Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Is the Canuck Cupboard THAT Bare?


I do have to admit to being a bit surprised to read that our Vancouver Canucks rated #29 in the NHL, ahead of only the Sharks, according to an ESPN article.  Without their insider info ( because I absolutely refuse to pay for the right to hear Scott Burnside's POV ), the PD article  seems to say that the gist is that ESPN view our cupboard as pretty bare.  Let's explore that, and maybe find out something new about some of our kids, prospects, signings and whatnot after the jump.

Star-divide

 

 

Setting aside the fact it is ESPN, and just one of hundreds of scouts, a fellow named Grant Sonier ( I hope this is the same fellow, a minor league coach in the 90s. Probably became a scout too. I mean, how many Grant Soniers can there be?)

Anyhow, according the the PD blurb...

 

Like the Red Wings, the Canucks have seen their high draft picks limited by their contending for the President's Cup each year. Unlike Detroit, they have not found as much value elsewhere in the draft. And now the Canucks will feel it in their prospect pool. This year's selections -- forward Nicklas Jensen (29th overall) and goaltender David Honzik (71st overall) -- give them a chance to overcome their lack of depth. Jordan Schroeder(notes) (22nd overall, 2009) and Cody Hodgson(notes) (10th overall, 2008) are coming along slowly and cannot be counted out just yet.

Interesting that a system that boasts two players with boundless potential — Schroeder and Hodgson — could be ranked so low. Add in Anton Rodin, and while the Canucks only six top prospects by ESPN's count they might deserve a slightly higher ranking.

But this is about depth, and the Canucks aren't the deepest in the minor leagues ... with the potential forother busts like Sergei Shirokov. 

 

 

Now, maybe Mr Sonier goes into depth on why the cupboard is so bare.  I guess we can be happy they remembered Anton Rodin.  I guess its all relative with prospects, its not surprising that the Hawks ranked 4th will the deals they made during the fire sale.  I hear the Wings are also high in the rankings.  I guess I just distrust the article's veracity a bit, in that it seems they totally discount everyone not named Cody Hodgson and Jordan Schroeder, except to mention Niklas Jensen and David Honzik .

Now, I am not saying the Canucks system right now is Top 10.  But I do think that Mike Gillis has done a better drafting job than Mr Sonier thinks he has.  I also think he has excelled at using non traditional ways of finding young players.  The jury is still out on some of these young men, and more than a few may never lace them up in the NHL.  That is an NHL wide thing, not a Canucks thing.

 

So, let's look at a few of the fine young men GMMG has found.  With the help of the Interwebs, maybe we might learn something!

 

Steve Anthony - a highly regarded bantam and midget in Quebec, he fell to the Canucks in the 7th round, 187th in 2009.  We forget these guys are still kids, as his quotes in this quoted article show that he still struggles with his confidence ( and this is a guy as a kid that was being compared to Sidney Crosby ) His last year, he was a point a game player   throughout the season, and a +35 in the regular season over 61 games played. Sounds like he learned a lot as the Sea Dogs won the Memorial Cup this year.

Aaron Volpatti - another example of signing guys away from the draft process.  I hesitate to include him here, as he already has made an impact, even if briefly, at the NHL level.  GMMG signed him in March last year, and we all saw what his style can bring.  Personally, seeing as he is from one of my old home towns, I hope he makes the team next year.  More than likely will play for the Wolves, and become a fan favorite.  Really only included him here as an excuse to show this ( where he looks like Ryp' a bit ), and this ( where I was very impressed by how he came back after getting tagged ) and this (WHAT A HIT! ) and this.  

Darren Archibald - Jeff Angus gives us a great breakdown here, but it is hard to understand how this guy  ( lots of power in these highlights ) has been out there ( check out this goal linked there ) All I know is he got in 37 games with the Ice Dogs last year and scored 23 goals, had 36 points, and scored 10 more with 4 assists in 14 playoff games.  It seems the team was happy with him at the prospect camp.  maybe a guy to look for making the jump to main camp this fall?

Anton Rodin - one of the prospects actually mentioned in the ESPN article, he is also listed on Hockey Futures a the #2 prospect we have, just behind CoHo, ahead of Jordan Schroeder, Billy Sweatt, Kevin Connauton and Patrick McNally.  I went down that far because it should be noted how much of a crap shoot all these rating things are.  These guys list us as 27th, and all the guys I listed above are rated ahead of Chris Tanev by the website.  Has performed well for Sweden at the highest levels.  Should finally be in Canuck / Wolves family this season.

Jordan Schroeder - is the one that always makes me smirk when I read the projections from the "experts".  When he was drafted in '09 22nd overall. It was all the "experts" could do to not keep repeating themselves about the "steal of the draft".  When he came out of school and joined the Moose, and scored 4 goals and 9 points in 11 games, and then 3 more goals and 6 points in as many playoff games, smiles were wide on Griffiths Way.  The fact that his first full season as a pro saw a drop in production is not the worst thing in the world. It does not mean all the kid's talent evaporated. Check some of his highlights from last year.   Does that look like he has lost it? Count me as one that is still excited about seeing this kid in Blue and Green in the coming years 

Bill Sweatt - Lee Sweatt's little brother is always going to be a sentimental favorite for me.  I mean, we picked up him for nothing, he is a guy that decided he wanted to play with his bro' as a pro,( and while that never happened in the NHL, it did at the AHL level ), rejecting his hometown team, and laughing at the Leafs lowball and bluster when he said no. So, is the talent enough to live up to that kind of hype?  Well, in 10/11 in Manitoba, ( first full season as a pro ) he had 19 goals, 27 assists in 80 games, and added a goal and 5 assists in 14 playoff games ( and only one minor in the playoffs ).  Check some of his highlights. Goes to the net hard, not afraid of the physical play, both giving and taking, good hands in close, and fast as hell.  We are deep, but you have to like how this kid's game meshes with our team's style.  

 

So, there is six forwards with varying degrees of upside.  Fair enough, There are more, but lets stop there and take a peak at the blue line.  We all watched how every time a young guy came up for his chance he seemed to fit right in.  Let's look at the prospects on the blue line.

 

Peter Andersson - a 5th round pick in 2009, this young man joins a long history of drafting Swedish defensemen.  You can see from his page at Eliteprospects that he is not a big points guy, but plays a solid two way game, ( and, even without the points, it talks of his big shot and offensive prowess. Craig McTavish will have to work with the young man on making the simple play in his own end.  Won Bronze at the 09/10 WJT team for Sweden.  Good size at 6'3" and 194.

