Sharks At Canucks Game 1 Preview: Pounding Out Aggression Turns Into Obsession
| SHARKS |
CANUCKS | ||||
|
AT | |
|||
| Time | Sun. 5:00 PM PST |
TV | CBC, Versus, RDS |
| Season Series | 3-0-1 Canucks |
Last Meeting |
5-4 Canucks |
| The Enemy | Fear The Fin, Battle Of California | Scoring Leaders | Kesler: 5-10-15 Clowe: 4-9-13 |
| Sharks |
Category | Canucks |
| Won 1 |
Streak | Won 1 |
| 4-2 |
< Road Record / Home Record > |
4-3 |
| 0 |
Goals For / Against +/- | -3 |
| 2.92 (7) |
Goals Per Game | 2.31 (14) |
| 2.92 (10) |
Goals Against Per Game | 2.54 (5) |
| 1.04 (7) |
5 On 5 GF/GA | 0.86 (10) |
| 13.7 (13) |
Power Play % |
22.2 (5) |
| 82.7 (7) |
Penalty Kill % |
86.0 (5) |
| 36.5 (2) |
Shots Per Game | 31.5 (8) |
| 32.0 (9) |
Shots Against Per Game | 29.2 (3) |
| 75.0 |
Winning % When Scoring First | 75.0 |
| 3-1 |
Record When Leading After 1 | 4-2 |
| 2-3 |
Record When Trailing After 1 | 2-1 |
| 4-1 |
Record When Leading After 2 | 6-1 |
| 363 (2) |
Hits | 436 (1) |
| 241 (1) |
Blocked Shots |
164 (7) |
| 53.7 (1) |
Faceoffs % | 51.2 (5) |
| 13.5 (11) |
PIM's Per Game Average |
13.7 (12) |
| NHL.com |
It's. About. Time. Much too long of a wait between series for us fans. This series is projected to be a beauty and I agree. Lots of aggression. The teams are ranked 1 and 2 in the playoffs in that category. Lots of goals? That remains to be seen. I get the feeling that these games will be more low-scoring and close. Do the Sharks focus more on Ryan Kesler and thus give the Sedins more room? How will San Jose's obvious edge in forward depth stack up against the Canucks' superior depth on defence? The Preds' forwards were rolling in the Anaheim series and then nearly all of them (except for Joel Ward) dried up against the checking Canucks. The Canucks have potted a lot of goals against Antti Niemi over the past 2 seasons plus the playoffs last season. Let's see if they can continue that. First thing that comes to my mind is "thank god he's no Pekka Rinne". The Sharks are still stinking of game action and the Canucks have had 5 days off. Does that play a roll? It looked didn't look like it in Boston Saturday night.
Roberto Luongo is going to see a lot more shots against San Jose than he did against Nashville, and that's just fine by him. He may just need to steal this game early until the Canucks get their legs going. Maybe not.
A surprising stat on the table above is the Sharks' futility on the power play. Wow. I like the Canucks' success in that category, and their PK dominance. Look at the Sharks' blocked shots totals. Tops in the League in these playoffs. We'll see how that plays out. This series is going the distance, so get your alcohol or whatever else you do/use to soothe your fraying nerves ready. I honestly don't know who is going to win this series. I do know that there are several Canucks that need to start scoring more (ahem Dank, Raymond, Burrows, Hansen and even Lapierre). Secondary and tertiary scoring. Get it done. No way the KesLord keeps up the pace like he did against the Predators.
For anyone new here, we have a little score-predicting competition going on. In the comments section of this post (only in game preview posts) you can predict the score of the game, the winning team and the game winning goal scorer. See the lower left sidebar on our main page for the leaderboard. If you are unsure of how the points system works feel free to ask in the comments section.
LINKS
-The Kurtenbloggers ask the guys from Fear The Fin a few questions about the Sharks.
-Yankee Canucks previews the Sharks.
-Vancouver's Mayor announces on Twitter: @MayorGregor: Just confirmed @CBCVancouver & City showing #Canucks games on big screen downtown for rest of playoffs @ Georgia/Hamilton!
-Welly The Weasel. Kevin Bieksa serves up some more gold. (The Province)
-Wellwood eats crow..kinda. (Globe and Mail)
-Looks like Oreskovich in and Tambellini out for Game 1. (Vancouver Sun) Sweet! Oreo is a beast.
-Sharks Run Deep (Globe and Mail)
-Puck Daddy crew make their predictions for Round 3. All of them pick the Canucks. Most people are.
-Joe Thornton leading the charge (Fear The Fin).
PROJECTED FORWARDS DRESSED
CANUCKS
Daniel Sedin-Henrik Sedin-Alexandre Burrows
Mason Raymond-Ryan Kesler-Christopher Higgins
Raffi Torres-Maxim Lapierre-Jannik Hansen
Victor Oreskovich-Cody Hodgson-Tanner Glass
SHARKS
Patrick Marleau-Joe Thornton-Devin Setoguchi
Ryane Clowe-Logan Couture-Dany Heatley
Torrey Mitchell-Joe Pavelski-Sir Finebark of the Woodshire
Ben Eager-Scott Nichol-Benn Ferrioro/Jamal Mayers
STARTING GOALTENDERS
WHO IS HOT / COLD
CANUCKS
HOT
-Ryan Kesler: 5 goals and 6 assists in his last 5. Beast mode.
-Mason Raymond: 1 goal and 1 assist in his last 2. Maybe he's about to break out.
-Henrik Sedin: 1 goal and 3 assists in his last 3.
COLD
-Maxim Lapierre: 1 assist in his last 23 games.
-Tanner Glass: 0 points in his last 24.
-Alex Burrows: 1 assist in his last 4.
-Jannik Hansen: 1 assist in his last 11 games
SHARKS
HOT
-Logan Couture: 4 goals and 1 assist in his last 4 games.
-Dan Boyle: 2 goals and 4 assists in his last 5 games.
-Devin Setoguchi: 1 goal and 1 assist in Game 7 vs Detroit.
