Canucks At Flames Recap ; Lucky? ( 3-2Ls/o)
I am not saying that the Flames are as lucky as the folks in the video above, but they really had no business getting two points from this game.
The Canucks maybe could have done better in the first, but apart from the Horak goal, they did not display much skill in this one until the shootout. But you know what? They got the two points, and they desperately needed them more than our guys. Maybe they will even make the playoffs. But unless Mikka Kiprusoff wins the Conn Smythe in the first round, they are not going that far. Sorry, thats just the truth, if this game is any indication. They got lucky on the first goal, took advantage of a mistake on the second, and then desperately dumped the puck out almost the entire third period. Whatever it takes, but this is not a loss for Canuck fans to kvetch about that much.
I'll try after the break though.
Please don't think that I am being arrogant Flames fans. If you watched the same game as me and decided that this was a huge win for your team that was because they were the better team, more power to you. The goaltender is part of the team, I always say, so maybe I should not judge so harshly. Good for you. I always hope as many Canadian teams get into the dance as possible.
- The Flames had 7 shots in the first, 5 in the second, and 6 in the third ( but for an Iginla breakaway and two half chances for Stajan late, that number would have been 3 ) period where they were in fall back to the net and be desperate mode. They did block 19 shots, with four guys ( Iginla, Butler, Bouma and Horak ) all getting 3 each. They did do a good job of defending in their own end, if you call being hemmed in for entire shifts where the change even occurred defending. It was the Mikka Kiprusoff show, with the help of a couple posts. The Canucks ended up with 31 shots, and had 12 to the 6 the Flames tallied in the third. So, they did pay the price for their "luck". But they were outplayed as far as I could see!
- The home team was in it early, and the game had a pretty good pace to start, with rushes at both ends and saves to be made ( more shots for the visitor than the home team early ). The game had some bite, as evidenced by Mike Duco continuing his audition for Dale Weise's spot by dropping the gloves with Bouma, where I am calling him the winner with the only real big connection of the whole tilt. A two on one off of a bouncing puck forced Luongo's first big save, to the "LUUUUUUs" of the growing number of Canuck fans that seem to find their way into the Saddledome these days.
- Poor Andrew Alberts. He did not have the very best game, but he was getting "the shaft" from the referees almost from the get go. After a fairly light, but I guess OK call on Alex Edler, the home team got a power play, from which they did not get too much, with only an easy Kalanos shot to trouble the goalie. But then the referees decided that Big Albert had boarded Horak, when it just did not look like the boarding calls made in the NHL these days. Whatever. The Canucks penalty kill was aggressive and disruptive the entire night, going 4 for 4. It killed these two penalties off well. It did give the Flames the appearance of some momentum, and they did have a few chances in their best period, the first.
- The goal just before that late penalty on Alberts, now THAT was lucky. Kevin Bieksa could have played Cammy a little tougher there, but the rebound off his first shot went in off the hand. It did provide a humorous episode though, as the lengthy video replay seemed to puzzle Craig Simpson, who immediately went into full rationalization mode to make sure that it was a good goal, completely ignoring the evidence the director was putting up on the screen multiple times that showed him directing the puck with his hand, seemingly anyhow. I guess there was not enough to overturn, but let me say this right now. If they ever team up Simpson and Mark Lee, I swear I am done with Hockey Night In Canada no matter who is on that night.
- The real fun started in the second though. After a nice play by Bouma caught Luongo looking the wrong way on his pass from behind, and a nice shot by Horak made it 2-0, the Canucks did what they did for most the game, went back on the attack. Andrew Alberts went to step up on that pressure at the blue line. He may have been guilty of charging. Maybe. ( no arm was up at that time at all ) The call was not made until Comeau was laying on the ice. Look, I don't want to see folks hurt, even players from Calgary, but the kid just fell into that hit. The officials did not make that call at the time correctly at all, but it wont be the last time a seeming "injury" drew a call. Lastly, Mikeal Backlund, don't go to the guy that threw the "hit" and bump them after the whistle if you do not want that to happen. Alberts may have gotten the drop on the young man, but he should have never put himself in a position to be injured in a fight. He is not a fighter. Jackman is. Perhaps you noticed that from the room Mr Backlund, when he challenged Alberts, who obliged him. Not knowing your role just cost your team that is battling for the playoffs a centre for who knows how long. But the game was ON after all the angst and emoting...