Sebastion Erixson - undrafted and signed this April , ( undoubtably because the best Swedish scout in the NHL, Thomas Gradin said we should ), this 21 year old has plenty of determination.  Some great quotes here on his desire to make our team this year, and willingness to play where he is asked if he doesn't. I like players with that kind of drive.  Plenty of skill, he will need to beef up the 5'11" and 185 lb frame to handle the physical play in the NHL.

Kevin Connauton - someone that you would think the ESPN folks noticed as well. A 3rd rounder in '09, the man only set records for points as a Giant in the WHL( his 24 goals and 72 points are franchise records ), and has produced at the AHL level as well.( albeit only 11 goals and 23 points in his 1st pro season, but some outstanding skill shown in some of the linked highlights ) His power play work and skating, poise and great first pass make him yet another of the young men that is knocking at the door on our blue line. Lot's of good info on his Wiki page here . Broke Jonathon Blum's goals record on the Giants, and hit 97 MPH in team's skill's comp this year.

Adam Polasek - this kid is one that I would have to point at as an example of a late round guy ( you know, like the Wings, right ESPN ? Not the only one either.  But I get the narrative. Wings good, Canucks bad, right? ;- ), the big Czech was a 5th rounder in '10.  His first year in North American hockey was with the PEI Rocket in the QMJHL in the 09/10 season ( stats and bio here ). Check out how he plants a guy and then with the inevitable fight, how he plants that guy too!  Will undoubtably be a Craig McTavish favorite, this year.

Yann Sauve - how about a young man that may be ready to take the next step this coming year?  At 6'3" and 209. he has the size.  The poor bastard just has to avoid traffic at camp ( off the ice more than on! ), and he will have a chance to show some of the skills highlighted here to the big boys. He looked pretty good in the 5 games he got into for the NHL club last year. Let's see if he can live up to the heights he was hyped at when we got him 41st overall in '08.  

Patrick McNally - our first pick in the '10 draft, this 4th rounder ( 115 overall ) was a welcome surprise to the Canucks. He fell to our team because he is committed to Harvard, and was snapped up when the 40th rated player in Central Scouting slid as a result of his scholastic plans.  His HockeyFutures profile gives us plenty of reasons to smile and wait. Big, skates very well, prolific as a scoring defenseman, this young man has all the potential to be a "man, where did THAT guy come from" prospect when he is finished learning how to rule the world at Harvard.

 

So, not all bad right?  You can make a case for just about any draft pick / prospect in the NHL if you try hard enough.  Again, that is only 6 defenders, there are others. Let us look at some of the drafts made by GMMG in 2011.  Maybe we are not rated up at the top, but I kind of like how the current Executive of the Year did.  Look for all these guys more in the coming years instead of this next year.  Though, we like being surprised guys, and it IS the motto of the team that if you can play, you WILL play, regardless.

 

Niklas Jensen - our 1st rounder. Some highlights here, and his stats here.  The thing is with the #29 pick is, he is not scared of the next step at all. Confidence is important to any prospect, and he sounded confident in this story from draft day.

David Honzik - the first of two '11 3rd round picks, the 6'3, 194 lb goaltender came from the Czech leagues to the Q' for, like many European youth players, for the better competition.  His skills, where he has been compared to Pekka Rinne, lead one to believe that we might have a good one.

Alexandre Grenier - the 90th overall pick, this 3rd rounder is one that really excites me.  He was a guy Patrick Roy used in crucial situations last year, and has been called a classic late bloomer.  You have to love the size, at 6'5" and 200 lbs.  This highlight package definitely should get fans excited. Will most likely play as an overager for Roy again ( though he is eligible for the AHL ).

Joseph Labate - another prep schooler, this young man was a finalist for Minnesota's "Mr Hockey" award, got to be drafted in his home state, and is currently playing and enrolled at Wisconsin. Drafted in the 4th round, 101st overall, this 6'4", 195 pounder had 29 goals and 52 points in 26 games as a prep schooler.  Check the descriptions of his talent here. Nnnnniiiiicccceeeeeee.

Those are just the first four.  There are Ludwig Blomstrad, Frankie Corrado, Patrick Westerholm ( and his twin brother Pontius was also at the latest prospect camp ). Another Swede named Henrik Tommernes.  I did not even mention a 7th rounder in 2010, Sawyer Hannay, who is 6'4", a shade under 200, and apparently can chuck the knuckles, amongst other things.  

 

We all know about Eddie Lack.  Another undrafted fellow.  Jon Iilahti, a highly regarded young Finnish tender drafted in 2010.  Or Joe Cannata, another young goalie from the year before. Neither was a high draft pick, but with the drafting of a goalie every year he has been here, GMMG is keeping the pipeline full as far as the net is concerned as well.

 

The thing is, the current GM can only deal with what he has. Yes, other fans like to point at how the current stars were drafted by Brian Burke and Dave Nonis.  Let's look at that.  ( full Wiki list of the Canucks picks here ) Burke was at the helm from 1998 to 2004, and while his shining jewel was the Sedin deal, and drafted Bryan Allen, Artem Chubarov and Jarko Ruutu 1-2-3 in 1998, no one drafted after that even registers. None of the players in '99 after the Twins.  The Nathan Smith draft in 2000 was an absolute disaster, with only Brandon Reid (7th rd ) even getting a sniff in the NHL.  2001? R J Umberger WAS a good pick, and he was tossed aside over 200K so Burke could act the part of "the Boss".  Kevin Bieksa was found in the 5th round that year though.  2002? Kirill Koltsov was the top pick in the second round, as our first was gone to get Trevor Linden back.  Then of course, in 2003, the folks like to trumpet how we got Ryan Kesler ( folks, I love Kes', but he fell to us at 23rd overall, and the Oilers screwed up! )  And it should be noted that not one player from that draft apart from Kesler ( except Nathan McIver being up and down, and playing a bit for the Nucks and Ducks ) played a minute in the league.

So, maybe it was just Burkie right? You Canuck fans should kiss his feet. He drafted the SEDINS!!!!!!111!!!!  

How about Dave Nonis?  Well, he has a bit better record than his old boss.  In 2004, He drafted Cory Schneider in the 1st round, and Alexander Edler ( it should be noted that, according to Canuck legend, he did not want to draft Edler at all, and had to be strongly convinced by Thomas Gradin, who knew that if the Canucks did not snap him up, the Wings were going to )  Mike Brown was drafted in the 5th round, and Jannik Hansen in the now non existent 9th round that year.  In 2005 he again did pretty good. Luc Bourdon was going to be a star, and Mason Raymond was a good pick in the 2nd round.  Oh, and Mario Bliznak ( who has returned to Europe ) was a 7th rounder that year.