COLD
INJURIES
CANUCKS
-F Manny Malhotra: eye, out for playoffs
-F Mikael Samuelsson: lower body. Will not play in game 1.
SHARKS
-D Kent Huskins: upper body. Out since Feb. 22
VIDEO
The last meeting...a beauty...if you enjoy watching the Canucks blowing leads:
The title of this post is brought to you by Metallica "Battery". Yes, I'm going back to Metallica because they kick ass.


155 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It looked like it in Boston Saturday night.
Sean…the Lightning had more days off than the Bruins…
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
yeah I knew that. Just seeing if you’re paying attention
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 14, 2011 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
It's okay
You’ve had some time off. Need to work out the rust ;)
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Momentum is bullshit
Momentum is bullshit
Momentum is bullshit
/rinse, repeat, add same premise to “rest”
What are you talking about?
Obviously the Lightening had momentum from their 10 days off!
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Canucks 85 for 4 overs.
Whoops! Watching too much IPL!
4-1 Canucks. Kesler.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
Although technically the score doesn’t make any sense :P
If I had a gun with two bullets, and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden and Toby, I would shoot Toby twice.
Don't watch enough
I guess. 85 runs in 4 overs is good though right? Or is it supposed to be 4 wickets?
Still figuring some shit out with that crazy sport.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
If you say 85 for 4 it’s 4 wickets. 85 runs in 4 overs is almost impossible – 21 runs an over. Don’t think even in IPL that’s possible, that would be a score of 420 in 20 overs, when they usually get over 200 if it’s a good day…
I saw a guy last night
Who got over that 21. An over is 6 balls right? He had 2 sixes and 4 fours…
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
5-1 Ehrhoff
Don't drink and park, accidents cause people!
If it ain't got a packet, go home and whack it.
I'm just a loser geek, crazy with an evil streak! -- everclear
4-2 Canucks/Higgins
"Why are we so quick to blame? What is the attraction in that?" - Carmela Soprano
2-0 Higgins
Just because
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Just because
You’re a copycat ;)
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 10:14 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
You said 3-0
I said 2-0! And of course Higgins has to get the winner, he’s got all of the ones in Game 1 so far!
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
I keed, I keed.
It’s a genius prediction. Any rational hockey fan would come to a similar independent conclusion.
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
2-1 Canucks
Keslord GWG
"I'll see you guys on the flippity flop" - Michael Scott
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).
by Chuckles Canuckles on May 14, 2011 10:54 PM PDT reply actions
3-1 Nucks
Higgins scores somewhere in there, but GWG goes to Burr.
"He does things for the right reasons...He doesn't do it for the photo op. He's everything that's good about hockey." -San Jose GM Doug Wilson, about Manny
It's the same old story. Boy finds girl, boy loses girl, girl finds boy, boy forgets girl, boy remembers girl, girl dies in a tragic blimp accident over the Orange Bowl on New Year's Day. - the late, great Leslie Nielsen
The lead singer of Metallica has season tix to SJ I think
It’s about 80% of what is played at the Tank haha
"You can't stop him, you can only hope to contain Kent Huskins!" - Randy Hahn 2/13/11
I thought he was a Kings fan. Seen him at games there.
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
Maybe but I know he has season tix to Sharks
"You can't stop him, you can only hope to contain Kent Huskins!" - Randy Hahn 2/13/11
by pooponastick on May 15, 2011 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I thought you said basically you weren’t sure
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
4-3 Nucks
The Professor for the winner.
by Tink for Nucks on May 15, 2011 12:24 AM PDT reply actions
4-2
Nucks. Juice GWG.
Just call me Ili.
First user of the acronym TSP.
Two down, two to go.
Follow me: http://twitter.com/#!/TXCanucklehead
by TXCanucklehead on May 15, 2011 12:53 AM PDT reply actions
Is that Boyle goal into our net or theirs?
by CdP on May 15, 2011 6:31 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
3-1 higgins
If I had a gun with two bullets, and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden and Toby, I would shoot Toby twice.
5-3 AMFB
The glory of free wheeling hockey returns!
Everytime I meet a new person, I figure out how I’m gonna fight them
-Jack Donaghy
by cyclone's ghost on May 15, 2011 3:24 AM PDT reply actions
I’d just like to take this opportunity to wish you guys the best of luck for the series ahead (although obviously not so much that you actually go and win the damn thing).
It should be real firecracker. And hopefully the start of a Pacific coast rivalry between the two teams in the future.
Here’s to some great hockey and some great banter between the two fanbases, and may the best team (the Sharks) win!
And you think you live in a non-traditional hockey market...
Randy Hahn: "That is one angry Swedish person."
"I flew 5,000 miles for this?"
And if you want more of this kind of thing, I'm spouting nonsense on Twitter too...
Go Vancouver.
I’d love to see a sweep and Kesler make Thornton cry. :)
Random Ramblings from a Somewhat Scattered Mind
"It is a mistake to try to look too far ahead. The chain of destiny can only be grasped one link at a time." --Sir Winston Churchill (1874 – 1965)
THIS
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
"Pucks are awful little things" - Passive Voice.
by Yankee Canuck on May 15, 2011 6:50 AM PDT up reply actions
Go Nucks
My Linden replica sweater is still stinking since 94 and I wore it on stage last weekend and the singer of !!! wore it on stage two years ago and I wore it on stage the weekend after that and my playoff beard is looking great and is popular with the women AND men…….
8-2 Home team wins!!
Hansen
make those men in teal KNEEL!!!
by 40 years and counting on May 15, 2011 6:16 AM PDT reply actions
easy on that Pacific Coast rivalry thing
In the Big Chi, we claim the rights to one of the best rivalries in the NHL right now, back off Shark fans in your weak teal colored uniforms. I’m surprised Nemo isn’t your logo.