- Mr Tanguay, you had an OK game, I guess. But ignorance of whether an icing is occurring is no excuse. The linesman had his arm up, and I am sure someone yelled what they always do. It set loose the best looking power play of the night for either team, and the Canucks somehow did not put one in the net, despite the first unit throwing it around and getting shooting chances all over the place. Of the 8 shots taken on it, only 3 hit the net, and two of them were in close backhands from Kesler and Henrik that really should have found the back of the net. Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, right?
- The pressure that was taking over this game and forcing the Flames to play desperate defense was finally able to cash in late in the second, with Cody Hodgson showing a good nose for the net by finding a puck and backhanding it home to make the score 2-1. It also saw Mike Duco get rewarded for sticking his nose in with an assist. Cody Franchise only saw 10:21 TOI this night , on 16 shifts, and 1:39 of that was on the power play. But he had 16 shifts, and was only 2 for 7 on faceoffs. We all know how "situational" AV is. The tying goal from Booth came the same way, with pressure. That shot for a lefty is a tough one too.
- The Canuck power play could have won this game for them. That they did not was because of, after a first power play that looked awesome, the second one was not. The third one was very short, and only because Scott Hannan is a diver. Everyone saw that but the officials. Simpson said it might have been an even up call after the Bouwmeester penalty on Kevin Bieksa ( on an amazing rush that he could have scored on, but for Kipper ), but that was more of his "good old Alberta boy" bullshit. Simpson is a pitchman in both Edmonton and Calgary for local ads, and lives there. I get it. Played for the Oilers. But the guy sure sounds like a cheerleader sometimes. It was a dive Craig. Period, pure and simple. Daniel Sedin even called him on it. Hell, you even admitted as much yourself. Don't try to take a real penalty off the board.( J'Bo had both arms around his guy twice) and excuse a dive as an 'even up that is the right thing". Its never the right thing to do that. Hockey fans just want the calls made on the ice, not like that. Perhaps on the next HNIC broadcast you can cheerlead for us, huh? Or, even better, just call the game.
- The shootout, well, sometimes you win the coin flip, sometimes you don't ( not like the NFL, where the NFC has won 15 straight coin flips in the Sup Bowl. WYF? Perhaps one of our "math masters" here can calculate the odds on that.). Joke-inen made a great move and beat Luongo five hole. That is his "move", much like Burrows forehand fake, go to backhand. Its almost all he does though. I thought a guy that studies the game as much as Lui would have picked up on it. Maybe its like Burr's move. When you do it right, it does not matter. Burrows scored by not going to his "move", and Lui made a decent save on Tanguay trying to challenge his inner "Forsberg". I don't really blame Lui for getting beat on the multitude of dekes that Iggy threw at him for the shootout winner. But really Mason Raymond. If you have the spinarama in your arsenal, use it more. It has not been stopped yet. You did not even go out wide to make the goalie think you were going to use it! But, its a skills competition to decide a game arbitrarily. Meh.
- See, here's a stat that I will point to that makes me think the Flames got lucky. They gave the puck away 8-2 in the first, and ended up being 15-7 in that stat at the end of the game. The hits and faceoffs ( 13-12 Van and 30-29 Van respectively ) were fairly even, but the Canucks just could not do enough with those turnovers to make them pay.
