Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

As Things Stand


With the recent signing of a FFP (Frequently Favourite Player) of mine, the forward ranks seem to be filling out reasonably well.  There's still some question about a second line scorer, but it's entirely possible that the Canucks will start the year with Samuelsson and Raymond (when he's back from injury) and see if those two can have bounce-back seasons.  Oreskovich should be coming back to the fold as well: he's restricted, limiting his options, and I don't think I'm alone in liking what I saw from him last year.  Still, lots of bodies coming in looking for fourth line work, so maybe he's not returning.  Seriously, there are eight players with the team right now who could make that fourth line...

Added bonus for Raymond ponderers: he's a restricted free agent after this season, making him more desirable to teams - including Vancouver.  Stays?  Gone?  Just have to see.

More interesting, from my point of view, is the defence...

Star-divide

With the acquisition of Alexander Sulzer (AKA "The Replacement"), Vancouver's depth on the back end is downright ludicrous.  There are the Obvious: Sami Salo, Alexander Edler, Dan Hamhuis, Kevin Bieksa, Keith Ballard; the Middling: Aaron Rome, Andrew Alberts; and the Others: Chris Tanev, Yann Sauve, Nolan Baumgartner, Ryan Parent.

Rome has grown on me.  You get the feeling he will go through a brick wall for his team, which is something that every team wants; the problem with that being that "going through a brick wall" may not be the best decision he could have made.  Reasonably young, quite affordable, and with a scoring touch at lower levels that may yet translate to better numbers higher up, he could be quite a desirable target for any team looking to add depth and willing to take a modest risk by giving him more ice time.

There were some brickbats, but I feel vindicated in supporting Alberts.  I'm happy with his play as long as he stays on leash, and the leash jerks him back violently if he tries to cross the centre line.  He is, as he should be, a shut-down guy who can clear the net.  He's been around enough years to recognize plays as they happen, but young enough (and flexible enough) to adapt to new coaching demands.  That being said, he's a bottom-pair defender making well over a million dollars a year.

It's a subjective thing, but it seemed to me that the adventurous, hard-hitting Ballard played at his best when paired with the intellectual Tanev - would that be enough to give Tanev a boost to the big team?  There is certainly an argument for leaving him to star in the AHL for a  season, learn how to run the blue line and pick up his offence there rather than take an ancillary role in Vancouver.  Tanev has the smarts to play in the NHL, but should he?  Maybe not just yet.

Sauve, on the other hand, is a solid candidate to step into a #7 role with the Canucks: primed to be a net-clearing presence, he can not only get practice against NHL players, he can be eased into it in a protected role on a very good team.  Seeing as he would play the same role in Chicago (man, that's weird to type!), why not give him the advantage of NHL practices, coaching, and occasional opposition?

Baumgartner seems to have adapted to his "mentor" position with the Wolves (erk!) over the past year, but you know he longs for one more big league shot: it won't be permanent, certainly not with this club, but he can fill in for spot work as needed.  If you only plan to carry 6 defence through much of the season, there are certainly worse options for an early call-up on a lot of other teams.  Then again, if the AHL staff feel he is a good choice as captain, shouldn't he stay with the players there?

Parent is, as some have to be reminded, a first-round pick who is all of 24 years old.  He was only ever going to be a body-banging defender, and his offence shows it.  He's certainly had diminishing returns as trade bait (Forsberg to Hamhuis to O'Brien), but is coachable and reasonably solid positionally.  And again, is all of 24: plenty of time to go from "18th overall pick" to "veteran journeyman teams ask for" with a bit of work.  It could be more work than the team wants to apply, but that doesn't mean another team won't take the chance, even at the rather hefty price tag...

And this still leaves out Sulzer himself!  He's billed as an offensive defenceman, but most of that has been at the AHL level.  Then again, it's understandable if he found himself hard pressed for playing time on Nashville...  Right now, I'm tempted to slot him in with Rome and Alberts at the mid-level, but a point-producer needs more ice time than either of them get, and I just don't think it's available unless he's much better than advertised!

So that them, for now.  Lots of bodies there, massive depth, and a fair number of potential trade sweeteners, if not outright targets (hello, Keith Ballard!).  Keeping all of them loads up not only the Canucks, but the Wolves and most of the spots on their ECHL affiliate, too!  (BTW: any word on who that will be yet?)  I can't imagine that being the status quo for season's open, but given the repeated cries of "Death Before icing five defence!" (I don't write many chants), this may well the what the team looks like in October.

Thoughts?