There’s only two thing’s I like about the Sharks. First, Doug Wilson, one of the greatest defenseman in Blackhawk history. Althoug I can’t recall many #24 bouts, a friend once pointed out to me how often when he was hit, or hit somebody, they ended up on the ice. Huge slapshot. How he didn’t retire a Hawk I’ll never know. (I thinkm it had something to do with “Dollar Bill Wirtz.” Good thing the saying, “Like father, like son,” proved untrue in Rocky’s case, although i wish he’d stop raising season ticket prices.
Secondly, Antti Niemi. After he was scooped up by the Sharks this past summer, several Blackhawk fans had a "so what’ type attitude and he’s not worth millions of dollars. he was a huge part of the Blackhawks hoisting the cup last year. several sportswriters were saying he was blessed with so many good players in front of him. There was one shot that I recall in our very fortunate sweep of the Sharks last year. It was in OT of Game 3 at thje U. C. Patrick Marleau found the puck in our slot with nary one of those great players anywhere in sight and sent a twisted wrister at out Fabulous Finn. the puck hit Niemi in the face mask – an inch or two either way and the sharks win Game 3. The incredible thing was, Antti never even flinched. Instead, minutes later, Bolland fed Big Buff the puck as he cruised in up the slot. I can still see Douglas Murray’s disgruntled look as realized nabokov couldn’t bail his butt out again.
Thing’s not to like about San Jose – Jumbo Joe Thorton – what a nozzle. In game 6 vs. the Wings, he’s the last one to come into the picture in that wild goal mouth scramble with 10 seconds left. So does he grab someone away from the melee – no he slashes the back of Zetterber’s leg where there’s no padding. If any of you Canuck fans are worried about JJT, recall how the diminutive and lovable Dave Bolland dominated him last year. i’m thinking Kesler is a “slight” notch above “Bollsy.”
To me, it’s looking more and more like this is Vancouver’s time to shine in the sun.
Oh, by the way, I kinda wish Couture was a Blackhawk
by wardrums on May 15, 2011 6:18 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Typical hawks fan
Finds a way to spend a whole comment in a series they have nothing to do with talking about the hawks Stanley cup run. We get it you won the cup, but the hawks aren’t playing anymore this year.
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 10:18 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I'm just giving him a hard time
But he could’ve saved himself some typing and just said this:
To me, it’s looking more and more like this is Vancouver’s time to shine in the sun.
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions
wardrum is cool
Tough to know with the Hawks fans that were soiling the sheets before.
He’s OK though CH.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
Welcome back. Like the prediction.
Wouldn’t suppose you’re actually cheering for Van, rather than predicting?
Anyways, nice post, as always.
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
IF YOU WE'RE PLAYING THE WINGS IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A TOSS UP.
Actually got excited tonight cheering for the Nucks. my daughter is about to disown me. I’ll be honest, I was pulling for the Pred’s – now unequivocally Vancouver. The men in the green and blue are actually fun to watch when you’re puliing for them. They tend to dominate things out there. incredible speed and pressure.
Quite frankly, they seem to have all the ingredients to “do this thing.” as I watched the third period tonight, I thought to myself "How the hell did the blackhawks take that series 7 games?
I was wondering if the Canucks were going to be as physical against the Sharks who definitelly are bigger than the team Canucklehead says I can’t mention anymore. They keep that hitting up I really don’t see any of the four teams left hanging with you guys. Of course the team I won’t mention anymore will be kicking yo ass next season!
Canucklehead, I can’t watch these games as an impartial observer,Unless your the dogged victim of inexorable fate, I’m on the bandwagon of the next Stanley Cup Champs.
I’m not sure who I dislike more…thorntonchoker or mr. vehicular homicide. You don’t have to hate Marleau, he does it to himself and that’s what really hurts.
by CdP on May 15, 2011 6:25 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I almost forgot
nucks 4 – Hammerheads 2 (don’t think it’s going like fishing for bass on some placid pond though – the fourth gaol is an empty netter either by 14 or 17.
This is what worried me last offseason with the Canucks when the focus was 100% on the defense
Gillis seemed to forget that last offseason that the Canucks were just a few penalty trains and disastrous mental breakdowns from dominating the Blackhawks, or at least going up 2-0 on them. And those two games, the Canucks really outplayed the Blackhawks, suspect defense and all. And that was because of the forward depth. For all the flack Wellwood gets, he’s a really, really solid player. And Pavol Demitra brought a ton more creativity and vision and skating to this team. Not to mention Grabner.
I was worried that if Gillis focused just on improving the defense, he would forget about the need for forward depth, and he would sacrifice that forward depth for the defense. Luckily, at the deadline, that Higgins addition especially helped that, to an extent. However, the Canucks still have Higgins and Raymond where they have Clowe and Setoguchi, and even healthy, the Canucks have Malhotra where they have Pavelski.
And that’s what I’d be worried about if I’m rooting for the Canucks. In past seasons, you could kind of predict the Cup winner pretty easily, because there was always this one team who had the best defense, and the best forwards. Chicago last year, Detroit the year before with Hossa (until they got fatigued or outcoached by Pittsburgh, who was up there). Detroit certainly the year before that. Anaheim the year before. And that was what Vancouver was shaping up to be this season after Chicago dismantled. You sign Hamhuis for 4.5 million, Grabner is just going to be even better this season, maybe you re-sign Wellwood, or you spend that spare 4 million you have left after Malhotra and Torres (in lieu of Ballard) on a Mathieu Lombardi, or a Matt Cullen, or an Alex Tanguay and another 2 million dollar forward who is even better than those guys, who I don’t know about but who the wiser Gillis would know of, and there you have it, best top 9 in the NHL (or at least it’s as good as anyone elses), best defense corps, and you’re the champs.