- The Sedins generated a helluva lot of chances and pressure, but I thought they could have been more dominant against a team they usually own. Even after they saw Alex Burrows join their line after about half the game, they seemed to get even more chances, but not have the finish. Perhaps I am being to critical though. They generated a lot tonight, especially late, and the Flames deserve the credit for breaking up that pressure by preventing the last pass from getting there cleanly. They sure set up Edler for a bunch of shots. He led the team with 6 of his 8 on net. Hank and Danny had 2 each on net, but they also missed 2 and 1 respectively. The team as a whole missed 19 shots today. I know some of those ( for instance, Hamhuis missed four ) are on purpose to be a pass off the boards. But that is 10 more than the Flames missed, and was another example of the dominance of the visitors tonight.
- Lastly, Mike Cammalleri had a goal, and 5 shots on goal. He was probably the best he has been since the trade. But he just seems like a square peg in a round hole. A lot of those shots were one and done. Perhaps I am just not seeing it, but if that is the guy that is going to make the difference, then I don't know. I hope you make the playoffs because you are Canadian Calgary. But thats it. Honestly, this team will make the playoffs if Jarome Iginla wills them over the finish line. Yes, I know that the Flames have won 2 straight against the Canucks. Yey shootouts. I also know that this team is not as good as the one I cheer for. Sorry Flames fans. Like the calling of this a "lucky" win, I just didn't see enough from your team to make me think any more of them than I did before this one.
No offense.
98 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks
I was being a bit of an ass.
I think its actually the secret clause in the AFL/NFL merger that “Thats just the way it goes down”…NFC gets the ball first!
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
But the probability of being able to find
some strange sequence of events that seem to defy probability calculations by looking at all the events in the world with hind sight approaches 1. :-)
Missed the game
but after reading the recaps I sure like the drive the Canucks have shown in the third period this year.
Pretty much my thoughts
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
good goalies steal games
and even for teams that are bloody awful, this can happen if you don’t play a 60 minute game. whatever. bring the boys home.
One of those jerks from Nucks Misconduct
@KentBaskyNM
Who knows, maybe he’s just sick of interviews and figures this is as good an excuse as any to ask for a media blackout. Or maybe he’s just a stupid douche. Either or. - Twitchy on TeaPartyTimmy
That exactly what I thought
I was thinking that while they were winning games they had no business winning. That eventually it all catches up. Better now than in April.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 10:40 AM PST up reply actions
I was at this game
Several bad riot jokes, too many Bruins jerseys, lots of “go Canucks go” chants, and one guy standing up and pretending to “dive” the whole game..but it was fun anyways!
did you do the same pretend "dive" when big tough
Scott Hannan dove like a BAWSSSS in O/T?
Because that was the worst dive I saw the entire game.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
I don't know that was a dive
His leg kinda buckled when Danks stick hit his skate
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 10:38 AM PST up reply actions
look at it again
Daniel stick “hitting” his skate is a bit light. He skated into a stick held with one hand that was dropped.
He dove…come on man. I get being the what you are saying, but he dove.
The other clue is when even mild mannered Daniel “Clark Kent” Sedin called him on it and Hannan started trying to rough him up to…what, take his team off that advantage.
I get it was an even up, and is my most hated part of the two ref system ( I think they should go to one with some form of video assist ). Ref A disagreed with Ref B’s call on J’Bo. The players ( cagey vets like Hannan ) know whats what and will try it at the right time too.
Even guys that don’t usually dive. I believe the coach and scouts mark the box beside “does whatever it takes to win” on those one.
His legs buckled because he is a shitty actor ! ;-)
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Yes
that was a beautiful dive. Hannan did it perfectly. The fact that he was trying to rough up Henrik, who called the dive, and embarrassed him, just shows how he was trying to hide his embarrassment.
I can understand him though. Sometimes, when you play a team that is superior, you have to cheat, in order to have a chance for a win. The Flames cheated, and it worked. It won’t work for long, though.
Los Angeles, CA
Lucky is the best and only way to describe this win for Flames fans. But, we’ll take it for sure. When you’re dressing a glorified AHL team laden with waiver pickups and replacement level players, that’s how you win games… hope you capitalize on a few chances and get great goaltending. If you’ve seen them play at all since the Boston Massacre, this is what they’ve been doing. It’s been working of late, but that type of play generally has a short shelf-life. Kipper’s right post may have been the first star of this one! (Although I remember a couple of posts the other way too!)
