at 4/7. But that is easily explainable by the stat that Henrik Sedin was 12/17, and was often the first and/or second option with Manny Malhotra in the defensive zone all night. I don't remember more than one or two faceoffs in the Canucks end in the third that was lost, and about a similar number on the power plays, where the guys that relatively sucked like Kesler and Manny seemed to get most of their wins.
- Yes, the Sedins were split up in the third. Did it work? Well, the French Connection ( Lappy and Burr ) seemed to click, and a nice touch pass to Alex Burrows tied it up half way through the third. Mason Raymond ( who had an interesting night. He got danced around by Bert early, was double shifting after the Alberts as a fourth liner idea kerplunked, and was one of the guys making things happen all night, finishing with a goal and a shot, in 20:31 TOI ) got a bit of a lucky one, off of Stuart's leg to tie it up again with less than five minutes to go. The Kesler line might have been the best of that dominant 13-8 shot third. With Daniel Sedin subbing for Mase,they were dangerous and the first line, while Henrik with Cody Hodgson and Mason Raymond seemed to be finding a little something as well. Hansen was a better fit with Lapierre and Burrows on more of a crash line, and they pressed at times too. Hell, even the Manny, Weise and Raymond redux line had a few moments.
- Its a shame that the goal that got the Wings to O/T in a period where they sat on their lead a little too much was on a broken play. After an easy save, Aaron Rome thought Luongo could read his intentions as he tried to get him the puck to freeze. He had time to dump it to the corner, or even off the far glass on his forehand and out. But instead, the move seemed to momentarily flummox the Canucks best player tonight, and the puck sprang free to Drew Miller. He made a nice quick shot, but the whole play was a bit of a cluster you know what. It was one of maybe 3-4 half decent chances for the Wings, and not the best one. Not really Luongo's fault, and just like I am not blaming him for a gimmicky, made up way to arbitrarily end hockey games frisbee toss, bris, Rouchamboud, shootout, I am not blaming him for this goal that much. The way I look at it, the Canucks are not going to miss the playoffs or even risk losing the division because of a few shootouts lost. They are not in the playoffs, they should play 3-3 for another 4 minutes of an 8 minute period like the Wings GM suggested, and hockey should decide hockey games, not airline schedules. ( I would bet the amount of shootouts would drop by over 50% ) Again, Roberto Luongo was the only reason his team was in it to dominate the third period.
- So, in a game the Canucks were badly outplayed in two of three periods ( I thought the second was better than the first ), they came back three times, withstood a loss of a player at the last moment that required juggling, and got a world class goaltending performance from the #1 'tender. What do you think will be the tenor of the discussion of this one as we voraciously chew through it like locusts before getting another nooner against the Avalanche? I am only guessing, but something tells me the Mrs. Swans will not be as kind.
- Last point tonight. Thank you, and fuck you Justin Abdelkader. Thank you for taking the fight with Maxim Lapierre ( and it was closer to a draw than the first one ), but fuck you for being a punk then, and probably still a punk now. Here's the clip. Check out who is down and covering up. Even though its Max, and you got "the drop", that is simply not cool.. How many shots is that? Punk move kid. ( homer announcer..."rope a dope my ass!") I bet Mike Babcock was happy that you answered the "code" tonight, being the olde timey hockey guy that he is at heart, but just because you answered the bell tonight does not mean you get a free, "get out of punk class" card. Oh, and damn you for being a solid fourth liner, who made the line go, having a couple hits in your 8:09, and contributing to the always underrated fourth line pressure that seems to roll over the lines when a team gets rolling. We have seen it often enough with our great team, we even saw it in the third tonight. We also saw the Wings play a same pinching style against us that we like to employ, at least in the first two periods before they decided to lay back...( "With my mind on my money and my money on my mind..." ) Its only three weeks before we get to watch the Annual Kesler Takes Over a Joe Louis Arena game in the final of the season series. Should be fun.
Who knows, by then, with the lineup of winnable games, it might be another game for first overall. Take it easy mon!
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Blake “You’re on the TEAM 1040”
Mrs Swan “Uhhhh,nnnooooo.” Luongo, he looka like a man..Uh noooo the red one"
Blake "Well yes, Luongo is the number one, but you have to love Schneider. Coming up, Blake and Donny will talk about the “goaltender controversy” on and off for the next two hours"
Mrs Swan …“uhhhh….noooooooooo”
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Are there seriously that many people down on Luongo after that?
THREE breakaways in the first period and his team was outshot by 18. I’m not sure how being the goaltender on a team that very well could have been down 4-0 after 20 minutes who gets them into a shootout isn’t good. I don’t know if Schneider would have been better in this one, but I know Luongo was damn good.
by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 3, 2012 5:22 AM PST reply actions
too many fans forget
the Garth Snow, Kevin Weekes, Dan Cloutier years and forget Luongo is the best goalie the Canucks have ever had. All they remember is his cap hit for 12 years.