But now, it’s not like past years. Vancouver has the deepest defense, and one of the better top 9s in the league, but San Jose’s top 9 might be better, and they have an underrated defense that people are looking over. And now it’s a question of which will prevail. Some people think Vancouver still has the advantage, and they very well might. But if I’m a vancouver fan, it’s a little close for comfort. If you have the better forwards and the better defense, I mean now you’re really set. Something is really going to have to go badly for you not to win the Cup. But with only one of the two, it leaves more room for doubt. And especially when you look at the past cup teams, I mean has been proven in the playoffs that if most your offense comes from just a few guys, that can be shut down. You need that depth. And Vancouver is very top heavy with the Sedins and Kesler. And you look at the last few Cup teams, I mean Higgins has been a good add by Vancouver, but he wouldn’t be good enough to play on the 2nd line of those past teams. And Raymond is still really learning the game, and doesn’t really do the little things well enoguh right now to score consistently. He doesn’t get the garbage goals, the tip-ins, the ones off the cycle, and all that. He’s very skilled but there’s a disconnect between his skill and his production because he doesn’t do the little things.
And then you have Maxin Lapierre and Raffi Torres on your 3rd line. Not exactly elite. Hansen also, underrated player but he’s not Ladd or Bolland or whoever else.
So, I have conflicted feelings abotu this series. I’m rooting for you guys, but the qustion for me with this Van team all year long was forward depth, and I still have big concerns there, especially with Samuelsson out, I mean he was a huge key for me with this team.
However, I still think Vancouver can win, but they have to find ways to exploit San Jose with their speed. Having it is one thing, but it doesn’t make as big a difference unelss you really set up the tactics to use it constantly. I’m talking stretch passes, just stretching out of the defensive zone in general even when you haven’t cleared yet, just so San Jose can’t pinch every time. Because they love to do that. Their 3rd forward always comes high, and their dmen pinch, and it’s really hard to get the puck out. You’re already under pressure by a low forward, you barely have the puck, or it’s on your backhand, and this defenseman is baring down on you with no inhibition because he knows he ahs cover from the 3rd forward high. You just can’t let them do that. They’ve been a very good team at coming from behind in part because they really start to get aggressive in that way, and it really works. It becomes so hard to clear the zone. So you have to stretch them. Before they even pinch, you just start skating out of the zone, get behind them, and you’re basically tellign them, hey, you wanna pinch, sure, maybe the puck will come to you, and I’ll get caught out, but I’ll still have 4 of my buddies covering there, and you probably won’t score. But, if it bounces by you, you’re in deep shit, because I’ve got a 2 on1 or a breakaway, and I have a much better chance of scoring.
So that’s a key tactical thing.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 6:39 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I appreciate some of your points, especially on the Ballard/Grabner trade. But I would take issue with Demitra and Wellwood being any sort of loss to the team.
Here’s a fact: If Wellwood were still on VAN, he would be a healthy scratch. Too soft for the playoffs, GMMG went out and got tougher 3rd and 4th lines given the differing style of playoff hockey. You can debate the merit of that philosophy, but that is the plan in 2011 and there’s no place for him on our team.
As for Demitra, he was a creative playmaker 5 years ago but the 2010 version was an unproductive defensive liability. Remember that turnover at the blueline against CHI last year?
by CdP on May 15, 2011 7:01 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Well
I agree about Demitra. I mean he was a mixed bag. This team ahd trouble defensively. But when it came to offense, he was one of those many skill guys that just created that whole, overwhelm you with skill type of thing, kind of like the Canucks have an overwhelm you with speed type of thing now. He may not have been a great player, but he had that creative, skating, stickhandling skillset that just kind of piled on top of the other skilled players, and it created that kind of depth team on offense.
As for Wellwood, obviously a lot of Vancouver fans don’t like him. They just don’t so I understand why you’re saying he’s bad, but he’s been fricken fantastic for San Jose since they got him, including in the playoffs. He hasn’t been too soft at all, and his good hoceky sense at both ends of the ice, his offensive vision, his stickhandling, his agility, his decision making, his creativity, all of that has really transformed their 3rd line. Pavelski gets all the credit for that 3rd line, but he wouldn’t have much success with Torrey Mitchell and another grinder with not much skill or creativitity. In fact i dont think Pavelski really produced veyr well at all until they got Wellwood. Then Pavelski was basically a point per game player on the 3rd line. Wellwood has been fantastic. The Canucks could really use him. Maybe you’re saying he’s too soft to be a center in the playoffs.. because now he’s playing right wing, with Pavelski taking care of the more grittier aspects of defense. Anyway Vancouver could certainly use him. Vision like that just makes everyone better.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Anyone still bashing Wellwood has not been watching Sharks playoff games this year. He is a solid addition in their bottom 6. Haters will start realizing that in Game 1. jacktheboxboss raises some excellent points. Right now the Canucks are not deep enough up front. I’m not comfortable with that either. However, I’m still waiting for Hansen-Lapierre-Torres to cash in more. It’s not like they don’t have the ability. Until they do, then jack is right…the Canucks are top heavy in that sense. Hell, maybe that’s good enough. But I look at what Bergenheim-Moore-Downie are doing in Tampa…you see THAT is scary stuff right there. Where the hell did they come from?! Outstanding. Canucks don’t have that tertiary scoring..yet.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
And if Manny didn’t get injured I probably wouldn’t be as concerned. Manny>Woody obviously.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions
And this is where Samuelsson would be key
When Healthy, he can play that Pavelski type role. Fast enough skater, good hockey sense, and is very opportunistic with his accurate shot. He’s that top 6 forward who you can play as a #7 forward against the other team’s 3rd pairing. That’s the depth. Sometimes it’s just having that one extra top 6 forward. I mean that’s what SJ’s claim to fame is right now, that they have 7 top 6 forwards. And with Wellwood it’s really 7.5, and Pavelski, with Wellwood’s help, has made them a 3 line team, when they’ve always been a 2 line team before. Samuelsson could help Vancouver do the same type of thing, if he was healthy.
However, even without Samuelsson, I think if Vigneault just made some changes, he could even those third lines out a bit. Burrows-Lapierre-Tambellini seems like something that could give their 3rd defense pair fits with their speed and puck-handling. Burrows and Lapierre are gritty too. Heck even Hansen-Lapierre-Tambellini. Heck even Hansen-Lapierre-Torres, it’s not doom and gloom necessarily. Everyone would definitely feel more comfortable with a better 3rd line and better depth, and Gillis really, really should have taken care of that, but even as things stand, Hansen and Lapierre can both really skate, they’re really quick, and they have fast hands. In terms of quickness and one-on-one skill, they are better than Pavelski and company. It’s the hockey sense, the passing, playmaking, cyling, finishing, and little things where they may not be as good.