"Well, we're gonna need all hands on deck if we're gonna go to Regionals!"
@MG_mslepp
thats from "Bring It On" right?
The Boston Massacre, I like that. I have seen a few games what with the Canucks being off CBC recently, and saw them on TSN too…they have been playing much better since then.
The San Jose game a good indicator of that.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
lol… the quote is from ‘Community’. A pretty funny episode making fun of glee clubs.
"Well, we're gonna need all hands on deck if we're gonna go to Regionals!"
@MG_mslepp
Yes!
That’s why I said what is regionals, but I’m sure you got that. That show is gold, too bad it’s on “hiatus”
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 9:58 PM PST up reply actions
3 on 3
Anyone else have the thought while watching that 3 on 3 that it creates the most boring hockey imaginable. I know there’s some talk of going from 4 on 4 to 3 on 3 but after watching both teams just skate around in big circles waiting for an opening I hope they never try it.
don't you think
the coaches would figure that out? The Sedins and AV could find a lot of angles with that much space.
Four on four does seem to open the game the best though, but I think the 3 on 3 could be fun if the coaches worked on that more…it just does not come up that much now, I imagine
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
I dunno
To me it looked like a case of too much room.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 11:51 AM PST up reply actions
might be right
it was not for that long, and maybe the Flames just wanted the short PP and get to shootout, but it did slow down…
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Yeah, it just looked like everyone was to afraid to make a move and then get burned. It didn’t really open up the play, just made everyone slow down.
They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
#37 Ryp
also
It took away the need to pass. It’s impossible to create pressure on the puck carrier with that much room out there. Especially someone with as nifty mittens as Hank has.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 11:58 AM PST up reply actions
One more thing
You hear that sound? It’s the sound of thousands of people jumping off the bandwagon in Chicago.
Take your pick




"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
They're actually pretty lucky
That the “race” for the last couple playoff spots has been more of a “who-wants-it-less” race. Everyone except for Pheonix has been pretty lacklustre recently
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
Depending who ends up in 8th
I feel like the hawks might be the worst playoff team. Zero defensive depth, terrible goaltending and suspect froward depth. Although I would suggest that the goaltending suddenly looking so terrible is a result of the lack of defensive depth.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 11:34 AM PST up reply actions
I think this movie was made by a Blackhawks fan

They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
#37 Ryp
But they're innocent!
Its all Crawford’s fault.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Tickets sold to the next home game. So sad :(

by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 11:49 AM PST up reply actions
Lol
I feel like a jerk, but it is kinda fun to tease.
The Hawks will get out of this funk soon I’m sure. They’ll be okay.
They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
#37 Ryp
If by soon
You mean in the next couple seasons but the depth that they lost doesn’t just pop up every year. From Ladd and brouwer to Campbell and niemi. You can’t just keep bleeding a team of talent and expect them not to regress.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 12:21 PM PST up reply actions
I’m more referring to their losing streak ‘funk’.
They definitely have issues on D, special teams, and goaltending that aren’t going to be solved this season.
They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
"To make our way, we must have firm resolve, persistence, tenacity. We must gear ourselves to work hard all the way. We can never let up." -Ralph Bunche
don't buy that at all...
the only player of those four that I’d have back in a heartbeat is Soupy.. but his contract was just unworkable. There’s more than enough talent and depth on the Hawks to win that oversized-vase-thing. Why it’s not working right now is, of course a whole other kettle of poissons.. I’m pretty much out of ideas there..
"It could be worse: there could be blood squirtin' out of your nose"
"And that's 'Perfessr Mrs. Montador' to you...
by mightymike D on Feb 12, 2012 3:38 PM PST up reply actions
Really?