It was the '06 and '07 drafts that were horrible.  In '06, he drafted Michael Grabner in the 1st round.  Good pick there.  But he traded our 2nd pick that year, took Daniel Rahimi in the 3rd. The 4th and 5th rounders were traded.  The 6th round netted Sergei Shirokov ( and fail or success, it was Gillis that put in a ton of work to get the guy over to North America, not the guy who drafted him. )  The '07 draft? Patrick White instead of David Perron, who went to the Blues with the next pick.  Taylor fucking Ellington instead of PK Subban, taken 10 picks later, or even Wayne Simmonds, who was the last pick of the second round.  No picks until the 5th round again that year.  At least we got Taylor Matson 176th overall that year, and Dan Gendur with the 206th pick!

 

So, let us not put it all on the current management.  Not to totally disparage the previous key holders, but they did have a fairly uneven history.  Those lost years of '06 and '07, all Nonis's fault, are a definite reason for a shoddy rating now, as those year's picks could and should be challenging for spots right now on the NHL team.

Mr Gillis may have to wait a bit to see how his picks all turn out.  Maybe he goes down in history as just as inept at judging young hockey flesh as the team's previous two guys. Maybe not.  Ratings like the ESPN story are basically just what one person says anyhow.  All I can say is that I am happier as a Canuck fan with the prospects and their slower and more measured progress ( by design ) under Gillis than the way the young players were developed previously.

Just an opinion though, right!

 

Enjoy your summer.

 

 

Comment 65 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You missed the guy

I am most excited about right now. Joseph Labate is a 6’4 high school center with sick hands.

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 19, 2011 12:03 AM PDT reply actions  

I got him!
Joseph Labate – another prep schooler, this young man was a finalist for Minnesota’s “Mr Hockey” award, got to be drafted in his home state, and is currently playing and enrolled at Wisconsin. Drafted in the 4th round, 101st overall, this 6’4", 195 pounder had 29 goals and 52 points in 26 games as a prep schooler. Check the descriptions of his talent here. Nnnnniiiiicccceeeeeee.

I am pretty excited about him too. All that size, and he is still growing and filling out! Perhaps after dominating Wisconsin he can be enticed out of school early? ;-)

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I swear I read every word

of this post. Not sure what happened there. In my defense it was after midnight. And you know what happens after midnight.

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 19, 2011 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

"we gonna let it all hang out" ?

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Precisely

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 19, 2011 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I forgot to ask earlier

But were you doing one or all of shaking, dancing, or shouting?

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 21, 2011 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Some talent

does not mean more talent than other teams, Dan. The article ranked talent in the under-leagues.

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 19, 2011 8:11 AM PDT reply actions  

but yes

it isn’t all on Gillis, as he only took over the team what, 3 years ago? Building a strong pipeline can take a lot of time…

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 19, 2011 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

was not really putting it “all” on any one guy. I pointed out the two lost Nonis years just as a point of fact of the weakness in our system of guys ready to play this year.

The article was one fellow, and I did not want to get too specific about it, as I have not read it.

They can rank them however they want. I just think there is too much talent in our system to be the second worst in the league.

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Vancouver is one of like 5 teams that they have yet to post a detailed explanation for, but it looks like they’re putting one team up per day so the Canucks should be available within a week.

by TKHO on Aug 19, 2011 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

They apparently do it alphabetically.

Funny how Atlanta Winnipeg went from first to last on their order of teams

by Chocolate on Aug 19, 2011 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Canucks development system

I agree with you that this is a time to be optimistic about the future of the Canuck’s development programme. As you say, it is impossible to look at the vast majority of young players in junior and say that this individual will be a sure-fire star. There are far too many variables in the mix. The Canucks’ management and ownership commitment to strengthening the scouting and minor league development systems does, however, bode well for the future. Limited in the amount they can spend on players on the roster, the organization is not limited in how much they can spend on their scouting and development programmes and the Aquilinis appear to be committed to doing what is necessary to maximize the productivity of the development programme. This differ, in my opinion, from past years when the philosophy seemed to be pick what you hope will be the best player available and get him into the line-up as soon as possible and see what happens. Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn’t. At least now I see a rationale behind the selections and a willingness to give those picked the time to develop. Hopefully we will be seeing the results of this philosophy for years to come. I see an increasing number of young players in the Vancouver system in whom we can reasonably place high hopes and some of our best could well be developing overseas where neither the fans nor ESPN can knowledgeably comment on their progress or potential. I am really looking forward to the youngsters camp and then the main training camp to see for myself what may be in the future for the Canucks.

by John Andress on Aug 19, 2011 9:37 AM PDT reply actions  

You forgot

Seb Erixon. He had an excellent year in the SEL racking up 20 points (5g, 15a) in 44 games with Timra IK. Remember, he’s a 21 year old playing with mostly prime-aged and older men.

He’ll be on the Wolves roster starting this year, and I’m pretty excited about him. Could work out to a good offensive defenseman.

by seedvt on Aug 19, 2011 12:59 PM PDT reply actions  

He is there too!

I guess I need to bold more things! LOL

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like him too

any kid that proclaims when he signs that “I am going there to win a job” has my support and admiration

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

So you're telling me that because of Brian Burke and Burke Nonis, our team DOESN'T look like this today?

Daniel Sedin-Henrik Sedin-Mikael Grabner
Alexander Burrows- Ryan Kesler- RJ Umberger
David Perron-Manny Malhotra-Jannick Hansen
Chris Higgins-Maxim Lapierre-Samuelsson/Marco Sturm

Duncan Keith (drafted 5 spots after Kolstov!!!!!)-Dan Hamhuis
Alex Edler-Niklas Kronvwall (drafted 5 spots after Nathan Smith)
Kevin Bieksa-Sami Salo

Ok, so Grabner was Gillis’ error, but if Burke had drafted Duncan Keith and Niklas Kronvwall, we wouldn’t have had to trade him for Keith Ballard!

Enjoy another 40 years of not winning a Cup Toronto…

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 19, 2011 10:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Not to mention that Quinton Howden.

Who one day, mark my words, will be one of the better defensive two-way 2nd/3rd line forwards in the league, would be coming through the pipeline with the rest of our prospects.

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 19, 2011 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here we go

 I said that the people that keep trying to give all the credit to the past regimes are wrong.

They talk of how they had a big part of “building that team” when their team is out of the playoffs, and the media all play along.

No one expects everyone above would have stayed, and that trades don’t happen. But I believe I showed pretty clearly that both of them had, at the very least, spotty drafting records. Some home runs, sure, but some pretty shitty ones too. Shit, if the Oilers weren’t as dumb as to take Bouchard instead of Kesler…well…that would not have been good either!