Anyway, hey, we’ll find out. Gillis could have all but guaranteed a Cup win if he’d taken care of the forward depth as he did the defense, but he didn’t. Now Vancouver just has a fair shot at it as opposed to the only legitimate shot at it of any of the teams. Of course every Canuck fan would have preferred the latter but that’s not the case. I did think Lapierre and Hansen both played well at times over the first two series, production or not. I was at times impressed by what I saw when Vigneault rolled three lines. Well, maybe taht was because he was rolling two. It seemed like Kesler was always out there, or the Sedins, or if it was Hansen’s line, Higgins was on it. But regardless I was impressed by just the speed and pace that the lines kept coming at, rolling at, Lapierre and Hansen too. But the thing is Nashville wasn’t really challenging them. They were allowed time to gain speed and play to their strengths.
Well I’m going on and on again lol. We’ll see what happens. But it’s not all doom and gloom. This 3rd line does have some potential.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions
There are no guarantees.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah but you get what I mean
Detroit winning the Cup in 08, with Zetterberg, Datsyuk, Franzen, Lidstrom, Rafalski, and Kronwall all at the top of their games was a lock, “all but guaranteed.” Chicago, last year, I actually thought Vancouver had a chance, but it was either going to be Chicago or Vancouver, “all but guaranteed.”
So that’s what I meant. When you have the best offense and the best defense, it’s all but guaranteed. Unless Niemi was terrible and let in a million soft goals, unless half their team got injured, that sort of thing. And if Vancouver had a better 3rd line than San Jose, I think it would be the same sort of scenario. That’s all I meant.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, I more or less agree with you. Hmm But I wasn’t putting Chicago or Vancouver on any pedestal last season. Sharks and Wings it was for me. But saying a team has the best offence and defence is in the eye of the beholder. On paper? That’s fine and dandy. But the best teams on paper rarely win. At least not nowadays. That’s why I am not totally sold on your Gillis comment. Any Gillis-bashing this summer if the Canucks don’t win is just mostly hindsight BS. And it happens every summer with every team that doesn’t kiss silver.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
And he did address the depth at forward by acquiring Malhotra and Torres. I thought GMMG did a masterful job last summer no matter what happens in these playoffs.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
You can’t foresee (ouch) the kind of injury that Manny had. Gillis did exactly what we needed in the off season: Got defense. Got forward depth. He even got more forward depth at the trade line
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
I agree completely.
GMMG has been fantastic. Look at the deadline deals he made too. Gold. I don’t think we are where we are without those two. Lapierre taking some of Manny’s pk time and fo’s and Higgins being Higgins.
AV on the other hand…..;)
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Im thinking maybe
Gillis overreacted to those belly pictures just like all the fans, because really there was no reason not to sign him. He would have cost league minimum. At the very least, you have the guy for when someone gets injured, you know?
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Those belly pictures came out before he signed him the first time though. It’s probably one of those things where you let a guy go for a particular reason, then that guy works on that a lot and is better on the next team he plays for.
I liked what Welly brought in the playoffs last year – he was, at times, the only one who seemed to care during the Chicago season. But there were so many other disappointing times as well. I really would not have been against having him on the cheap – could have really helped out the 4C position, but for the long run I think having Lapierre there (hopefully we keep him on) and Manny in 3C is better
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
He signed Manny instead
Which was a great move. I would’ve traded Wellwood for Manny in a second.
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes Lapierre on the third line
Isn’t perfect. But that wasn’t what Gillis went out to do out at the start of the year. He got Malhotra for that role, who did wonderfully, but is now unfortunately injured, so now Lapierre has to do because injuries happen.
And I’d rather have Hansen/Lapierre’s backchecking than Demitra’s so called “Creativity” (was that what he did at the point on that shorthanded goal?)
No doubt this series is going to be tough though
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Our top 3 lines with Malhotra would be just as deep, if not deeper than the Sharks. I’m not being a homer either.
Hansen has taken a big step forward, and Torres is useful. Combined with Higgins and Lappy acquisitions, this team could almost legitimately roll 4 lines. If there’s one guy who could match up to Pavelski as a 3C, it’s Manny or J. Staal.
Frequent visitor to Nucks Misconduct.
Got the call to the big leagues!
by Vancouverguy on May 15, 2011 8:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Well
Pavelski is miles better than Malhotra, so I think right of the bat that gives SJ the better third line, because Wellwood is really good and Mitchell is at least fast and physical. But really Pavelski is the huge advantage.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Malhotra is the better checker. Pavelski is the better scorer.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Miles?
Thats a bit much. I like Pavs and all, but he is not the complete hockey player Manny is.
Period. They are totally comparable for value to their teams, just in different ways.
Besides, didn’t Little Joe disappear in the last round? Thats what the MSM TV talking heads were saying on Hockeycentral…for what that is worth.
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
well the way I see it is
Pavelski is, if not as good defensively as Malhotra, he’s not tooo far behind, whereas Pavelski is way ahead of Malhotra offensively. Pavelski is a two-way threat, and Malhotra is mostly just a defensive player.
And no Pavelski didn’t disappear last round. He had the game tying goal in game 1, and at least 1 more I remember later on. Don’t know the assists numbers. And he was good vs LA. I mean he’s been dynamite for them the last two playoff series. “It’s his time of year” says Doug Wilson, that insufferable showman with his fake-tan and stupid one-liners. I don’t remember the respective GMs of these players saying that about Jonathan Toews, or Evgeni Malkin, or Henrik Zetterberg before him, so why Pavelski?
Anyway, even if Doug Wilson likes to exaggerate and talk up all his players and claim he and his team are better than everyone else when they haven’t won a thing, there is still truth to the fact that Pavelski has been good.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions
He has
5 goals and 2 assists in 13 games. I think the goal in the second round you mention is IT, as far as the second round.