Comment 66 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

well done

Kudos for the use of brickbats….though Alberts actually does not get caught that much when he pinches. Yes, it happens, but thats the way the team wants them to play, and most the time he makes the right decision. I love how the guy got better from year to year, and even noticeably faster.

You forgot Connauton, who should be better than the pretty good he already is. We forget the guy led a defenseman factory like the Giants in scoring ( all time ) just a couple years ago.

Peter Andersson has been playing against men for two years in the SEL ( where he commonly draws comparisons to Ohlund ( yesssssss ). He is 6’3" and 194 already at 20. Swedish defensemen HIT now.

Adam Polasek is already making them smile after watching how he did after being a 5th rounder last year, ( and the year before ) as a PEI Rocket in the Q’. ( here you go, check out what he did in his draft year ) .

Of the three, they probably all compete for spots on the Wolves blue line. But I would pick one ( maybe Andersson? Here’s his numbers in the SEL though who knows…they aint that impressive…but I still want to see what the Olie comparison is about. If he is only half as good as that guy when he was younger ( and the comparison probably has something to do with hitting people so they feel it )…well….works for me

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Jul 30, 2011 9:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Connauton...

…Is not ready, even for part time, at the NHL level. I like his offence (which was a huge boon to the Giants!) but the difference in speed between the three leagues is huge. I just don’t think he’s ready for the Canucks yet. That’s okay though: we’ve got to let our defence develop, which is so frikkin’ cool!

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Jul 31, 2011 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

agree with you on alberts

Went out and massively improved his skating over the summer because the team felt it was bad. Hopefully he can do even more. I loved his comments when he re-signed, saying he was happy to return, and he wasn’t worried about the ice time, it was his job to earn it.

He didn’t even test free agency, did he? Signed immediately, even though the ice time was in question.

People are down on him for his first year, but he’s a legit 5/6 d-man, and the sort of character dudes the Canucks need to have entirely throughout the line up.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

AA earned my confidence in him this past season. He massively improved as time went on

Nucks Misconduct Contributor
We chew and spit you out. We laugh, you scream and shout. All flee, with fear you run. You’ll know where we come from:
Damage incorporated.........GO!

by Sean Zandberg on Aug 1, 2011 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

He was massively improved over the previous season but I think in the playoffs he seemed a step behind still. I’m still not convinced he’s a top 6 defenseman. I’d rather have Ballard-Tanev as the bottom pairing.

by marcness52 on Aug 1, 2011 2:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

A step behind? Really? Give me some examples

Nucks Misconduct Contributor
We chew and spit you out. We laugh, you scream and shout. All flee, with fear you run. You’ll know where we come from:
Damage incorporated.........GO!

by Sean Zandberg on Aug 1, 2011 3:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

he was completely dependable and played like I expected him to. He wasn’t a super-mobile guy, but he was big and physical and made the safe plays. I agree with Sean, really glad he resigned because his game got so much better with time.

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 1, 2011 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

if he was a step behind, I’d write it off as him being out of the line up for awhile. I thought he played well, personally.

by Wisp on Aug 1, 2011 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even with Ehrhoff gone, I’m more comfortable with our d-depth this year. Rookies are more experienced.

by Wisp on Jul 30, 2011 9:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Also, perhaps more importantly

Hopefully a full year of healthy, pre back injury Edler. He was on pace for 50 points as well before the injury, which is not talked about enough in my opinion

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jul 30, 2011 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

hopefully. largely depends on staying healthy.

Hopefully Edler shows a little more aggression in initiating offense from the back end. Not to Ehrhoff levels of aggression, but y’know.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good post Thursday

I too agree that Ballard seemed to play better with Tanev – I don’t know if it’s something the two of them had, or more because it allowed him to play his normal (and more comfortable) side. I don’t think it will be enough for Tanev to be up with the big club all the time though – the Alberts deal seems to make him for sure a staple, even though I’m not too sure I want him playing too many minutes.

He was passable in the playoffs, but I honestly would want Rome in over him. I kind of feel like a dope for going along with the “why Rome over Ballard AV??” crowd for so long, because Rome was very solid in the playoffs, and losing him to that suspension was actually pretty devastating (mainly because Hammer was already out). His 750k deal is looking pretty damn good right now. I will still probably cry about his offensive instincts (or lack thereof), but he is a better shutdown guy than most of us were giving him credit for.

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jul 30, 2011 11:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I would still take Ballard over Rome

I think we’ll see that, given more ice time, Ballard is a better overall defenceman than Rome is and hopefully a better d-man than we all think he is. That being said, I would take Rome over Alberts, Tanev or any of the Canucks other depth defencemen.