So, luck is involved, as much as the guess work of drafting.

I do really believe the two worst draft years in a long while for this team, the 06/07 ones, affect our depth harshly today, and helped get the local boy canned.

I missed the Keith one! Can you imagine if they had kept those guys though. To tell you the truth, the forwards missed don’t make me groan as much as the defensemen. Can you imagine if our bklue line included Keith and Kronwall? Shit, just one of them!

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bien, c'est ca.

That line-up probably goes over the salary cap, but it’s the principle of missing out on these players….the big winger for Kesler, the Norris trophy winner, and the physical puck-mover.

The thing is, yes drafting is a crap-shoot and a lot depends on luck, but at the same time Keith and Kronvwall were taken within 5 picks of the guys that Vancouver did take…and at the point they were taken, I’m sure there was no clear-cut way that Nathan Smith or Kirill Koltsov were heads and tails above Kronvwall or Keith in terms of ranking. It was obviously a case of either the scouts not doing their job, or Burke being too damn stubborn. The drop in quality is IMMENSE it’s not like Chicago and Detroit only walked out with the better players: Vancouver’s picks were complete busts. That’s indicative of bad scouting.

Oh, and can we forget the reason announcement that Burke and Pat Quinn didn’t pull the trigger on a trade for Wayne Gretzky? Again, no surprise that both of these guys also eventually worked for the LEafs

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 20, 2011 6:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m sure there was no clear-cut way that Nathan Smith or Kirill Koltsov were heads and tails above Kronvwall or Keith in terms of ranking. It was obviously a case of either the scouts not doing their job, or Burke being too damn stubborn.

It’s not that simple and I believe you are purely speaking in hindsight. No, there was no way that Smith and Koltsov were heads and tails above. But I’m sure they weren’t much below either. That’s what makes drafting a crapshoot. I think you may also be forgetting the team’s needs at the time as well. Hell I can say all that and you could still be right about the Canucks’ shitty scouting. I’m just presenting the flipped side of the coin.

Nucks Misconduct Contributor
We chew and spit you out. We laugh, you scream and shout. All flee, with fear you run. You’ll know where we come from:
Damage incorporated.........GO!

by Sean Zandberg on Aug 20, 2011 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

True, plus

we don’t know what Burke or Nonis were looking for in evaluating candidates to be drafted. I mean, were they even picking BPA (from their own master list)? At least we know Gillis values character and hockey sense when looking at somebody we might potentially draft.

What Burke saw in Smith or Koltsov that led him to pick them over Kronwall and Keith might just have been a reflection of what he himself valued in a player as GM of the Canucks at the time… but we’re not even sure what that was. Who knows if it was even truculence, belligerence and whatnot back then?

And yeah, those 06/07 drafts were just horrid, and it’s why our rankings took a hit, even though MG has been trying to make up for those 2 years in other ways. For example getting Sweatt as a college UFA, or going after undrafted players like Lack and Tanev.

Rogers Arena - the Sugarbowl!

by Big Blue Whale on Aug 21, 2011 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

See, that was sorta my point, and sorta not

100% agree on the draft being a crapshoot. But you can tell, or, you should be able to tell, if a player has “it”.

Now, Detroit is the gold standard for our team, it seems, especially in this aspect. In the way that the Wings do it, they look for the same things that GMMG says he is. Skill and talent, of course, but strength of character and being good people ( he drafts for smarts too )

People with all those base points are far more likely to have “it”. The skill, I think, as scouts and the GM that listens to them, is finding “it” in the late rounds.

Now, I may need to go back over the links to make sure, but apart from 98, where he did get three good players ( and then proceeded to not develop them correctly. Allan needed more time in the minors. I know we had some not as good as now teams back then, but he was rushed into the lineup.

That seemed to be Burkie’s MO then. Fill holes, and fly by the seat of your pants. Someone on the blue line is struggling, and the fans are getting antsy? Well, trade your 2nd and 3rd and you can get a player to replace him.

The thing is, we don’t have a lot of late round guys that made the team much back in those years. Since Burke and Nonis were around ( and without taking the time to verify everything, but here is the Canuck Library page ), from 98 to the present, and even being generous about it, here’s the list of guys that played at least more than an extended tryout, cup of coffee, etc. that were taken in the 3rd ( for comparison to the sainted Wings, I think Datsyuk was a 6th, same with Z, and the Mule was even later )

98- Ruutu
99-Rene Vydareny ( may be stretching it a bit there! )
00- taken in the 7th, compared 2 3rd for the two above,the immortal Brandon Reid.
01-Bieksa in the 5th, some guy from the 7th named Jason King
03- Nathan McIver in the 8th ( really picking the bones now, aren’t I?)
04- A very good year in comparison. Edler was 91st overall in the 3rd, Mike Brown was taken in the 5th, and Jannik Hansen in the 9th.

I could go on, but you get the gist.

Only Juice, Edler, and Hansen are on the team.

That is why I will always like Burke as a media personality, and thank him for the Twins, but really, every time I read another “Canucks owe current success to T.O Duo”, or "Burke and Nonis Fingerprints all over Canucks Success ", I want to shoot the frigging COTU Eastern Media Mafia asshole that wrote it.

Regardless of his “list”, or how he viewed the players, and all respect to his sorta success along the way, him and his little buddy could not hold a candle to GMMG. First thing out guy did was get money spent on the system ( and don’t tell me McCaw would not spend like Aquilini, dude gave Messier 7 mil for 3 years at a time that was outrageous )…and all of the sudden, guys like Lack, Tanev, and Sweatt are on the team for not even a pick.

Its still a crapshoot, but there are more young guys listed in my post above to get excited about than I can remember as a Canuck fan looking at the farm ( mainly because they would force them into the lineup too soon in the previous two regimes )…that is why I could not believe we got the 2nd worst rating in the mentioned article.

Oh, and Burke is still a shitty GM. In my opinion. Nonis did a better job in drafting, it could be argued, when here, of the two, but neither one really got me excited about the young players in the pipeline like we have now on our ESPN 29th ranked system.

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 21, 2011 2:35 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good post; I agree with what you said here.

With Burke’s success in Anaheim, it’s been said that he mainly put the finishing touches to an already good core, making them into a legitimate contender. He won’t necessarily build up a good foundation, but he can certainly make trades and other big moves that will complete a roster and find that missing piece to put your team over the top.

Nonis seems to be the exact opposite; people used to call him No-nutz for his unwillingness to make big moves – not saying all big moves are good, of course. OTOH, he certainly had a better record at drafting in the late rounds than Burke did, for whatever reason.

