Tuesday's Numbers: Penalties, powerplays and playoffs
Well, the game on Saturday was certainly something, eh?
There was also a tremendous amount of chatter about how the game was called, that the Vancouver Canucks may have a chance against the Boston Bruins if there is a Stanley Cup rematch if the officials call the playoffs as tightly as the regular season.
Vancouver was a definite beneficiary of the officials on Saturday, with two top-six forwards being taken out of the game for Boston's side. Boston, however, beat the Canucks at even strength. As of this morning, Boston are a 54.6% possession team at home and the Canucks are 52.4% on the road, so the Canucks should expect to get beat in a rematch at evens in the Gardens.
The powerplay needs to come through, and if the powerplay gets its opportunities, it will come through. Going by official NHL.com boxscores, I pegged the Canucks powerplay at being 2/33 in the Stanley Cup Finals, so the team was obviously getting its chances. Maybe not 11 in a game, but consider that had the Canucks PP connected like it did in the regular season (24.3%) the Canucks would have had 8 powerplay goals in the series. They got 2. Six goals equals a win in hockey. Do the math.
*sigh*
Either way, the question I wanted to posit was "do the Canucks get their powerplay opportunities in the playoffs?" I went through the NHL.com box scores for every playoff game and sifted out all the penalties that were called after the five-minute mark of overtime. Generally, the conventional belief is that games are called a little tighter in the regular season, but I didn't quite find that when I looked through the numbers.
| PP/Game | PK/Game | Total | |
| Regular Season | 3.6 | 3.8 | 7.4 |
| Playoffs | 3.7 | 3.9 | 7.6 |
The Canucks got pretty much the same amount of powerplays and penalty kills in the regular season as they did in the playoffs. There really isn't any excuse for the Canucks PP to not be clicking. They will get the opportunities if they don't respond to Boston's physical brand of hockey (in the totally hypothetical situation they meet in the finals again. It's a fact that I'm taking for granted I guess).
I broke it up further, by round:
| PP/Game | PK/Game | Total | |
| Round 1 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Round 2 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 6.0 |
| Round 3 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 9.2 |
| Round 4 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 8.6 |
The totally tame Nashville series was balanced out instantly by the rough San Jose series, where all notions about Ben Eager being able to rough up the Sedins was put to bed because the Canucks powerplay was clicking.
Also, the referees were clearly against Vancouver in the Chicago series* but generally, the amount of penalties called is pretty similar. I'm not a huge fan NHL referees being predictable. You just know that a team that's had 4 penalties in a row will probably get the next powerplay, regardless of which team is committing the most infractions.
So, all the Canucks need to do is keep biting, whining and diving their way to the top. It's a method that will help them out in the playoffs as much as it does in the regular season.
*note to visiting Second City Hockey readers: I don't actually buy this
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
not bitching about you using it, really Cam
but the Canucks did not go 4 for 11 on the PP.
They went 4 for 7. The minutes were almost identical.
The 2 man counted as two, and the five minute major counted as three, because they scored twice.
Its been such a go to number, and the Canucks did have the advantage with the 2 man and the rightly called major.
But the 4 for 11 is a bit of a misnomer, no?
;-)
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
NHL.com has them at 4-for-11.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/boxscore.htm?id=2011020598&navid=sb:boxscore
NHL.com is the ultimate authority.
Drop at line at The Backhand Shelf or any of the fine Nations Network blogs: Canucks Army, Jets Nation, The Leafs Nation
@camcharron
That is how it is couched
because of the reasons I just gave you above.
But the reality is that the Bruins had an almost level amount of opportunity in that relation.
It was 4 for 7, in reality on the ice, but 4 for 11 on the stat sheet only….
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct
Stat-sheet is what I'm going by
You want to make sure all the data comes from the same source.
The 7 vs. 11 didn’t factor into the powerplay data I used in the post however, so it’s sorta moot regardless.
Also, you just explained why powerplay rates are pretty dumb to go with. It’s why I much prefer Shots/60 or Goals/60.
Drop at line at The Backhand Shelf or any of the fine Nations Network blogs: Canucks Army, Jets Nation, The Leafs Nation
@camcharron
good point on the "powerplay data"
Just one of those things…
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. I think he was a Canucks fan...
@Vancitydan Writer at Nucks Misconduct

by 


