I like him as a player myself….but he is not THAT good this year.
He has been OK. He is not some superstar in the playoffs though, no matter what the Tan Man says!
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
Well Little Joe isn’t playing top 6 minutes and still has 7 points. I call that a win.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats fine.
I call him overrated. He had over 20 minutes in the last 5 versus Det. Thats big enough minutes.
Like I said, I think he is a great player. I just totally disagree with the idea that the guy is some superstar in the playoffs, or the “secret weapon”.
He is another good player on a deep team. Jannik Hansen has only 2 goals and an assist in his games, but averaged almost 5 minutes less.
I call that as much of a win as Pavs and his better numbers. Hansen played far less minutes then Joe. Joe was pretty close to top 6 minutes in the last series anyhow!
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
He had over 20 minutes in the last 5 versus Det. Thats big enough minutes.
Huh..I assumed wrong! :)
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions
They did go
With three lines for a bunch of that series, because of the close games.
Todd and AV seem cut from the same cloth huh?
Nuck’s Misconduct Bishop, 1st United Church of Luongod Mrs Waachcast speaks....Chuck Norris has a tattoo that says "Kesler". 5/9/11
Fucking Demitra.
Dogshit is more useful than that overrated fuckhead.
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
Fuck that guy
almost as useless as Clouts.
"I'll see you guys on the flippity flop" - Michael Scott
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).
by Chuckles Canuckles on May 15, 2011 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Demitra…URRRRRGHHHHHH my blood still boils. It boiled the day Gillis signed him!
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
I will admit he’s the one player on the Canucks of years past that I have the worst read on. For whatever reason I just don’t have a concrete opinion on him. Maybe I just caught mostly good games from him. I didn’t watch the Canucks as much last year and this year because I was at school. But when I watched I got the sense that he wasn’t great defensively, but that he did just add depth of skill. Maybe I’m overestimating his offensive skill and underestimating his pension for fing up defensively, but that’s the sense I got, just that if the Sedins didn’t get you, and Burrows didn’t get you, and even Kesler and Raymond didn’t get you, well then Wellwood-wood, or Demitra would, or Grabner would. I mean that’s the big difference now. Where you you have three guys who were pure offensive finesse guys last year (maybe with the exception of Wellwood who can play some defense too), now it’s different. You’re basically down three offensive forwards, a whole line of offensive forwards. Whether they were good defensively or not, that’s a whole line of offense that is just gone, and that’s what I’ve kind of been harkening on here. Even if that’s just your 4th line that plays 8 minutes, that’s 8 minutes more in a game where you have pure offensive skill on the ice, and it just adds to the offense. Maybe the tradeoff with that particular player, Demitra, on defense was not worth it, but the general concept is the point. Grabner, Pavelski, and Samuelsson gives you way more offensive depth than Hansen-Lapierre-Samuelsson (and now it’s not even Samuelsson do to injury, it’s Torres). And that’s a worry for Canuck fans. I mean it’s what everyone’s saying, Sharks have the better offensive depth, Canucks the better defensive depth. Well, if the Canucks had a 3rd line of Grabner-Pavelski-Samuelsson, it would be the Canucks with the better offensive depth and defensive depth. Obviously that’s way better. But hopefully the way it is will still be enough.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions
as this year, not and this year. I didnt watch them last year as much as this year because of school. I watched them a ton this year.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions
4-2 Nucks
Edler GWG. Another barnburner series begins. Hope my liver and throat are up to it.
I’m going to enjoy seeing Auntie being turned into Swiss cheese.
"This could be the year,this could be the moment
You've been waiting your whole life, to show the world the cards you're holding, It's One life, One dream, One spark, It's one chance, One move, One shot
It's on you, be cool....Believe"
And beyond that
Higgins, Hansen, Lapierre, Raymond, etc etc, these are all good players to varying degrees, but I think just the fact that they are all so fast, and a lot of them play with each other, that together they can become greater than the sum of their parts. Higgins may not be an elite player, but together with Raymond and Kesler, both of whom can fly, he can have a huge impact, because that line should be able to chase down most the lose pucks, and close most the gaps, and backcheck the opposion when they try to gain the zone. And on the flipside, they can gain the zone easier than normal because when backcheckers from San Jose try to close them and trap them at the blueline with the defenseman, many of their skaters won’t be able to catch these guys.
I think you saw about halfway through the season, San Jose started to rely more on defense and structure, and sort of trapping at soem points, to win games. I think their formation, and backchecking, and creating those traps for the opposition at their blueline, is a huge part of what’s made them a good team. And I believe Vancouver is best equipped to stop this portion of their game compared to any of the other teams, strictly because of their overabundance of speed.
So that’s the key for me. Clowe is a better player than Higgins or Raymond right now, but if whichever winger plays Clowe’s side can use their speed, they can create a tactical problem. They can match him just by breaking down SJ’s tactics. If Clowe is low in the ofefnsive zone, and Vancouver gets teh puck, and pushes it at full speed, Clowe can’t catch Higgins or Raymond on the backcheck. And against slower teams like LA and DET, SJ has really relied on being able to catch their forwards on the backcheck. If Vancouver plays smart tactically, and uses their speed, they can gain the blueline with regularity without a backchecker. Just lots of 1 on 1’s, 2 on 2’s, 3 on 3’s, with San Jose forwards caught deep. And with that type of space to get the blueline, that’s huge. That’s what will create a lot of goals. If Vancouver does that consistently, that’s how you win. I think Vancouver’s greatest strength is, if their forwards aren’t amazing passers, or just good, sizeable, top-end scorers like the Sedins, then they’re grade-A speedsters. I mean Raffi Torres in the top 9 aside, you basically have two elite All-stars, who you’re happy to have on the team, grade-A speed or not, because they’re elite all-stars, and then you have 6 grade A speedsters in Burrows, Raymond, Kesler, Higgins, Hansen, and Lapierre.