You don’t see how the hawks complete lack of depth is the only difference? I’m not sure how that’s a mystery to you hawk fans. When you replace high level NHL talent with AHL talent you aren’t as good. Pretty simple equation. I don’t know if there’s enough depth on the Hawks to make the playoffs, let alone win a cup.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 3:48 PM PST up reply actions
I guess
When a lot of fans didn’t watch hockey before 2009 they cant fully appreciate just how good that team was that won the cup and that assembling talent like that is not easy. I mean you had Ladd and versteeg on your third line ffs.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 3:57 PM PST up reply actions
I know how good that team was
as someone on SCH pointed out, it was Idiot-Proof.. but, sadly, in a Cap situation, also non-sustainable.. but I still think there’s more than enough talent there.. the bigger issue has been with players either not playing to their potential (Bickell, Frolik, Hjalmersson, Crawford) and general misuse of talent by the coaches (Stalberg, Leddy, Sharp).. and dressing John Scott, ever… I’ve managed to stay off the “Fire Q” bandwagon but.. something needs to change.
"It could be worse: there could be blood squirtin' out of your nose"
"And that's 'Perfessr Mrs. Montador' to you...
by mightymike D on Feb 12, 2012 4:20 PM PST up reply actions
Potential is the key
Those players showed some but they aren’t legit players for your franchise to lean on. For example, leddy just isn’t a top four NHL dman on a playoff team. As for the forwards, you know things are bad when you’re taking scraps from the Calgary Flames. I’m not sure why anyone would bother trading for a guy who can’t crack the lineups of two of the teams youre competing against. The problem in Chicago is not the coach, it’s the guy assembling the parts for the coach and the fact that he’s written this season off to some degree. By that I mean he left cap room available when there were players that could have helped and now there’s simply not. Unless he’s got some trick up his sleeve on deadline day but bowman seems far too conservative for that. Wheres dale tallon when you need him, huh?
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 4:36 PM PST up reply actions
Calgary pretty much stole 2 points last night. I thought we looked great, especially in the 3rd period. The Flames barely had the puck.
Kipprusoff was great though…he kept them in the game.
I have no complaints about last game, from a Canucks perspective.
They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
#37 Ryp
great review dan, as always
except (yeah yeah I know, there’s always an ‘except’ from me…it’s to keep you honest)… not sure why all the craig simpson hate. Let’s face it, that WAS a make up call, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Also, sorry, but I don’t know what game you were watching if you saw that puck directed in with the hand. Perhaps you watched the ‘hardcore homer’ version, cuz although I thought there actually was possibly a bit of kicking motion, it looked like a good goal to me; it would have been pretty hard to call that one off in good conscience. And you know how much I hate the flames…I hate the flames like tea partiers hate reason.
Seriously, I like craig simpson…and simpson and hughson at a vancouver vs calgary or edmonton game is about the perfect team, cuz while neither of them are outright cheerleaders, they each show a little bit of bias towards one of the teams. Simpson is one of the best all round color guys cuz his insights are about as good as they get. Maybe cassie campbell has as good hockey knowledge, but she’s kind of annoying to listen to (sorry cassie fans). Seriously, can you tell me you’d rather have Kevin very Weekes doing the color than craig simpson? If so I’d have to wonder about you a bit… Just saying…
"John Garrett food jokes are always good" - @notafullcolon
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity. @Twitchy67
I've looked a few times twitch
I think I missed that he humped it in, and it was not with the hand. What I was inferring there was that the way Simpson was going on and on about it being fine, when his director was showing that there was “something” that was giving T.O a bit of angst ( they looked at it a lot longer than it usually takes )…and he was just blithely ignoring that…that was what I found funny. It was a good goal because it was called as such, but the way he ignored it all was a bit funny to me.
Simpson is far from one of the best colour guys. And I totally disagree that Hughie is a homer for the Canucks. Thats just wrong. Just because he called them coming up does not mean he is as bad a homer as the guy that played for one Alberta team, and lives there and chearleads for those teams on a regular basis…its a lot farther down that path than Hughie is, but whatever, you know?
