Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Monday Morning Coffee- Nut...I mean Gutcheck Time

CHICAGO - MAY 09: Daniel Sedin #22 of the Vancouver Canucks has his legs buckle before he hits the ice as Dave Bolland #36 of the Chicago Blackhawks hooks him after the chickenshit slash to the ankle in Game Five of the Western Conference Semifinals during the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at United Center on May 9, 2010 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)


I don't think there's anyone out there who isn't somewhat relieved to hear that Sami Salo didn't suffer a ruptured testicle last night.  Well, everyone except this dude.  So now that we've collectively uncrossed our legs, let's talk about that game last night.  I am sure some of you are eager to walk around and boast that you knew they were going to win, and it was never in doubt.  You're missing the point of last night's win if you are, and unless they continue this effort tomorrow it's all for naught.  I think there's a lot of that going on right now.  Instead of being happy, people are saying things like 'why didn't Bieksa do this all series?' etc.  That doesn't matter.  It happened when we needed it.  And this win doesn't mean we're out of danger.  More after the jump

Star-divide

I know this series, hell... this season has been full of frustrating moments from various players, but in the end all that matters is they showed up in a big way when it counted.  Look back if you want, but all that really matters is right now.  A game played in November has zero relevance.  They're still trailing in this series, and if they don't show up with the same workman like attitude at GM Place for game 6, this series is over.  It's amazing though, how much these games show that when one of the teams are determined to play their game, the other team just gets neutralized.  Much like game 1, Roberto Luongo had things shut down, and even more than game 1, the Canucks slowed things down and dictated the pace of the play all night long.

You could even say it was at times a trap game.  Go ahead and complain.  If that's what it takes to get back into this series and possibly win it, then Viva Lemaire, motherfuckers!  It's funny, I want to be louder and prouder about the effort of the Canucks last night, but knowing they're still down in the series I know better.  It was still impressive though, as guys like Kevin Bieksa, Christian Ehrhoff and Shane O'Brien stepped up on D, and Kyle Wellwood and Alexandre Burrows leading the way up front.

The redemption of Kyle Wellwood is quietly becoming one of the feelgood stories of the playoffs.  An internet legend thanks to his eating habits and a desire from some to never let anyone forget it, if this series swings back to the Canucks, and they pull off the comeback, it will be in large part to the tenacity of Kyle Wellwood.  3rd in playoff faceoff wins, his shifts have been pure effort, whether mucking and grinding to create scoring opportunities, going to the net and getting open in the face of much larger defensive opponents, or breaking up rushes time after time with his tireless backchecking, Welly has been the unsung hero of this series for sure.

An early goal from Ehrhoff took the crowd out of the game and apart from the 3rd period goal from Toews, they never got into it.  One thing I was surprised at was the lack of composure from the Hawks, and when you look at the stuff they did that wasn't called, they should be feeling pretty damn lucky it was another 'stellar' night from an officiating standpoint.  From Bolland's slash to the ankle of Daniel Sedin, to Tomas Kopecky's crosscheck on Roberto Luongo as he lay on the ice (and you're all pathetic hypocrites if you spewed outrage about Alex Burrows crosschecking Dustin Byfuglien in the shoulder blades the previous game but were okay with Kopecky doing this) to the piece de resistance: Joel Quennville sending mouth breather Ben Eager onto the ice in the last 30 seconds.  The scumbag made a beeline for Christian Ehrhoff and delivered a very deliberate 2 hand chop to Ehrhoff's wrists that the NHL seriously needs to take a loo... oh who are we kidding, he could have cut his fucking arms off and the league would do nothing about it.  Oh, and let us not forget the moment where Ryan Kesler was vindicated, as we saw just how much of a fucking coward Andrew Ladd was by deliberately reopening the wound on O'Brien's face.