So that’s the strength for me. There aren’t a lot of Tanner Glass type players on this team who really have no elite skill to offer in any area. If someone isn’t the best body chcker, well then they have great speed to offer. If someone isn’t the faster (like Raffi Torres), he’s a good body checker and pest. Basically the whole top 9, even without Samuelsson, you don’t have a lot of bland players who just are kind of there, and they don’t offer anything. Everyone brings at least something to the tale, and a good chunk of players more than two. I still wish this team had something closer to Chicago’s 3rd line last year than what they have (and that they had another top-end forward on the 2nd line to go along wth Kesler, so that Higgins or Raymond could play on line 3), but they don’t. And what they do have, there are skills that can be used to break down SJ. I guess we’ll see how they fare. Also the defense HAS to get shots through and put up offense. Ehrhoff needs to start taking a shorter backswing again and start getting his shots on net again. He still has plenty of power to spare.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 6:52 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Very good points
Especially about speed. That is going to be key
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Ehrhoff needs to start taking a shorter backswing again and start getting his shots on net again.
I completely agree with this part. How many times have I heard Jim Robson over the last month say this: “Ehrhoff shoots! It’s wide of the net!” or some form of that.
by east_van_joe on May 15, 2011 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
I haven't heard Jim Robson call a game in a while
Pity.
But I have heard Jim Hughson say that a time or two.
And I agree about Erhoff.
by Tink for Nucks on May 15, 2011 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Freudian slip there. Jim Hughson, of course!
by east_van_joe on May 15, 2011 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
I said that because I watched the Sharks a lot a few years when they had Ehrhoff, and his last year under Ron Wilson, i mean the Sharks played a really defensive system that year, and Ehrhoff was kind of their stopper. But he wasn’t good at offense. In fact I didn’t even really see much offensively. He never hit the net. It was brutal. And I always thought like, for the people who think, well, the shot is so hard, that means there’s potential. He just has to start shooting it right into the top corners, and he’ll be great! For the people who thought that, I was like, if he could fricken shoot it accurately, he would. That’s like saying if Raffi Torres could just start passing like Henrik Sedin, he’d be a first line player. It’s like, obviously Ehrhoff has horrible aim.
But, anyway, then Mclellan and his staff came the next year, and they played a more offensive system for one, but secondly, Ehrhoff started not just hitting th enet, but really shooting with great accuracy. And their commentators, Remenda and Hahn, well they are huge homers, so they’re always trying to give the team and its coaches amazing credit for everything, and pour praise on them at every minute. So every shot ehrhoff hit the net with, they’d comment on how Yawney or some other assistant coach of the Sharks was responsible for that particular shot hitting the net, because they taught Ehrhoff to take a shorter backswing on his shot.
Now, they overblew that credit, because it wasn’t always a shorter backswing. Sometimes he took a long backswing but still shot it better, because he’d just gotten better in general. However, obviously there was also something to this, and he seems to have gotten away from this. He really does need to get back to it.
The problem with these things is obviously if he or the coaches noticed that he’s not hitting the net anymore, they would have remedied this already. Clearly they are oblivious to it. We know it, we know what he needs to do, but they dont, and we have no way of telling them, so its useless. There should really be some way for fans who notice things about their team and want to help to relay that information to the coaches, maybe through like someone who gets hired to read through the riff-raff and take out the good suggestions, or the ones that are made the most, and all that. As it currently is i mean, everyone here is pretty powerless to help their team, even in the simple matters like this that should be obvious to the team and coaches but arent. Unless someone here knows how to contact Ehrhoff or the coaches, im not sure what anyone can do.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
dude
you’re almost writing a fanpost here!
Nucks Misconduct writer, queen of inter-blogging etiquette.
I also ramble on Twitter every so often.
"Where there's Kesler, there's hope." - Tink for Nucks
I like this guy.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
i’m just noticing how much he has to say.
Nucks Misconduct writer, queen of inter-blogging etiquette.
I also ramble on Twitter every so often.
"Where there's Kesler, there's hope." - Tink for Nucks
Have you seen his fan post? Impressive.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions
thanks man!
i dont want to seem lame like i spend all day on here writing these things. i mean they take thought and effort but i am also a fast typist and all that. but regardless when you do put time into a long post its nice to hear (someone actually read it, for one, lol, and) that someone liked it.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions
and yeah
i dont really know anyone on here or have any small talk going on where i’d be writing multiple shorter posts. i sort of just read the preview here and it inspired some thoughts about the series so i decided to post them, and they jsut ended up being long.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Make them as long as you want. There’s no word limit here :)
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks man
But yeah I’ve posted my thoughts here, probably once more than was necessarily (but that all comes when you’re responding to people and all that), so they’re here for people to read them and take what they will. Im going to leave and let people post theirs. I might come back for the game thread later. It was good chatting hockey guys, Sean. It’s gonna be a long 1:30 until the game.
by jacktheboxboss on May 15, 2011 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions
5-3 Canucks...
Higgins with the winner (why mess up a good thing?) and one of Burrows/Kesler for the empy-netter.
Oh, and I just wanted everyone to know that if San Jose’s goalie had balls he’d be Uncle Niemi. That’s all.
I can’t wait for the game to start!
Let's Go Nucks
Been waiting forever it seems for this game to start!!
2—3 Nucks
MayRay GWG
The Pittsburgh Penguins are better then you.
The Vancouver Canucks are better then you.
The team with the most HEART will hoist the Cup in June.
Follow me on Twitter as PensFanInDenver
by PensFanInDenver on May 15, 2011 7:32 AM PDT reply actions
5-3Canucks, Dank
cannot stop the battery! Cuz it’s an energizer?
