Stanley Cup Finals Game 5: Calling Chris Tanev! Wee Man, back in your hole...
OMG. I'm starting to understand this whole Keith Ballard, Aaron Rome / AV thing. I used to think that perhaps Romer was AV's mystery "love child" from some freaky trip AV made to the prairies playing Junior B circa 1983 - But now I TOTALLY get it!!!! Keith Ballard is simply out of his depth right now. Granted, Wee man (as I affectionately refer to him) has been sitting long enough that it's normal that he's lost a step (or 3) and coming into game 4 of a heated series playing for the Stanley Cup, you can cut him a little bit of slack. A LITTLE. But, with Ballard's horrendous play in Game 4 when the Nucks needed him most, I shall demonstrate in true QED fashion post-jump with compelling gorilla logic that AV simply has NO CHOICE but to pull him and put Tanev in. The Wookie, Andrew Alberts played great tonight, and Hammer is most obv. down for the count, so PLEEEAAASE AV - Put him IN coach. Chris Tanev is ready to play, all 185 lbs (soaking wet) of his charmed one-year-removed-from-stalking RIT hiney.
So, facing game 4 AV had choices. He couldA) Plug Ballard in - After all, on the surface, Wee man has been the consummate "good soldier", saying all the right things and biding his time - More about that in a bit... or
B) Put Wee man in WITH Tanev - Given AV's logic in the last two games of the Western Conference finals, that "Keith played his best hockey this year playing with Chris"
C) Put Chris Tanev in
Obviously, we now know what AV *wishes* he'd done - Because make no mistake - there is no way that a torqued up Chris Tanev, after the freakish composure he's shown TIME AND AGAIN, could have played worse.
Yes, he's as skinny as a school girl with a complex. True, at this point he has next to zero offensive upside as was evidenced by his short time on the PP in San Jose, and the way he passed off even when he had an open shot. Yes, he's an unknown *somewhat* in the sense that he has yet to play on the BIGGEST stage and perform as he has all year - but until he's given the chance, why not give him the benefit of the doubt, given the UPSIDE.
He's a kid. Even he simply doesn't even know how good he can really be. Those who DO have some whiskers and should be in the know, former coaches and scouts etc., say that he'll soon be quarterbacking the Nucks powerplay. But right there, right now he's shown GIGANTIC puppy paws with his ability to:
1) Move the puck with the first pass-ability of a seasoned 4 Million dollar a year blueliner. Sammy and Juice could take a page from his book at times... And compared to Chris T, Hoff really earns the epithet "Errorhoffer"
2) Not panic, EVER. This kid drinks Hot Chocolate and pisses ice cubes. Simple. Anyone who's paid the least bit of attention can attest to the fact that he simply NEVER panics with the puck. He has a world-class ability to hang on and make a heads up pass.
3) He doesn't make many mistakes at ALL -and those that he HAS made, are easily attributed to the fact that he had to MAKE *some* (albeit practically imperceptible) adjustments to the speed of the "Show". But he also stepped into a real series in the WCF and performed like he has ALL year long - Like a champ.
What you have in comparing Ballard and Tanev, is someone who STILL has a Napolean Complex, and someone who has, quite literally, grown out of his.
Ballard was brought in and paid over 4 million bones per year to bring superior puck moving and OFFENSIVE ability. He managed over 30 points last year with a basement team. Granted, he was a much bigger fish in a smaller pond in FL, but he was certainly expected to adjust better than he has, and the numbers he put up, 2&5 for 7 points total just aren't acceptable. I have a suspicion, and of course, it's pure speculation, that there's more to the whole story.
I think it's highly likely that around late Feb, early March, the Suits and AV sat Keith down for a little "come to Jesus" meeting. They challenged him at that point and told him to step up and earn that fat paycheck, or there would be consequences come playoff time, just like there were regular season. Obviously, he didn't answer the bell. His "good soldier" routine notwithstanding, I and many others have spent hours in idle speculation wondering precisely *what* it is that has caused AV to bench such a high priced asset.