The Canucks played their game and didn't buy into the bush league garbage of the Hawks and came out with the victory.  They didn't play a perfect game, but came pretty damn close.  As far as road games go, that one may have been their best one all season.  Potentially losing Salo is going to make things even more difficult in game 6, but as long as the Canucks play tight, sound defensive hockey and continue the very effective dump and chase on the less mobile members of the Chicago defense, we should be confident that the Canucks will be heading back Chicago for game 7 on Thursday.

So breathe a little bit, Canuckleheads.  A major battle won, but the war still rages.  Enjoy the win, but the time to celebrate has yet to arrive.  It's okay to chuckle a bit at those who predicted our demise would be the ugliest of them all, my personal favorite is our dear friend and hockey's resident bitchy, bitter old man Stan Fischler, who posted this earlier this morning.  It kind of makes this post so much sweeter.  And let's not forget this and this.  Jerk.

Bottom line is, despite facing elimination the pressure in this series is shifting back to the Blackhawks.  They were supposed to close out against a team that was wavering on the ropes.  They let us back into this, and are now facing real adversity for the first time this playoff year.  They have a rookie goalie who couldn't seal the deal, and a group of players whose focus last night seemed to be more about inflicting physical harm then trying to win the game.  This Hawks team may be the ones who can't handle the pressure.  A long road still, but this team showed there is still fight left, and if the Hawks want this series, they're going to have to earn it.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I haven’t even read this yet, but I saw the headline nearly spat out my coffee. Hilarious.

(Gingerly cups groin area to check that everything is still intact down there)

Contributor to Nucks Misconduct
Blog: 'Nucks and Pucks
Twitter: @nucksandpucks

by nucksandpucks on May 10, 2010 7:30 AM PDT reply actions  

I would like to strum up my Nostradamus-like pregame post:

Forgive me Salo, I hope you go on to bear many more children

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on May 10, 2010 7:35 AM PDT reply actions  

lol rec'd that one.

"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan

by Chuckles Canuckles on May 10, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

And now I have read it. Well said. I am really more relieved than anything at the victory. Gonna need another huge, disciplined effort tomorrow.

Contributor to Nucks Misconduct
Blog: 'Nucks and Pucks
Twitter: @nucksandpucks

by nucksandpucks on May 10, 2010 7:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I think overall I like what I am hearing from the majority of Canucks fans, not a lot of hooting and hollering, just relief, and pride at a damn fine game from the team. We all know this isn’t over and they need to do this two more times. They control their own destiny.

Nucks Misconduct's Grumpy Old Man
WAACH Blog/Podcast- The 38th best Canucks blog on the Interwebs

by Kent Basky on May 10, 2010 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Official Petition?

Anyone else want to start an official petition to the NHL to have Game 6 played in Chicago?

I’m just saying…

Knights, Canucks, Dolphins, Jays and Raptors all the way.

by Jevant on May 10, 2010 7:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah what’s up with that? Lu has played night and day better in the UC in this series. Maybe the team should get all the fans on Tuesday some muzzles, and play Chelsea Dagger before the game…

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on May 10, 2010 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Something about road games

Almost every team has had better success on the road during this playoff.

by seedvt on May 10, 2010 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Let’s hope that stops being the case tomorrow, but then becomes the case again for game 7…

"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"

by Semi_Colon on May 10, 2010 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

If the ’Nucks lose 3 in a row on home ice, they probably deserve their fate.

Please allow me to adjust my pants, so that I may dance the good time dance, and lead the onlookers and innocent bystanders into a trance.

by Smoboy41 on May 10, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I have felt all along that the Canucks at their best can beat the Hawks at their best, but as you said, they need to want it this badly 10 more times. If they play like they did any of the previous 3 games to this, their season is done. I do believe if this series goes seven (which i’m almost positive it will now) the winner of it will continue on with a most outstanding post season (ahem), and as mentioned in the infamous poll post, I still have my pick to do so.