Lead writer of nothing, commenter on everything.
by westy99 on Feb 3, 2012 6:24 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You’re not alone. Wings fans are doing that more and more often with Franzen, who is our best scorer since Fedorov. Either way, Luongo was spectacular last night and there is a reason he’s the starter for you guys: he’s the best goalie on the team. It’s an inside secret that the best goalie is your starter, so keep that quiet, will you?
by Apocalyptic0n3 on Feb 3, 2012 6:50 AM PST up reply actions
there are people who still think
Luongo singlehandedly lost the Finals for the Canucks. The education process is an ongoing thing. But if we can make Mark Spector see the light, anything is possible…
One of those jerks from Nucks Misconduct
@KentBaskyNM
Holy crap. Look at Rome!!- Sean Zandberg
Defense coverage
was brutal last night. The first period looked like we were on the PK, except when we were on the PK and could ice the puck.
Lead writer of nothing, commenter on everything.
oh..and anytime Alberts is a forward
is again a bad decision.
Lead writer of nothing, commenter on everything.
casual dan
was there for the first and part of the second, but then he brought his 5 buddies too.
"Planet Earth is blue, and there's nothing I can do."
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity. @Twitchy67
we broke
howard’s finger last night, he’s out for a couple.
"Planet Earth is blue, and there's nothing I can do."
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity. @Twitchy67
Howards' been playing out of his mind.
Conklin and McDonald suggests we have a pretty decent chance to creep up on Detroit in the standings.
Frequent visitor to Nucks Misconduct.
and our next few games are against the Avs, Preds, Wild and Flames.
yeah, we can do it.
Nucks Misconduct writer, ambassador and prima donna.
Note to self: there's always a dirty joke somewhere in there....
@NM_missy
Unless, of course, they decide to play down to the opponents again.
Frequent visitor to Nucks Misconduct.
by Vancouverguy on Feb 3, 2012 11:20 AM PST up reply actions
as long as we
can, y’know, turn in some 60 minute efforts for once. lol.
<3 Boobies!
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal
the home team came back three times while being outshot at a 2 to 1 margin for most the night
Very good point. We were not playing that well, especially for certain stretches, but we still managed to drag the game to a shootout. Not bad. Kind of a theme for the last while…pulling out wins and/or points when we weren’t playing our best. Kinda nice that we have team that still has a pretty good record (7-3-3) during a period when they didn’t always play very well.
That being said, I really would like to see the team sharpen up and go on a run. It’s been a few weeks now of sometimes iffy D, and I would love to see the Sedins find their magic and dominate again.
They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
#37 Ryp
Luongo
is a great goalie. If the Niemi of two years ago can win a cup with as bad as he was in the Finals then for sure Luongo can win a cup. Anyway, good game. You guys have to be happy with that game coming down to a skills competition considering the amount of things that didn’t go in the Canucks’ favor and that the Wings played one of their best road games of the season.
and
we can all enjoy that Chicago game right?
The Nucks are all alright!
Sure they’ve been not quite on game a bit but they are still performing and they’re still a dangerous team. And they will come out of these winter doldrums. Luo’s the man! and the team is just fine. We are sooooo lucky to have this team. And we are spoiled into unrealistic expectations sometimes.
Vancitydan thanks for the antidote to Team 1040 and the Twitter feeds.
"Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for." -Bob Marley
I get being critical cuz you want to win so bad
But this game was one where I just could not stomach the same old crap from Joe from Delta or whomever, bitching about the shootout
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
let me sum up basically 95% of the luongo hate after games like this
“HURRR DURR TRADE LUONGO”
There you go.
<3 Boobies!
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal
the thing is
they do things that just encourage the bastards.
Like Blake today is bemoaning that “shootouts will be important the rest of the way, look at all the s/o games in the last 4 DAYS!!!!”…said with an sturm and drang tone, and the same emphasis.
One will take the passive aggressive shot, the other defend it, and with a few callers and their hilarity, there you go, show filled.
They do orchestrate a bunch of it. It does not excuse Joe from Delta from his idiocy (FTR, I did not specifically hear a Joe from anywhere!)…but it does make it easier to discern and dismiss.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
of course they do
if you feed the trolls, they’ll keep coming back to listen more.
<3 Boobies!
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal
you're ulcer will appreciate it
when u come to the realization that the radio guys are playing a role, and that role is to entertain with unscripted callers. The best way to be entertaining with unscripted actors is to manipulate the conversation into the realm of the stupid. The easiest way to do that is to pander to the lowest common denominator. Hence, the radio show guys are just being good at their job, and the commentors are just being themselves. Think of a yahoo comment board…the only comments seem to be from the bottom of the gene pool….team 1040 is the same. Let the socially retarded vocal minority have their airtime!
"Planet Earth is blue, and there's nothing I can do."
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity. @Twitchy67
yep
I think the same thing.
I also reserve the right to mock them when they are especially mockworthy.
No ulcer here!
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
though
I do get annoyed when they do a “theme” ( say a totally made up “goaltending controversy” ) and it runs through every damn show of the day!
Lowest common denominator.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
ahem
YOUR ulcer
<3 Boobies!
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal
yeah well
YOU’RE ulcer will be happy when u stop being a typo nazi! :P
Seriously though…OOPS!
"Planet Earth is blue, and there's nothing I can do."
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity. @Twitchy67

by 
