Both GMs have their strengths and weaknesses and seem to compliment each other, actually. We’re looking for MG to be able to do both in just the right combination and balance.

Some Hawks-haters think that all Chicago did was tank, get lottery picks and then achieve success, but in reality Tallon made some very astute moves like trading for Ladd, Sharp and Versteeg, along with drafting guys like Brouwer, Byfuglien and Hjalmarsson in the late rounds. These players were all important. Laugh at his free agent signings (Hossa and Campbell) all you want, but he built a winner through good drafting and smart transactions. They’d be a perennial Cup favourite if it weren’t for cap management issues.

A funny thing with Nonis was that his drafts seemed to get worse and worse with each passing year. He did an outstanding job in 2004, and ’05 was still good too (RIP Luc), plus Bliznak had some potential IMO. ’06 was average in that we got 2 players in Grabner and Shirokov who both, at least, scored an NHL goal and really could have been future fixtures with the Canucks. ’07 however was just plain bad.

Because we might have more of these unknowns taking up somewhat prominent positions on our prospect depth chart than some other teams, that would probably lead the guys at HF to think we’re not doing so well. However, Lack and Tanev in particular have made astronomical leaps up the prospect rankings, so it’s not a case of “the best of the worst” taking up these high spots. It’s just that they’ve been so much better than expected.

The rankings may say we’re 27th, but I think it’s a little misleading as we have a lot more depth at each position now, as opposed to just a few gems plus some longshots like in the past. Even our late-rounders have upside (Anthony, Tommernes etc). It all seems so much more well-rounded, and I honestly think that there are more surefire NHL’ers in the current pool who will have a role on this team, compared to before.

Plus I don’t even think these ratings are necessarily right. But I don’t really care too much – we all know MG has poured a lot more resources into scouting and development, and it should start paying off in possibly another 2 years. More money = better training and development programs + more scouts, and that leads to more players we’ll know more about.

For now Vancouver’s ranking will take a hit as players drafted in ’06 and ’07 should have been pretty much ready to make the jump by now, if you follow the 5-year rule of thumb for prospects in general. But we all know what happened there…

Before, we never had many prospects to be excited about. Compare that with now, when everybody seems to have a different favourite prospect who they can’t wait to see in action with their junior teams or the Wolves.

Rogers Arena - the Sugarbowl!

by Big Blue Whale on Aug 21, 2011 4:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ask any Sens fan (or Habs) who REALLY built the Ducks...

Bryan Murray drafted Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry, and signed Chris Kunitz and Dustin Penner as undrafted free agents. He traded for Rob Neidermayer,

Pierre Gauthier signed Andy MacDonald as an undrafted free agent, traded for Sami Pahlsson and JS Giguere, drafted Ilya Bryzgalov,

So what did Burke do? Well, he signed Teemu Selanne and Scott Neidermayer! But Teemu wanted to return to the Ducks, where he had had his most success. And Scott wanted to play with his brother Rob.

But he did trade for Travis Moen, Chris Pronger, Francois Beauchemin and Sean O’Donnell. So he basically added one all-star defenseman (who he acquired from an old friend who was in a pickle and HAD to make the trade), one checking line winger and two defenseman who were only top-4 because they were paired with two future Hall-of-Famers.

So, Yes his moves are directly responsible for winning the Stanley Cup, but he by no means BUILD the team. He took a team that had great goaltending and a young forward core with tons of potential, capitalized on the situations of three future hall of famers, and added some depth toughness to the third line and the defense.

Let’s not forget that the team had made the Finals in 2003, thanks to the work of Gauthier and Murray. Burke just did what he does best, take chances on big moves. It paid off, and he deserves credit. But his drafting is still horrible.

The only worthwhile player he ever drafted as Ducks GM was Bobby Ryan. And that was 2nd over-all.

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 21, 2011 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

No he didn't build it...

But he did add three Hall-of-Famers to the team that all turned out to still be in their primes. No easy feat!

I honestly have never seen so many “but he only got him ’cause” after a GMs moves, than Burke’s.

Burke signs Teemu Selanne. But he only got him because…
Burke signs Scott Niedermayer. But he only got him because…
Burke trades for Chris Pronger. But he only got him because…

Can we do this for every signing?

GMMG signs Dan Hamhuis. But he only got him because he is from Smithers and wants to play close to home…

No we don’t do that because it is stupid. There are obviously lots of reasons why people sign somewhere. Just give the credit to the GM.

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

But at the same time, what really grinds my gears is the significant drop-off.

Say they were ranked similar, and Keith is still Keith and Kronvwall is still Kronvwall, but Smith and Koltsov become decent NHL players. That’s a crapshoot. But when you pass over two all-star defenseman for two guys that never made the NHL, something is wrong, whether it’s the scouting or the GM’s organisation philosophy.

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 21, 2011 7:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure, and the flipped side of the coin only holds so much merit given the way Detroit successfully drafts as mentioned by Dan. That’s not a fluke.

Nucks Misconduct Contributor
We chew and spit you out. We laugh, you scream and shout. All flee, with fear you run. You’ll know where we come from:
Damage incorporated.........GO!

by Sean Zandberg on Aug 22, 2011 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

My dream

is that GMMG builds an institution which is as strong and long lasting as Detroit

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 22, 2011 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Peter Principle is still alive and well.

During the days of Burke and Nonis there were two management/coaching types who were consistently inept: Ron Delorme was the head of a scouting team which almost always made the wrong decisions in the draft and Ron Wilson was, for a time, in charge of a disgustingly dreadful PK and PP. Today Delorme is still head scout (I believe) and Wilson is head coach of the Leafs.

"Why are we so quick to blame? What is the attraction in that?" - Carmela Soprano

by Bobby Canuck on Aug 22, 2011 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

The thing is

Delorme has found some good guys too. Burkes just did not use his own mind enough back then. Scouts say he is good?

Well, lets go!

The organization does still have Ronny, but guys like Smyl, Gradin, and others in the beefed up scouting all have an equal say to Delorme, I think.

It does seem like they organization has given Delorme more help to not be the only guy “responsible”. Buck stops with GMMG.

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 22, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

seriously don’t understand how delorme still has a job with the canucks when they can’t find any of the buckets of good prospects coming out of his region, the WHL. i also remember hearing that delorme was behind the patrick white pick, which should be cause for firing all by itself.

good scouts make great franchises, bad ones destroy them.

by bitterguy on Aug 25, 2011 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m the last to defend the guy. He has found a few guys, but yeah.

Most teams change it up every few years, unless they have a guy that kicks ass.