I suspect that we’ll see something like

Hamhuis-Bieksa
Edler-Ballard
Tanev/Salo-Rome/Alberts

for defensive pairings next season.

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

The love for Rome..it’s growing!

Nucks Misconduct Contributor
We chew and spit you out. We laugh, you scream and shout. All flee, with fear you run. You’ll know where we come from:
Damage incorporated.........GO!

by Sean Zandberg on Aug 1, 2011 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

It’s seems like all my lines of thought lead right to him.

by Sandwich76 on Aug 1, 2011 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

now now

we always loved Rome for the safe back-up man, just not as a top 6 guy over someone like Ballard.

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 1, 2011 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

right now

I would actually rank Rome as #5 on the depth chart with Tanev as #6. In reality though I think Salo will slot into the #5 spot with Rome and Alberts swapping back and forth the #6 spot.

by Sandwich76 on Aug 1, 2011 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

You would rate Rome over Salo?!

Frequent visitor to Nucks Misconduct.

by Vancouverguy on Aug 2, 2011 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I would

I’ll make it clear that I understand that Rome doesn’t have anything even resembling coming close to Salo’s offensive accumen. But now you’ve got Bieksa, Ballard and Edler to QB the two power play units, so having Salo is nice, but not necessary.

Rome is a stronger and more physical player. He’s harder to knock off the puck, and he blocks as many shots as Salo does. Salo is injury prone, and I think his age is going to start slowing him down this season. I feel that Rome better suits what I’m looking for in a 5-6 d-man.

Don’t get me wrong, I love Salo, and I think we’ll probably see him play 60 games this season. With some slightly sheltered minutes, mostly on the power play, he will be useful. And maybe he’ll serve as a calming/mentoring force for Ballard and Tanev this season

by Sandwich76 on Aug 2, 2011 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’d argue that Salo is probably the better defensive D-man too. I don’t value Salo for just his big shot. Salo’s a legitimate guy that you can throw out to defend against the other team’s top pairings. The only thing Salo is worse than Rome, is his durability, and somewhat his physicality…

Frequent visitor to Nucks Misconduct.

by Vancouverguy on Aug 2, 2011 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree. Rome blocks as many shots as Salo does, has substantially less giveaways per game (probably because he passes way less, but I’m looking at defence rather than offense), a better CORSI, better on ice +/-per60, and not only does he dish out more abuse in the corners he can also take more.

by Sandwich76 on Aug 2, 2011 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sandwich is Zanberg!

by marcness52 on Aug 3, 2011 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, but I rarely disagree with his logic. As uninteresting as that is.

by Sandwich76 on Aug 3, 2011 6:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

On the other hand...

…Salo clears the net better, has that massive shot, and has been more reliable for far longer than Rome. Rome’s game improved to a point Salo was already at.

That being said, I would have been okay had Salo decided to walk: that injury history is an incredibly frustrating wild card for every game.

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Aug 3, 2011 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rome’s game improved to a point Salo was already at.

But his offense is nowhere near Salo’s yet though.

I was feeling similar about your second thought, but a 1 year, 2M deal is pretty low risk for what Salo can bring when he’s healthy. Hell, maybe he’ll go on an Iron Man streak. Weirder things have happened

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Aug 3, 2011 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

With a team like the Canucks

there really isn’t any risk to signing an injury prone player. We are likely spending at or near the cap so we can use LTIR to its utmost benefit and our owners can afford to pay guys who aren’t playing.

"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"Are you out of your fucking mind? You think I'm just going to rape you on the off chance that hopefully you're into that shit?" - Louis CK
Nucks Misconduct's Prodigal Son, Chief Curmudgeon, and Chief Hunk.

by Section 312 on Aug 3, 2011 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's basically

What I meant by low risk.

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Aug 3, 2011 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Whoops!

Er, I mean, uh… harrumph! I thought that was so obvious that it didn’t need mentioning!

(Good cover, huh?)

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Aug 3, 2011 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Raymond: skilled speedy checker, elite speed, with some goal scoring ability. He’ll find a home fine. Two way forward. someone will want him.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:50 AM PDT reply actions  

That someone...

…includes the Canucks. He’s not exactly past his prime, but the challenge is to see which of the past two years is the rule, and which the exception.

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Jul 31, 2011 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

It’s difficult to guess, because his shooting percentage has jumped around every year, alternating between just over 11 and 7.6 (11.3, 7.6, 11.5, 7.6). So his goals/60 was down a lot last year, but his A/60 were well up (probably because Kesler became superman).