Not anymore. It's painfully obvious. With Wee man's offensive ability dried up like the hind teat of sow nursing 2 litters, he simply lacks the physicality and mental toughness to contribute when the Canucks need him most. Throwing the occasional hip check just doesn't cut it. And the liability that Wee Man brings to the game was never more evident than tonight, when he lay down behind his OWN NET and simple gave Boston the goal that broke the Canucks back.
Goal 3, Mr. Ballard, was on YOU.
.The Wookie played great tonight, and it doesn't matter that he's not the most fleet of foot. Alberts has shown that he deserves to stay in for game 5. But not Keith Ballard, aka - Wee man. He's shown this writer at least, that AV had very good reasons for sitting him. So, AV - Give the kid a chance. He's earned it! Put him in Coach.
6 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You're overstating what Tanev has done this season by a lot
and you’re understating what AV has done to Ballards confidence. Which at the NHL level is everything. Imagine if you played hockey and you knew that anytime you made a mistake you’d be sitting the next game. Even if that mistake was the same mistake other players beside you make on a routine basis. You are one of two people, you either say “fuck the coach, what does he know?” Or, like Ballard, “I need to re-think how I play and maybe i’ll get another shot” The problem is guy number 2 sounds great but he second guesses everything he does. He doesn’t play in the moment because he’s over thinking the game. Which is exactly what Ballard was doing last night. It’s one thing if you’re a fringe player like Alberts or Rome who are just excited to play any chance they get. It’s a very different thing when you’re a top Dman in the league and you make 4.5 million. He didn’t get that money playing like he did last night. AV’s mismanagement of his defensive core has made Ballard a far less useful player.
+1
"I'll see you guys on the flippity flop" - Michael Scott
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).
by Chuckles Canuckles on Jun 10, 2011 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks guys
Hey all – Thanks a lot for taking the time to read my rant, and even better, to pipe up with your opinion. I’m new here and it’s nice to get feedback.
Canucklehead – Point well taken. I don’t think I said much at all about the effect AV’s non-confidence vote would have on a player – I was certainly very harsh on Mr. Ballard – I actually like him a lot on a personal level – He’s been a good trooper, as I’ve given him credit for, AND he’s also stepped in and played some quality minutes on demand, not an easy thing to do when you have AV’s full confidence, let alone his (possible) thinly veiled contempt.
Look – Ballard isn’t going anywhere. After this season, IMO the only option is to nurture him along as the Nucks have been so adept at doing with any other “project”. Funny that this unit excels at getting max value out of “projects” like Lapierre, Higgins etc. and they finally pony up for grade-a beef, as it were, and have issues – But if there’s anywhere KB can make a turnaround back to his former stature, it’s in Van. What other option do they have other than a buyout?
So… I want to be clear – I was pretty harsh on KB, but I’m also very high on Tanev, obviously – I really do think this guy is an absolute gem. Seeing his play tonight did nothing to change my mind – au contraire, I’m simply in awe of his ability to step up. If you can step up and play the minutes he played tonight on this stage at this time when you’re 21!!!!!! then there is simply no limit at this point to his upside.
I really wish KB well, and hope he’s able to contribute big time next year – but even with the qualifiers and your well-taken point that it’s soul-crushing to have your coach treat you like a pariah, it still doesn’t change the fact that the Nucks simply haven’t gotten what they bargained for in Ballard – yet. Next year we keep him, obv, promote Tanev to an 82 game player, let Salo go with a grand salute, and (Pray to god) resign juice and hoff.
Dude
Great post. I have thought the same about Tanev, and the “pissing ice cubes” line made me laugh.
The game he had, your post was spot on. Not sure what the unknown is with Ballar’, but whether or not that deal is or was a good one is a story for the summer. I think Keith will at least have his name on the Cup right? The team has shown, with Juice this year, that they don’t always go with the “popular opinion” on anything…
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod. LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.........
Keith Ballard
When Ballard gets dealt next season, he’ll return to Florida form.
Gillis was brilliant in the off-season but not infallible. Sometimes certain players flourish or flounder under certain coaching staffs. If the Nucks win the CUP, Ballard won’t feel like he was part of the team. Ballard probably hates AV with a passion for alienating him from the team.

by 