"Hope you like pancakes, Norway..." Morgan Freeman
"you'll be playing in england the rest of your career" Alex Burrows
"Aint no party like my nana's tea party...hey...hoe..."

by GAHHHHH! on May 10, 2010 7:40 AM PDT reply actions  

"Officiating"

Your club played a pretty close to flawless road game to avoid elimination, and congratulations are in order. But I wish fans on both sides of this series would avoid complaining about poor officiating.

The refs called a pretty tight game; I think the tightest of this entire series. You can point to missed calls and the like and wonder if the game would have headed into a different direction, but the bottom line is that your team came out on top. And, I think it’s finally fair to say that we’re about even on the blown calls and/or “even out” calls.

We’ve yet to see a game where both of these teams actually settle down and play their systems. I think game six will be one for the highlight reels, and I hope the road game victory trend holds up.

by MickDurand on May 10, 2010 8:40 AM PDT reply actions  

I disagree, and it’s not because calls go one way or another. It’s all the series, and it’s all about consistency. In this time of year we deserve to see better officiating than the call against Burrows in the first where Seabrook (I believe it was) tripped on his own, or the missed call on the slash on Daniel. The officiating in all series has almost uniformly shown these officials have had no feel for the flow of each individual game, and have made choices to call or not call that seem bizarre to even the most casual of observers…

Nucks Misconduct's Grumpy Old Man
WAACH Blog/Podcast- The 38th best Canucks blog on the Interwebs

by Kent Basky on May 10, 2010 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can appreciate that. For instance, the Luongo trip on Byfuglien and the Niemi hooking call are two separate calls that I think clearly demonstrate inconsistency in the officiating. If Luongo gets called for tripping right there, that game may have been over even sooner. And, if the ref looks the other way on a hook that was altogether inadvertent, we might grab some momentum and make something happen.

The point being, bad officiating, at least in this series, has been an equitable phenomenon. Both teams have been adversely impacted by blown or missed calls, and at times have enjoyed undeserved power plays that have changed the outcome of games and, ultimately, the series.

But you’re right about the bourgeois officiating. It’s mind boggling how some of these refs carry themselves. And with four officials on the ice, it seems the bad calls have increased in quantity and the calls that need to be made somehow always escape the eyes of whatever crew working the rink. It’s frustrating, but it impacts each team, so the most we can hope for is a continued (somewhat) equal distribution of the bad/non calls.

by MickDurand on May 10, 2010 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree.

Reffing has been terrible on both sides. I could pick out shit that was supposed to be Vancouver or Chicago penalties throughout the game.

"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan

by Chuckles Canuckles on May 10, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very ballsy performance from the Canucks last night

We definitely grew a pair and took the game to the Blackhawks. Things got a little testy after the SOB injury but we survived. Bieksa played great but Alberts’ lazy pass into the Blackhawks slot was just nuts. I don’t know what it is about Chicago that makes Luongo good, because he stones everyone there but not in Vancouver.

Game 6, home ice, I’m feeling confident about Tuesday. Oh wait, we haven’t won a game at home in this series?

Balls.

"It's fourth and fifteen and you're looking at a full-court press." - Lt. Frank Drebin, Police Squad

by SSreporters on May 10, 2010 8:50 AM PDT reply actions  

i think the memories of last year make luongo stronger in that building……

by missy on May 10, 2010 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lu needs to conjure up Olympic memories so he can get his shit together at GM Place.

Please allow me to adjust my pants, so that I may dance the good time dance, and lead the onlookers and innocent bystanders into a trance.

by Smoboy41 on May 10, 2010 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

That rules pretty hard!

by trotski on May 10, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ha ha! Yes!

Canucks fans talking about the Canucks: Pass it To Bulis!

by skeeter_dan on May 10, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol juice!