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
The Weakest Link
I know that we Canucks fans are passionate about and committed to our team. I desperately hope that we are able to keep some perspective in this series. Let’s all agree at the outset that this is not going to be a swept series. There are going to be mistakes made and games lost. Let us agree that we will not declare ourselves the invincible Champions when we win a game. Let us all agree also, that we won’t descend into negativity and finger pointing at the first whiff of adversity. Let us remember that the series is not won or lost until one of the contestants wins a fourth victory. Let us agree that that team will be the Canucks. Stay the course fellow fans. Keep calm and stay supportive. Of each other that is. The players have other things on their minds and probably don’t hear a word we say so great is their focus. The Canucks in six.
Pretty sure
This is the first time two PST teams have played in the WCF. In fact, I am sure
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
I’m thrilled for it. Means no rushing home or anything. :)
GO SHARKS!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin (see profile for more info on this quote)
Except they all start at 5 or 6PM ;) Perfect times for me though – 8 and 9
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Yeah I don’t approve of them moving the time up, but not much we can do there. Stupid NHL.
GO SHARKS!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin (see profile for more info on this quote)
to be fair
they changed the eastern games to start at 8 local time too.
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions
The first period should be interesting
I wonder how the Canucks will come out after the long lay-off. I’m not sure this is a team that does better on too much rest.
Gotta say
I’m a bit worried about today’s game…cuz it’s raining. Of the 13 games we’ve played so far in the playoffs, we’ve lost 5 of em. All 5 games we lost were on days it rained at my house. The 8 we won: no rain, although it threatened a couple times. Yup…bad omen. So two hopes here:
1: It stops raining before 5
2: It’s a small sample size, plus omens really don’t mean shit. Of course, I still haven’t worn my jersey for a win since that horrible NM meetup game against Chicago, way back in November. But I ain’t superstitious, as the Jeff Beck band once said.
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
When
is it not raining in Vancouver? :P
"I'll see you guys on the flippity flop" - Michael Scott
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).
by Chuckles Canuckles on May 15, 2011 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
May, usually
:(
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
by Twitchy2010 on May 15, 2011 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
I know :(
It was sunny when I drove to work yesterday morning, and then it was pouring when I was driving home.
"I'll see you guys on the flippity flop" - Michael Scott
Nucks Misconduct's official black guy and first line center (Twitter's 1st line center also).
by Chuckles Canuckles on May 15, 2011 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Twitchy, you convinced me :) Not really.
I’m just gonna use you as an excuse for being a numbskull.
4-3 Sharks
Marleau
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:33 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I will be responsible no one's
proxy numbskullery! Take that back!
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
by Twitchy2010 on May 15, 2011 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
^for
stupid english…
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
by Twitchy2010 on May 15, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Sure! Blame the proxy!
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions
I flagged this. Take your hallucinations elsewhere, Sean.
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
If I rec it, will it cancel out your flag? ;)
GO SHARKS!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin (see profile for more info on this quote)
Get away from my flag!
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
reflagged
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
by Twitchy2010 on May 15, 2011 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Funny, cuz I get to see what is flagged in the Editorial Dashboard. haha, the prediction stands! Thanks Twitchy!
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions
And by the way, I am predicting that the teams split the first 2 in Van. Shoot me.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Bang
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
"You can't come in my kitchen, kick my dog, and take a box full of ballpoints! Your ass must be crazy!"
Shoot him again
Not sure he’s dead yet:)
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
Well you guys, today is the big day. Stomach is in knots again, I have no more nails to chew from the last series the Sharks were in. And for my sanity, once puck drops, I’ll be disappearing from this site (maybe). Cause we all know how irrationally passionate we all get about our teams. :)
I wish for a great series between our teams. With refs making only good calls. And when it’s all said and done, may our then fragile friendship still be there. :)
GO SHARKS!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin (see profile for more info on this quote)
Cheers
Here’s to a great series!
Rogers Arena - the Sugarbowl!
by Big Blue Whale on May 15, 2011 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions
4-3 Nucks
AMFB FTW!
Need to weather the first period in this one. Lou will need to be sharp. We do that we have a great chance.
Really need these home games. Shark Tank is going to be nuts and hard to steal one there.
Win it for Manny!
Nucks Misconduct's chief slab of man meat and resident doucherocket.
4-3 Canucks
3rd line is the key to the game. Not for scoring but to make sure that the line they play against doesn’t score. Torres is going to have play smart but start hitting again.
The defense will have to step up and get their shots on net……therefore…..
Bieksa GWG.
Bieksa reminds me of Han Solo, except without the charm...or the Wookie at his side, unless you count Alberts.
Man
I just wish AV would put together a 4th line of Tambo-Hodgson-Oreskovich already. Speed, speed and then some more speed.
Not that Glass isn’t speedy when he’s on his game, but he hasn’t been on his game for almost a month now. I just don’t recall him doing anything at all in these playoffs. Honestly though, what has he been doing out there?
Rogers Arena - the Sugarbowl!
It’s tough for any of those guys to do anything in 5 minutes.
by Canuckelhead on May 15, 2011 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I am not on board with Glass anymore either. But he is a second faceoff option I suppose.
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh I know
I just don’t know why AV wouldn’t roll his lines a bit more against the Preds though since they didn’t really any single standout gamebreakers. Glass has been ineffective so far these playoffs.
Rogers Arena - the Sugarbowl!
by Big Blue Whale on May 15, 2011 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions
3-1 Canucks, Hansen
"We've made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our space, and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds, and we fall back. Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far, no further! And I will make them pay for what they've done!" - Captain Jean-Luc Picard
I’m toast in the predicting contests, so I’ll say…4-3 Canucks in this game (Dank), but the Sharks’ll win in 7.
You had better duck..
Nucks Misconduct Contributor
Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead, and we can't get Jon Bon Jovi onto a f*cking helicopter?! -Denis Leary
by Sean Zandberg on May 15, 2011 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions
3-1 Nucks
Hank ftw
"It's a great day for an exorcism!" - Shorty, 4/26/11, after Game 7 OT winner by Burrows in round one of the SC Playoffs against the Hawks
by nucklord on May 15, 2011 4:43 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Canucks 4-2
RAYMOND = gwg
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.'

by 



