I would rather see Weekes with Hughie than Simpson. He is much more on it in regards to goalies ( that is another thing that annoys the hell out of me, how a guy like Simpson is so quick to “call out” goalies all the time ( on any show, not just Lui…he does it all the time. I watched a Reimer goal where it was not at all his fault, and he did almost two minutes on blaming him.
I just don’t like Simpson that much. Its over a long time, and it is not something lightly said. The guy is far too judgmental for me ..and frankly, he is an asshole a bit too much.
Weekes at least tries to find the positives. He needs some work on his announcer bonafides, but Simpson…he’s just too negative ( unless its one of “his teams”) for me.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Looked like a good goal to me. Lu makes a great first save but it unluckily bounces off cammarelli and back in the net. It all happened to fast to really be a kicking motion.
like I said
the goal was probably good. What I found annoying was the fact that he was nattering away about the refs like "how could they even look, and getting indignant almost that it was a goal…and here is three different angles up, and on two of them you see the hand move….
There was the appearance of at least “something”…and he did not even acknowledge that in his rush to sound “the man” I guess…but it was shitty colour commentating, because all they are supposed to do is add colour to the images we see, and there were the images explaining to anyone watching that ther might be “something” to talk about…instead of being a dick like he was.
Just my opinion though. I guess you can tell that Simpson is only above Mark Lee on my HNIC folks that annoy me…huh?
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
lol. I didn’t mind Simpson that much. To me Garrett is starting to get annoying. About the only things he says are “yes” or he talks about food. If you took a shot for everytime Garrett said yes, you’d probably be dead by the second period.
Garrett?
Really? Dude is on it, and breaks down goals and plays very well when the replay comes up.
With what happened, not his little fantasies of what happened, or his take on it that is skewed by petty dislikes for a certain player or team.
I know Cheech is a Canuck homer, and his little quirks can get a little annoying, but I prefer to think of him like a favorite uncle that everyone just shakes their heads at when he does “those things”.
Different strokes. Simpson is far too in love with his own opinion. He used to be OK, but I would say the last couple years anyhow, its either (dislike) did you see how he was…“insert negative here” OR (like) OH my this guy is so good at doing….“insert gushing positive here”.
I’ll take Cheech over that pompous ass any day! You can imagine he would be a ton of fun to have a beer with, whereas Simpson, I imagine, would spend a lot of time checking in the mirror behind the bar as to how the hair is doing…
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
I keep thinking of Hank passing the puck away when he was in a perfect shooting position in the 3rd. Then I think that Kipper would have stopped him anyway. You could see the look on Sutter’s face on After Hours. He was very pleased with Kipper’s game. Rightfully so.
Contributor at Nucks Misconduct
Fun game
Henrik is currently 32 points behind Linden for all time points lead. If he gets 91 points this year he’ll pass him. Currently he’s on pace for 86.4.
Do you think he makes it this year?
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
also, we’d better win a cup soon cuz having five retired numbers and no cups sounds silly.
by Passive Voice on Feb 12, 2012 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Six.
Barring a trade out of town, Luongo’s #1 will be up in the rafters when he hangs up the skates.
But yeah, we need to win at least one by the end of the Sedin era.
Lu?
I love Lu, but I don’t really expect his # to be retired.
The twins for sure though.
They once made a Kevin Bieksa toilet paper, but it wouldn't take shit from anybody.
"To make our way, we must have firm resolve, persistence, tenacity. We must gear ourselves to work hard all the way. We can never let up." -Ralph Bunche
Lou definitely. Best goalie in Canucks’ history
Contributor at Nucks Misconduct
by Sean Zandberg on Feb 12, 2012 6:54 PM PST up reply actions
given public opinion though, i’d be surprised if he gets it without winning a cup.
by Passive Voice on Feb 12, 2012 7:03 PM PST up reply actions
yeah, well the public are idiots. McLean and King Richard didn’t win it either. Long after Lou is gone people will realize what we had in Lou.