In GMMG’s defense, I think Ronny is a figurehead more or less. Still listened too, but not like Gradin in Europe, Smyl with the collage guys, etc. Plus I would imagine that MG is a man that makes his own picks too.

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 25, 2011 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

At least we didn’t draft Stefan first overall over both Sedins.

by marcness52 on Aug 22, 2011 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok, now on a more positive note.

the Chicago wolves should be exciting this year. They should also be filled with solid Vancouver prospects, something they didn’t often get from the Atlanta Thrashers (RIP).
So my question to my fine fellow Canucks fans is:

How do you see the Wolves line-up shaping up? Based on our prospect depth, we could be looking at something like:

Archibald-Hodgeson-Anthony
Sweat-Schroeder-Rodin
Mancari-Ebbet-Volpatti
Andersson, Pinazziruto

Sulzer-Parent
Connauton-Sauve
Andersson-Polasek
Baumgartner

Lack

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 19, 2011 10:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Climie is the other goalie

He was very good for San Antonio in the AHL last year.

I see Hodgson making the big team, and perhaps Mancari, and maybe a camp surprise out of Archibald or Volpatti ( who I would love to see make the big team ), who can and does fight like Ryp’, is pretty quick, and may have more offensive skill. Yeah, he is from my old home town…what?

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 19, 2011 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

You see Hodgson starting with the Canucks?

To replace Kesler? Not a bad idea, it would give him a real shot at proving himself cause it’s getting close to now or never territory at least to have value to the Canucks.

by Canuckelhead on Aug 20, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I definitely see it.

And I believe he’ll be serviceable in that role. Although I feel a full year of AHL seasoning will do him wonders, he’s the best candidate for the 2nd line fill-in.

Our actual starting line-up come October 6th:

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Higgins-Hodgeson-Nolan/Samuelsson(if ready)
Sturm-Malhotra-Hansen
Bitz-Lapierre-Oreskovich

Buying out Kubas since July 2010

by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Aug 20, 2011 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do

I think he probably learned a fair amount about the “little things” in the playoffs. When he got in, he was solid defensively.

I know he can and will probably be in Kes’s spot to start, but when he comes back, I would like to see him on the wing with Malhotra, taking the draws that our top faceoff guy gets tossed on.

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 20, 2011 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

give hodgeson the offensive zone starts and malholtra the defensive zone starts.

unless the canucks are up by a few – then hodsgeson takes d zone faceoffs as well and malholtra still takes all the draws on the pk

a ginger ball hockey player... no wonder I'm a Canucks fan

by SteveNux on Aug 22, 2011 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think

there could be a better player for Hodgson to ‘apprentice’ with than Malhotra.

I'll do it tomorrow, that seems like a pretty good idea to me
What's wrong with tomorrow, I'm watching him but who's watching me?

by Smoboy41 on Aug 22, 2011 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

except for maybe Kesler… but he’ll be busy winning us games to focus on Franchise.

I frown at the idea of those who want to trade him. He might be a tad slow, but he’s an excellent play maker and goal scorer. Think Daniel Sedin but with a bit more Canadian than Swedish style.

a ginger ball hockey player... no wonder I'm a Canucks fan

by SteveNux on Aug 22, 2011 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Darren Haydar's gotta be in there somewhere

He’s a legitimate AHL All-Star veteran and he’ll probably be on the top line.

Rogers Arena - the Sugarbowl!

by Big Blue Whale on Aug 21, 2011 4:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm...

I disagree so much with this article, its hard to believe we watched the same team for the past 13 years!

1) You listing off every mediocre prospect in our system basically proves why we are ranked low in top end talent. Although I love a lot of the guys in our system like you do, if I take off my Canuck glasses for a second I realize that they aren’t likely to be impact players.

2) You admitted Nonis had two good drafting years, but discounted 2006 because we traded our picks… 2007 we missed on White, but there was a lot of teams that missed in the 20-30 range… People get mad at GMs when they “make a high risk selection.” Sometimes they are going to be wrong. Thats why it is high risk! And we picked late so that is the time to gamble…. Schneider, Bourdon, Grabner, White. Not a bad haul if you take away the tragedy. And Subban? really? The next six picks in that draft never played in the NHL either. Are we doing this with all players, because we will be exhausted!

3) Our core players on this team today: Sedin, Sedin, Burrows, Kesler, Hamhuis, Bieksa, Edler, Luongo. Uhhhh… Are they all from the previous GMs? OK Hamhuis is there…. How is GMMG way better than Nonis and Burke? I think you are totally undervaluing their stamp on this team….

4) We wouldn’t have Kesler if Edmonton wasn’t stupid? OK let’s not open Pandora’s box here…. Plus that pick was criticized for a while before Kesler broke out…

5) How do we know GMMG has been drafting well? How many games have we seen out of his drafts? I looked it up… 13. (How could we not draft Derek Stepan in 2008!!! He went 10 picks after Sauve…)

I actually like GMMG. He has done a good job. Nonis and Burke did a fantastic job too. Can’t it be both ways? Who cares if our cupboard is bare? We are on the top of the mountain, and I’d rather be here than where Edmonton is.

And stop listening to Toronto media. They just like to hear themselves talk.

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 1:59 PM PDT reply actions  

D men are slower to develop

than forwards for the most part. Sauve was a good pick and in 15 years people looking back will be mystified that he went so late. He is a stud just waiting to happen. As soon as he figures out how good he can be he is going to be a beast,

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 22, 2011 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh I'm not knocking him

I just hate it when people do things like that when looking back at drafts… You can always find a better player that went lower

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

There are a couple that bother me

but only the ones where it was universally understood that one guy was better than the other. Or it should have been. I watched a lot of Brad Richards when he was in junior. I will never understand how he went in the 3rd round.

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 22, 2011 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sir

I believe you are putting a bit much on me there. I was just positing that the Canucks don’t have the worst system, and have some late round gems. How man times did I say its a crapshoot.

1- Every one is mediocre? Come on now. Sweatt, Schroeder and Rodin are top end talents. Schroeder learnt how to be a pro and had a mediocre season. That does not make him mediocre. Section mentions Sauve, and I am high on him too. Connauton, Polasek and McNally have substantially higher projections than mediocre. Of the last picks, Labate, Jensen and Grenier all project to be NHLers. Its too soon to rate their level.

2- I discounted 06 and 07 because their was not one guy in those drafts that was worth a shit. Does Detroit crap out on entire years? And, yes Subban. I wanted him picked with that pick after seeing him in the WJT. There is nothing wrong with bringing that up.

3- Our core. Not once did I discount Burkie and Nonis for what they a have left behind. Of all of those, only Edler was not resigned to below market deals by GMMG. I undervalue the Burke/Nonis era’s stamp on the prospects.

