Hawks 5 Canucks 1. Game Over
Ack! Game 6 started off as a classic in the first period with Roberto Luongo playing the hero role, with the Canucks being outshot 13-12 but the game still being scoreless..... But when Dustin Byfuglien smacked Alexander Edler late in the first and took him out of the game, you know that trouble would ensue, especially with Sami Salo playing with a bruised nut. How much more injuries could our defence endure?
Well, that was not the case so much in the end, as Chicago unloaded 2 straight goals at the 2:00 and 2:36 marks of the 2nd period. Both goals were huge defensive breakdowns by Vancouver, which we had seen countless times in the series. Hell, the Canucks did not score their first goal of the game until the 3:44 mark of the 3rd period (Shane O'Brien). They could not get any quality chances (or..refused to shoot the damned puck). By then it was too late. Patrick Kane scored 5 minutes later to make it 4-1 and that rat bastard Byfugly scored 25 seconds later to make it 5-1.
What a fucked up series. When either team let up they got smoked in this series. Tonight was the Canucks' turn.
Much to talk about in regards to these Canucks, but I/we will save it until later.
57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1. Penguins
2. Sharks
Other than that noone else I really want to see win. I just hope at least one of those teams makes the SCF so I can cheer them on
Please Pens win tomorrow, don’t think I can cope both my teams going out in two days
Rec’d like the Canucks’ defense.
But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.
by Steckel Me Elmo on May 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions
For the record, I chose Sharks.
But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.
by Steckel Me Elmo on May 12, 2010 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions
so did i.
i haven’t chosen out of the east yet, but it will definitely be anyone but the pens.
Nucks Misconduct contributor.
Also on Twitter.
It Appears
Pens fans aren’t highly regarded around here, so I’ll keep my thoughts brief. This was a successful season, Canucks, but the Hawks were better. That’s how playoffs work. Screw the BCS above all else!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on May 12, 2010 12:23 AM PDT reply actions
I’m pretty sure the sights were set on at least WCF or bust, so I wouldn’t exactly call the season a success. Also, what’s your beef with the BCS (you being a UT fan and all)?
by Optical Delusion on May 12, 2010 1:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Because
like most of us who have either served LDS missions in Texas or live in Texas, we advocate fair play above all else. I’d be shocked if more than 1-millionth of Texans like the BCS. Give me a playoff in college football.
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on May 12, 2010 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I read in the other thread that we should be proud because we're the underdog
Sorry, but underdogs have made a habit of winning their playoff series and we had home-ice last year and still lost. This year we sucked again at home and lost in the exact same way, by completely collapsing down the stretch.
This post-season was a FAIL.
"It's fourth and fifteen and you're looking at a full-court press." - Lt. Frank Drebin, Police Squad
Yep, I don’t t think you can call it a success when you win 2 out of 6 games at home…and go 0/3 at home in round 2.
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
I had no expectations, and thus cannot be disappointed.
at least that is what I keep telling myself.
Go Habs.
"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan
by Chuckles Canuckles on May 12, 2010 1:00 AM PDT reply actions
Handshake
Hey guys, once again it was a fun series and the back and forth w/ NM was great. I always like when our 2 teams play because of the great stuff you guys put up on NM.
Here’s to see you next year again!
September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.
Hawks?
How can the Hawks be leading this poll? Ugh. I wish there was an “Anyone but the Hawks” option.
Go Habs! Go Bruins! Go Sharks! (and if I have to, I suppose “Go Flyers and Pens!”)
You're dealing with Chicago
We can rig any election we want.
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene."
by cdz3210 on May 12, 2010 7:03 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well played!
Great line!
As usual, my neutral tendencies are kicking in: Root for teams that haven’t won it before or haven’t won in a while. Sharks, then Chicago — I’d rather see either of those teams beat anyone from the East. And that includes Montreal. Not a hater of Crosby or the Penguins, but they’ve already won a Cup just now. The way Boston and Philly are banging each other up, they’re going to be playing their ECHL teams if they make it to the finals. I can appreciate Montreal’s storybook run, but, c’mon, this is Montreal.
So, go Sharks!
My guess
Is that Chicago fans from SCH have been coming over here to get our take on the loss and voting.
I’m Hab’s then maybe the Sharks.
Not me!
I wouldn’t want to skew a poll that is obviously meant for Nucks fans only. Unfortunately I can’t speak for other SCH peoples’ behavior (cdz3210, I’m looking at you). Maybe you know this already, but if you go to a person’s profile, you can see how they voted.
If the tables had been turned and the Canucks knocked the Blackhawks out, I would be cheering for you guys to knock the shit out of SJ.
me either
the poll is for Canucks fans. But i was pretty surprised to see the results myself.
And to reiterate, it’s been fun reading the content you guys put up on this site, you have a lot of classy commenters. I’ve had a ton of fun over here during this series, so thanks for that. And I’m SURE we’ll be seeing you all again next year.
by puppetmasterp on May 12, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
I hope not
I am hoping you guys flame out in the first round next year so we don’t have to worry about the Hawks.
"We love them, We mourn for them, Unlucky boys of Red" - Morrissey
"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"He's got a man deep..wait, no that IS Mandeep!!" - Don Taylor
by Section 312 on May 12, 2010 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Most people I talk in my hometown are pulling for the Habs or Hawks. Nobody likes Thornton. Nor do I
by Sean Zandberg on May 12, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Good show
You folks are a classy bunch and it’s been great to understand your perspective throughout the series. As much as we are fans of our respective clubs, we’re all hockey fans in the end. If the shoe was on the other foot, I’d pull for whatever Western Conference club that made it to the final.
Montreal or Boston
Can’t see either winning the holy grail though unfortunately. Disappointing way to go out. Already hating to hear “Well, there’s always next year”. I’m sick of next year.
by sunshine and lollipops on May 12, 2010 8:18 AM PDT reply actions
Who do I want to win?
Once the Canucks are out I have a fairly simple criteria. Which team’s fans would appreciate it more…but you’re disqualified if your team has won the cup ’recently
(I reserve the right to define ‘recent’ any way I want, and change my mind on a whim).
That’s why I eventually went with the Oilers on their run, and the Flames on theirs over the Hurricanes and Lightning.
Fortunately this season we now have lots of options.
Obviously I don’t want the Pens to win, but after that we have:
Montreal: No cup since ’93.
Boston: No cup since ’72
Philly: No cup since ’75
Chicago: No cup since ’61! And I think only one final since then too?
San Jose: No cup ever, been in the league since ’91.
So for any of those teams you could be entering college and never have seen your team win the Cup (or for most of them, make the finals), and to boot, four of those are major hockey towns.
So my pick (holding nose) is Chicago. We have a lot more in common with their fans than anyone would like to admit.
I think it should be based on which fans would be the most fun to watch if their team wins.
Montreal, hands down.