Contributor at Nucks Misconduct
by Sean Zandberg on Feb 12, 2012 8:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
This jersey retirement deal with the Sedins got me thinking: do they make it into the Hockey Hall of Fame?
Just for the fact they are twins
That won back to back art ross trophies probably gets them in the hall. They are the kind of players that people appreciate when they’re done too. A lot of reel type goals these last few years.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 11:30 PM PST up reply actions
actually it's not a slam dunk
They would need at least 400 more points, assuming they get those you gotta think they’ll get in.
by Canuckelhead on Feb 12, 2012 11:37 PM PST up reply actions
Also...hate rooting for any Philly team...
although one of my “man-crushes” is Phillies P Roy Halladay, what a stud
…but GO FLYERS! 1-1 after a pretty badly mishandled puck by MacDonald
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
Detroit gunning for 20th straight home win
Wings dominate early but a brutal giveaway by Joey MacDonald gives Brayden Schenn the easy tap in. 1-1.
"Either you give it right back or the next thing you know everyone and his brother will be trying you on for size." - Doug Harvey
what...the...
…GET OUT OF MY HEAD
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
Lol…both teams have goaltending issues, but at least Howard will be back for the Wings pretty soon.
"Either you give it right back or the next thing you know everyone and his brother will be trying you on for size." - Doug Harvey
by reggiedunlop on Feb 12, 2012 5:24 PM PST up reply actions
Howard has such a short fuse...
…it’s pretty ridiculous; his little spat with the Nucks, with the Blues with about a second left…he thinks every little tap against him is a personal attack
damn solid goalie though
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
Joey MacRebound..and what’s with Kronwall and his spinning ass hits?
"Either you give it right back or the next thing you know everyone and his brother will be trying you on for size." - Doug Harvey
by reggiedunlop on Feb 12, 2012 5:42 PM PST up reply actions
2-1 Flyers...
…another error by MacDonald, swiping away the rebound right to Schenn who goes top shelf
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
awww...don't be sad...
THE WALKING DEAD IS ON SOON!
haha…if you like zombies…personally I don’t give two shits about it…or one…or even half…or any fraction for that matter
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
are those in Canada...
obsessed with zombies are those in America? it really is absurd
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
Z-Berg..nice.
"Either you give it right back or the next thing you know everyone and his brother will be trying you on for size." - Doug Harvey
I did fantasy hockey in like 2004...
…I knew nothing about hockey, wasn’t a fan, didn’t know any of the players, I just picked the guys with the coolest sounding names…so of course I won my league!
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
There’s one more point for ya..and a nice one at that!
"Either you give it right back or the next thing you know everyone and his brother will be trying you on for size." - Doug Harvey
by reggiedunlop on Feb 12, 2012 6:29 PM PST up reply actions
yeah lol Zetterberg has been a bit disappointing this year but he seems to be picking it up :) 3 points tonight :)
Go Canucks Go!
I’d be surprised if the Flyers can pull this one out with Detroit having the extra rest day.
"Either you give it right back or the next thing you know everyone and his brother will be trying you on for size." - Doug Harvey
by reggiedunlop on Feb 12, 2012 6:49 PM PST up reply actions
ah
…I remember my first time…there was wine, candles, a beautiful dinner
oh…you meant for fantasy hockey…well good luck and I hope you make the playoffs!
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
hahahahaha
who doesn’t remember their first :P but I got none of that stuff :P
thanks :) I am strangely doing well in my league but things change :) and we are all pretty much new at this :)
Go Canucks Go!
well, not everyone can be a gentleman like me, I guess
…this is turning into a “Nucks Misconduct After Hours” talk ;)
not for the faint of heart!…haha…what Canucks are on your team? and since you are doing well I guess you have no Blue Jackets or Chicago or Tampa goalies on your team?
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
haha
nope none of those :) I have Kesler, Burr, Hamhuis and Ballard for Canucks. Rinne and Backstrom for goalies.
Go Canucks Go!
not bad not bad
"Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints

by 