4- Whatever on Kesler. Even in hindsight, Bouchard was a dumb pick, and he was taken right before Kesler. You may have critiqued the pick then. I never did, myself.

5- Thats just being a little snotty my friend. One, the amount of games they have played so far is irrelevant. Did you notice how easily callups fit into the team last year? That’s the system, and the organization making sure they all play the same way as the big team. Besides, of many of them ( like McNally at Harvard, Rodin and Andersson in the SEL, plaus others in scholl like Labate )have yet to play a game in the organization yet!

No, it cannot be both ways. Burke and Nonis had their strengths. Like I said above, I never said they had “no impact” on the team. What I said was that the T.O media way overemphasized it. Yeah, they drafted who they did. Burke and Nonis did not sign ANY of the stars to long term deals. Certainly not for the great dollar amounts GMMG did.

So, I think you are reading a bit much into what I wrote, which was to show their is more strength in the system than was written. It was never a hatchet job on either of the previous two.

Thanks for the input though!

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 22, 2011 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry...

Didn’t mean to be snotty, and all of your points here are valid. I like the guys you have mentioned too, but they aren’t really mainstream, which is what the article was about.

I was definitely irked by a few statements you made in the comments.

[Brian Burke] and [Dave Nonis] could not hold a candle to GMMG
Oh, and Burke is still a shitty GM. In my opinion.

If a player is drafted in ’05 he would be 24 right now, so not really a prospect anymore… So ya, we traded away the only valuable asset of the ’06 and ’07 drafts in Grabner.

My point is that while you can blame them for their lack of quantity of picks developed, They also drafted 5 of our core/best 8 players today (Sedin, Sedin, Edler, Bieksa, Kesler), signed Burrows, and Traded for Lou.

Raymond, Schneider, and Hansen also have made recent contributions. Plus, the fact that the youngest a Nonis drafted player could be is 22, really the only place Nonis’ prospects could be is in our lineup. Burke is far too long gone to have any impact on our current stock.

Maybe Nonis and Burke swing for the fences in the draft… who knows! The point is that enough of their picks have worked out to give us a core that is a good President’s Trophy winning team now.

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

You sound like a fan of those guys

And that is fine. But please, don’t be one of those guys that wants to say they “built” the Stanley Cup contending team. Its just not true.

The thing is, in 06/07, the point I was making about Nonis is very valid. Let’s look at those two years closer, maybe I did not make my point. Most teams would consider it a success if they had at least a player or two from a draft year still in the system.

So, in 06, he drafted Grabner. I would say him a good pick in the first round, but for me, I wanted a guy that was 6’2" and 228 at 18, Chris Stewart. But lets say OK on that one. He then traded our 2nd for a guy not in the league any more, Mika Noronen. The 3rd in a deal with Mojzis ( also not in the league. ) for Erich Weinrich, a total failure that year, and not in the league. The only reason we had a 3rd was the fact the Ducks signed Carlyle, and we used it on Daniel Rahimi.

OK, it is a crap shoot, and he was a big defenseman, I guess we can say that pick was not horrible except in hindsight. He then threw away the 6th on Shirokov ( I say he tossed it aside, because he made no effort to get the guy over here. For however that turned out, it was all GMMG that got Sergei to NA ) Some guy named Simek and another named Fuller complete that year.

Not a one is left. Only Grabner brought back a guy that is even with the team any more. Sorry, that is unacceptable to me.

07- Patrick Fucking White. Enough said. Even in the crapshoot of drafting late in teh first, that was a bullshit pick, for a guy that was showing even then he did not have the high end skills to project to the NHL. But, OK, you give him a pass for White ( and its this year that we should have guys leading our AHL club, hungry for a spot from )

So, in the 2nd round, with a pick that was traded for, because ours was traded away, Taylor Fucking Ellington. Horrible bust, regardless of crapshoot. I remember this draft. It helped to give me the hairline I now have! The disappointment of taking this guy, after taking White, well. Other guys available in the 2nd round, to be fair? Bill Sweatt, Eric Tancredi ( and the guy I mentioned I was hoping for at the time, Subban. Shit, in retrospect, I would have been happy with Spaling and/or Wayne Simmonds, taken at the end of the 2nd ). Now, I totally agree, its not fair in retrospect sometimes. But when even an admittedly rabid fan like me could see the guys to take at the time…well…shit.

The rest of that round? Well, the 3rd, 4th, and 5th were traded away for Brian Smolinski ( OK ) Steve McCarthy (maybe? kinda meh ), and the immortal Tommi Santala ) A Russian named Kablukov is still over in the KHL, Taylor Matson is supposedly signed to the team for camp after finishing school, and Dan Gendur is a career minor league player with speed.

Now, in comparison, in 08, we got Hodgson and Sauve with the two first picks. I would not call either one a bust, and think both will be in the NHL in the next year or two, for sure. Our 3rd was gone because of a Nonis deal in 06. Our 4th was gone elsewhere in a deal for Sopel by Nonis in the past. In the 5th, Prab Rai. OK, jury still out, but at least a good local kid, and Froshaug and Morgan Clark. I think you can only handicap GMMG on the last two.

In 09 ? GMMG’s first year unencumbered by past dealings? 1-Jordan Schroeder , 2-Anton Rodin,3 Kevin Connauton,4-Jeremy Price,5-Peter Andersson6 -Joe Cannata, 7 Steven Anthony. I almost as excited by the 7th rounder as the 1st!

Its of course a judgement thing, and I am sorry if I made it seem dismissive to Burke and Nonis fans, but that kind of drafting ( with a better and bigger scouting staff, and a whole bunch spent on development ( like Gagner going around and coaching them all up, for instance ) alone makes me think that Burke can’t hold a candle to GMMG. The deals that he signed all the stars too is just icing on the cake.

I don’t think Burke and Nonis went in with a plan at all. They probably used Central Scouting a lot more than our guy does, I would think. That is the impression I got living through those years anyhow. How many times were we sold on a guy like Weinrich as the "guy to get us over the hump?

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 22, 2011 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying that they built it

I’m saying they made a significant contribution.

I like GMMGs first two drafts as well so you’re preaching to the choir there.

I obviously don’t like the ‘07 draft year either, because who would? And ’06 wasn’t special. But to say that they didn’t have a plan isn’t true and I know you know that. Listen to one conversation with Burke and you know he has a plan of what he wants. (Nonis is a lot like Burke as he was always his protege.)

I think you are looking too hard at what they didn’t do, not what they did do. But all fair points. Remember Burke had a lot more budget constraints before the fans came back and we got some playoff revenue. Not an excuse, but an obstacle he overcame…

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry, no.