I wonder if Kesler being moved off the 2nd PP was factor in his decreased production as well. Last year Raymond scored 8 PP goals, while only getting 2 this year.

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jul 31, 2011 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the second unit only getting precious seconds to play probably is the factor, not Kesler.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

He still had 1:22 in PP TOI per game. That’s still a decent amount.

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on Jul 31, 2011 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

But he just skates...

fast, but isn’t that all Mayray does? Hansen isn’t far off Raymond’s speed and is more willing to do the dirty work in the corners. I’d take Hansen over Raymond any day. Oh, and Kesler is just as fast. I say dispense with Raymond unless he can put up some real numbers this year when he returns, and look for a better finisher or at least someone who can administer a check.

by peanutflower on Jul 31, 2011 10:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Raymond does more than just skate fast

He’s a pretty good two way forward, he gets off lots of shots, and when he drives the net he can be a decent goal scorer.

He is undersized though, and he doesn’t crash much, and last year he didn’t show his offensive flair as much as I would have liked. Maybe he was hurt? Either way, i’d be okay with him being used for trade bait. I think though that if you were looking to trade him for a big power forward he would have to be part of a package deal. Unless maybe the other team was looking to dump salary.

Raymond for Hartnell perhaps?

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can think of a few teams that would like him if we don’t. Heck, I still want to keep him would like him to find the back of the net once more. But I agree, with the amount of goals he had last year, Hansen is a better player then Raymond.

that said, I think the Sharks, among others, would appreciate his speed and penalty killing ability.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would be okay with Raymond for Clowe : )

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’d love to have Clowe, but I wouldn’t want to make the Sharks any faster.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

god I hate the bashing these two guys get.

They’re good at what they do. they know their weaknesses and play within them. Alberts is even one who improves on his.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

*know their weaknesses, and play to their strengths.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry, they're the slowest d-men we've got

and I’ve seen what Raymond does to slow d-men when he catches them flat-footed.

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yup.

Biggest reason why I like Alberts to stay close to home – he really can get burned on the outside.

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Jul 31, 2011 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would be okay with Raymond for Clowe : )

Yep, I’d do it.

Nucks Misconduct Contributor
We chew and spit you out. We laugh, you scream and shout. All flee, with fear you run. You’ll know where we come from:
Damage incorporated.........GO!

by Sean Zandberg on Aug 1, 2011 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Doug Wilson

wouldn’t.

I'll do it tomorrow, that seems like a pretty good idea to me
What's wrong with tomorrow, I'm watching him but who's watching me?

by Smoboy41 on Aug 1, 2011 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Even as we get to August

Rozner can’t go a co9lumn without a shot at the Canuck fans…so sad from a supposed journalist

Tweet street
The fact that Canucks fans already are preoccupied with Carcillo is a decent indication that the Hawks signed the right guy.

Preoccupied Barry? More like we are laughing at the assumption that ONLY the Hawks can get this guy under control.

Its fun to see him rationalize it.

Laughing at, not with Barry….

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Jul 31, 2011 1:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Carcillo's a joke

Chicago will be a worse team with him on the ice. They’ve got the right idea with Bolland and his linemates matching up against the Sedins. Carcillo’s sideshow will only upset the balance, leaving Hank and Dank to feast on the ensuing power plays.

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Carcillo is a stupid shithead

I look forward to scoring on the many power play opportunities he will afford us.

"You don't have to be smart to laugh at farts but you have to be stupid not to" - Louis CK
Soon we must all face the choice between what is right, and what is easy.
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).

by Chuckles Canuckles on Jul 31, 2011 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

you guys sound pretty "preoccupied"

LOL

I just laugh at the arrogance of the article, that ONLY a coach like Q’ can succeed when others failed.

With the threat of not playing him! So fucking original Barry. Like Laviolette did not already try that…

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Jul 31, 2011 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

stop paying attention to this guy

I know he’s absurd but he gets a kick out of us paying attention to him.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its fun Wisp

And no one but the most idiotic Hawks fan says anything good about Rozner. Hell, even the majority of SCH guys think he is a sad little man…

Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. "For true believers, the bile you spew is our fuel, and when the Canucks raise the Cup next year, we shall drink it, mixed with your tears like the sweetest wine." WAACH' 6/26/11

by vancitydan on Jul 31, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was about to say

Dan brings it up to laugh, then everyone starts talking about how he will be a non-factor lol…

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 1, 2011 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Um, what?

Is there a “preoccupied” joke meme going around? Chicago gets goons… So?