and

Please post legible comics.
"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan
by Chuckles Canuckles on May 12, 2010 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions
It’d be interesting to see the Habs’ Halak steal some more games. Sort of makes up Luongo’s inability to do so.
c'mon now
you can’t seriously pin the losses squarely on Luongo.
I will be the first to admit that this year has been wildly inconsistent for the Captain. However, given the breakdowns that occurred throughout this series on defense and on the PP, this was a series team loss.
Montreal is not extending the series against Pittsburgh and did not win the series against Washington solely on Halak’s performance. Watch the games. The team bought in and consistently has been there to block shots and clear second and third chance rebounds.
In the games that Vancouver won against Chicago, the team did just that. In their losses, they hung Luongo out to dry with multiple breakaway and odd-man rush attempts.
I know that losing stings, but give your freaking head a shake, man.
True
He was in the zone in Game 2 and we should have taken it and the rest of the team just took their feet off the gas pedal.
by sunshine and lollipops on May 12, 2010 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions
agreed
last year luongo gave up a two goal lead. this year in game 6 i saw a few 2 on 1s some breakaways and although he gave up some softies they shouldnt have happened in the first place
Lou saved our asses in the first period last night. Then his mates absolutely shit the bed in front of him. How many breakaways and 2 on 1’s? Man oh man. But hey Gillis wants more offence, but now the defence is shit. I’ve said all along I prefer the tighter D. A more structured system. Look at how the Hawks defend their leads. Look at how Niemi, who is a good not a great goalie, gets an easier ride in this series because his guys play like a team in front of him.
Are you not entertained??? Fuck. That was entertaining alright, but it is not successful.
by Sean Zandberg on May 12, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions
In the east it’s Philly for me. Ever since the Broad Street Bullies and the short but incredible career of Pelle Lindbergh, I’ve always liked them. Tried to bear with them through the Lindros years and have always thought of them as that “touched” cousin since Bobby Clarke took the helm.
Out west, I really wish Detroit was still in now. My decission here would be so much easier (whover is playing Detroit). That being said, I am indifferent right now. But with the large BC contingent and Mr. Toews at the helm, it might eventually turn into Chicago. It’s still just too early.
Shove it in your addendum.
I voted for the hawks…cuz much as they’ve got some real doucherockets, they’ve also got some kick ass players who I think will have fantastic and long careers. All of em from Canada.
"I carry gas...smoke...and also wear a helmet." Major Douche, USMC
"you'll be playing in england the rest of your career" Alex Burrows
"Aint no party like my nana's tea party...hey...hoe..."
You know, that pic looks like Luongo is berating Byfuglien, and buff looks real sheepish about it. All we need is the finger in the face “you know, sonny, it’s not very respectful to hit me on the head with your stick three hundred times” “I know sir. I’m very sorry. Heat of the moment, and I probably need to do some growing.”
"I carry gas...smoke...and also wear a helmet." Major Douche, USMC
"you'll be playing in england the rest of your career" Alex Burrows
"Aint no party like my nana's tea party...hey...hoe..."
I find that poll disturbing
Although I use to like the Hawks a bit and I would cheer for them, I’m wondering now if I am the only one who despises the Hawks purely based on how often I had to see Byfuglien’s face. And that really is the only reason, and maybe a bit of Burrish too.
And I don’t mean by the way they play, I actually mean I hate the sight of their face. Go B’s Go!
I chose an option I don’t agree with but it was the closest to my choice. I chose I don’t watch now that the Canucks are out. I will still watch, but couldn’t give a squirt who wins. Won’t pick a side either way. Hopefully it’s good hockey. Still hoping Malkin gets his head dislocated in the last couple minutes here…
Nucks Misconduct's Grumpy Old Man
WAACH Blog/Podcast- The 38th best Canucks blog on the Interwebs
He’s not playing anymore hockey this year, if that’s any consolation.
Please allow me to adjust my pants, so that I may dance the good time dance, and lead the onlookers and innocent bystanders into a trance.
it’s fine, but not the karmic retribution I was looking for.
Nucks Misconduct's Grumpy Old Man
WAACH Blog/Podcast- The 38th best Canucks blog on the Interwebs

by 
