I think what the miscommunication is about basically, the level of credit to give them.

I never said, in the article, or here, that they did not give a contribution. But the Sedins were no brainers, were they not. Nonis made a fantastic deal to get Luongo. I would cheer that all day.

But to say they had a “plan” here? For all the talk in T.O ( and that is a team they had to convince the fanbase, and media, that they were going to build the “right” way. You better formulate a plan in the COTU in that circumstance, or they will eat you alive.

I totally don’t think they had a real blue print here. They changed it almost every year. Anyone that watched the team during the days of Burke could see that . How many trades at the deadline , and how many sales jobs in the presser about how this guy or guys was “the piece” that would get us past a first or second round.

Felix Potvin is the answer in goal. NO, its Kevin Weekes we are trading for. Naaah, forget him, Dan Cloutier know how to fight! You know?

I am not looking too hard though, honestly. I am not saying this to defend myself, or to malign those guys to put GMMG on a pedestal. Its not about that.

To me, the main point is that, in the time he has been here, Gillis has shown himself to be far more pragmatic, forward thinking, and that he definitely had a plan. The way he told an entire city how far they had to go when he was told at the presser how close the team was, because the media thought along the same lines as you might, or that even I might have ( we are all guilty of buying the Blarney )..was awesome.

I totally stand by the statement about not having a plan, because they did not show it. How often in the past were guys rushed into the team, only to falter and be traded? Or, traded before becoming good somewhere else?

Its not focussing on what they did not do, dear sir. Rather its focussing on what Gillis has done since he has been here, following a blueprint. They all make changes based on circumstance. Just that, to me as a Canuck fan, I saw way too may guys come and go, with varying degrees of a chance to succeed, rather than guys being on a plan.

Maybe I am buying into this guy’s Blarney as opposed to the other. I do think Burke is one of the most entertaining personalities in hockey. Just that I find his acumen questionable. Nonis, not so much, he seemed a good guy. But Burkie?

To me, he talks a way better game than he does. Its why he is where he is. Its funny, he can be called a Cup winner. But its pretty easy to show that two of those important pieces ( Neidermayer and Pronger ) fell into his lap. He made the deals. Bravo. But if Rob is not there, or Mrs Pronger likes Edmonton, does anyone think that team, as good as it was, wins a Cup? Yet its Burke with the ring, and Bryan Murray with the quiet satisfaction of knowing HE built a Cup winner.

Perception, she is a fickle mistress, huh?

( thx or the convo, for the way, so many times these debates decline into…well, you know. I don’t agree on Burkie, but thats OK. Honestly, on Nonis? Meh? Great, and not very good in the same breath. )

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Aug 22, 2011 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough

Thanks for your points Dan.

Cheers!

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't understand why it can't be both ways...

Nonis and Burke weren’t given the opportunity to retain our star players. GMMG did a great job in doing so, and I believe that Nonis and Burke would have had a tough time topping the deals GMMG gave our core guys. But to critique them on something they never had the opportunity to do isn’t fair to them. I’m happy they are here because all three GMs did a great job in both selection and retention.

Our team won the President’s trophy in large part because of the efforts of three GMs. That’s not a knock on Gillis.

.313/.400/.565

by T.Haynes on Aug 22, 2011 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

5) How do we know GMMG has been drafting well? How many games have we seen out of his drafts? I looked it up… 13.

come on, you have to include undrafted free agent pickups. a lot of the canucks depth now is players that got signed out of college or after their draft eligibility. chris tanev played 29 regular season games by himself last year, plus played in game 7 of the finals, can’t GMMG get some credit for that? its still not going to be a massive total, but prospects are facing a stiff headwind of established vets to find a spot on a stanley cup contending roster the last few years.

by bitterguy on Aug 25, 2011 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I would

comeback with typos.

xv. Damn.
tweet tweet

by eightyseven on Aug 22, 2011 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes you would

Welcome back

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Aug 22, 2011 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

We've

missed you.

I'll do it tomorrow, that seems like a pretty good idea to me
What's wrong with tomorrow, I'm watching him but who's watching me?

by Smoboy41 on Aug 22, 2011 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have we?

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 22, 2011 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

You charmer.

I'll do it tomorrow, that seems like a pretty good idea to me
What's wrong with tomorrow, I'm watching him but who's watching me?

by Smoboy41 on Aug 22, 2011 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

the pipeline is a cockroach or two separated from emptied

Am I paranoid? I don't know. I went to a therapist once, but I left before he gave me the diagnosis, cause he had it out for me.

by Detroit Must Die on Sep 3, 2011 2:19 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Nucks Misconduct community! We scour the web to promptly bring you all of the Vancouver Canucks news when it happens in highly-opinionated fashion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
AV is back, will he last long?
P5205184_small
You just can't make this stuff up!  Vigneault-Kesler-Gillis-Luongo
Elmo1_small
The Role of the Coach
Small
I had a dream
Small
Sell High on Hansen?
Small
If Vigneault Does Not Return?
Dsc01373_small
Let's Stop Maligning the President's Trophy
Small
Luongo? Schneider? How about trade both?
Elmo1_small
Many issues wrapped into one…
Small
Individual Canuck Projections

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Nucks Misconduct Store

Nmstore_thumb_medium
Your clothing sucks. Go fix it.

Canucks Stats

Stat

Forwards

Defense

Points

H. Sedin (72)

Edler (45)

Goals

D. Sedin (30)

Edler (11)

Assists

H. Sedin (59)

Edler (34)

Shots

D. Sedin (229)

Edler (212)

Hits

Lapierre (217)

Bieksa (148)

Blocked Shots

Kesler (56)

Edler (120)

ES TOI/G

D. Sedin (14.46)

Bieksa (18.22)

PP TOI/G

D. Sedin (3.21)

Edler (3.25)

PK TOI/G

Malhotra (2.42)

Hamhuis (2.88)

Corsi Rel QoC

Pahlsson (1.008)

Bieksa (0.875)

Zone Starts (OPCT)

D. Sedin (80%)
Malhotra (12%)

Edler (58%)
Alberts (40%)

Updated: March 24


Bartenders

Jasonmask_small Yankee Canuck

Stfulou_small Sean Zandberg

Keslerbomb2_small Kent Basky

Pub Regulars

Edlermirrorreversed_small missy

Rnxbd00z_small vancitydan

Img_8090_small nucksandpucks

Screen_shot_2011-11-27_at_11 Jordan Clarke

299352_525780999561_106000039_30560322_1772728798_n_small Ggooglyboogly

4-eyes_small DanTheStatMan1