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Jul 31, 2011 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

He can play on a line

with John Scott and they can call it the cement line.

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 1, 2011 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

"You don't have to be smart to laugh at farts but you have to be stupid not to" - Louis CK
Soon we must all face the choice between what is right, and what is easy.
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).

by Chuckles Canuckles on Aug 1, 2011 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

bazinga!

<3 Boobies!
#WinitWithManny
notafullcolon CS: Well obviously I meant we were snorting blow off hookers at the time of the goal

by Canuckles on Aug 1, 2011 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

About Tanev… I don’t see him sent back to the minors, it’s a matter of motivation: the guy played 3 months in the NHL (yes, due to cap and injury consideration but still) and in 3 scf games… and didn’t disappoint. Throw him with Edler. I could easily see him with some of the EV minutes of Erhoff.
Rhaa #isitoctoberyet?

by BECanucks on Jul 31, 2011 6:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Tanev is a nice surprise, because he is basically a ready made rookie to step in for Salo, who is on the verge of retirement. They even play the same side. He just needs to develop a hard shot.

I think if Tanev has a strong camp, and he probably will – he has the best shot of making the team of any rookie and he has to know that – he makes the team. AV is a coach that gives roster spots to players who deserve them, regardless of pedigree, contracts.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he’ll start the season with the Wolves again (for salary cap and waiver wire reasons) and work his way in as guys get injured.

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t get me wrong, I think talent wise he should be in the top six defencemen for the Canucks, and I think in the next few years (3-4) we’ll see him regularly filling a position in the top four (depending on injuries). I believe though, that barring absolute brilliance in training camp, he’ll be slotted in at the 8th or 9th spot on the depth chart because of the nature of his contract.

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

the thing is

He’s pretty well positioned to have that brilliant camp.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not so sure.

I think he has the ability to make the team right now, but the question is whether he should develop into a #1 role with Chicago first – we have offensive blue-liners up on the Canucks, so there’s no need to rush him or put him in a role that there are already better players in.

He starts picking up points in camp, all bets are off!

Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by Thursday on Jul 31, 2011 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

“with Chicago” is a phrase that keeps making me cringe. I think “No, don’t trade him to them!” every time.

by Wisp on Aug 1, 2011 12:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

the thing is

He’s pretty well positioned to have that brilliant camp.

by Wisp on Jul 31, 2011 8:00 PM PDT reply actions  

that would be freakin’ awesome.

by Sandwich76 on Jul 31, 2011 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Nucks Misconduct community! We scour the web to promptly bring you all of the Vancouver Canucks news when it happens in highly-opinionated fashion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

P5205184_small
You just can't make this stuff up!  Vigneault-Kesler-Gillis-Luongo
Elmo1_small
The Role of the Coach
Small
I had a dream
Small
Sell High on Hansen?
Small
If Vigneault Does Not Return?
Dsc01373_small
Let's Stop Maligning the President's Trophy
Small
Luongo? Schneider? How about trade both?
Elmo1_small
Many issues wrapped into one…
Small
Individual Canuck Projections
Small
An apology to Luongo from an appreciative fan

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Nucks Misconduct Store

Nmstore_thumb_medium
Your clothing sucks. Go fix it.

Canucks Stats

Stat

Forwards

Defense

Points

H. Sedin (72)

Edler (45)

Goals

D. Sedin (30)

Edler (11)

Assists

H. Sedin (59)

Edler (34)

Shots

D. Sedin (229)

Edler (212)

Hits

Lapierre (217)

Bieksa (148)

Blocked Shots

Kesler (56)

Edler (120)

ES TOI/G

D. Sedin (14.46)

Bieksa (18.22)

PP TOI/G

D. Sedin (3.21)

Edler (3.25)

PK TOI/G

Malhotra (2.42)

Hamhuis (2.88)

Corsi Rel QoC

Pahlsson (1.008)

Bieksa (0.875)

Zone Starts (OPCT)

D. Sedin (80%)
Malhotra (12%)

Edler (58%)
Alberts (40%)

Updated: March 24


Bartenders

Jasonmask_small Yankee Canuck

Stfulou_small Sean Zandberg

Keslerbomb2_small Kent Basky

Pub Regulars

Edlermirrorreversed_small missy

Rnxbd00z_small vancitydan

Img_8090_small nucksandpucks

Screen_shot_2011-11-27_at_11 Jordan Clarke

299352_525780999561_106000039_30560322_1772728798_n_small Ggooglyboogly

4-eyes_small DanTheStatMan1