"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan

by Chuckles Canuckles on May 10, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can never figure out this team. It disappoints you to the extreme, and when you are ready to give up on them, they laugh in your face with a win.
It’s only one game, but at least we got our dignity back. That’s a good start. The problem is that it is almost impossible to play a road-type-game on home ice, but the Canucks will have to do just that, to guarantee a game seven. At home, they tend to relax and get emotional, and if they play like that, it will be over, in front of a stunned crowd. So, they will have to show a supernatural self-control, combined with a quiet but deadly determination. Not the flashy type.

What’s up with Bieksa? After every Canucks fan on this forum finally agreed that he is more of a liability than anything else, he confuses us with an incredible performance. May be his instinct told him that last night could have been his last game in a Canucks uniform, and he decided to win a game for the boys. Isn’t that a strange coincidence? Now what?

I am somewhat confused about the O’Brien high stick between the eyes (thank God it wasn’t the eyes). Whas the non-call a good one, since it was deemed to be a “follow-through”? What’s a follow-through anyway, if you can take someone’s head off with it?
It seemed like the subsequent call on Byfuglien was just to make up for the guilt the official felt because of the non-call.

Los Angeles, CA

by AttilaS on May 10, 2010 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

A follow through means you can take someone’s eye out. See Bryan Berard

by Sean Zandberg on May 10, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

no penalty on that, either

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on May 10, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

and that’s why I believe they should penalize it anyways. there has to be a way to control the follow through at least some of the time

interesting thing… it was Hossa that injured Berard

Nucks Misconduct's Grumpy Old Man
WAACH Blog/Podcast- The 38th best Canucks blog on the Interwebs

by Kent Basky on May 10, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, yes ir remember Berard. I think he attempted a come-back, lasted a few games, but couldn’t do it.

Los Angeles, CA

by AttilaS on May 10, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not to split hairs

But Berard’s comeback was a little more then a few games. He won the Bill Masterson trophy. Granted his promising career was never the same but it’s not like only played one or two games

by Canuckelhead on May 10, 2010 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

…it was Hossa that injured Berard

Man, I don’t know why Hossa seems so repulsive to me. I could never like that guy, ever since I saw him switching teams every year, in his hot pursuit of the cup. Now I know why my instinct worked that way.

Los Angeles, CA

by AttilaS on May 10, 2010 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hossa is a mercenary.

"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan

by Chuckles Canuckles on May 10, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nothing wrong with that when your career is as short as a hockey player’s is. It means you should respect those that stay, and the ‘loyalty’ more, not the mercenary less.

When he plays well he’s pretty amazing, I prefer it when he doesn’t as it gives us a better chance.

by rsm on May 10, 2010 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

i think that has a bit of an unfair connotation to it

sure he’s been jumping from team to team, but its not like he’s just looking for the biggest pay day (i.e., taking a huge offer from a team like toronto or something). he’s going to team’s that have a legit chance to win the cup. i would think that a desire to win the cup at least indicates this guy gives a damn. anyway he’s locked up to a pretty long contract, not much of a mercenary anymore. of course, he’s still getting paid quite handsomely in the process.

Doesn’t seem very moral to me. Might as well take Satan’s autograph while you’re at it. - N.C.

by Illini0509 on May 10, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

penalize for follow-through high sticks? Nah I don’t think so.

by Sean Zandberg on May 10, 2010 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn’t think much of him before, but I met him and a bunch of the Slovak team during the Olympics and he was probably the nicest and most polite of the bunch. Pretty classy guy and nice enough to give me a signed picture b/c he was impressed I recognized all the guys. But no, he was no carrying pictures of himself – some guy had a stack and wanted them signed so he signed one for him if he would agree to give me another. And he dds no have to do that at all, it was a really nice gesture.

by sunshine and lollipops on May 10, 2010 11:13 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ack…

Sorry for the spelling. Typing on my phone!

by sunshine and lollipops on May 10, 2010 11:15 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Cool story, thanks for sharing.

by rsm on May 11, 2010 4:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Out-coached

Quenneville lost his cool last night when he sent Eager out for the final minute. Frustration from the top down. Check these numbers:

  A. Burish 05:52
  B. Eager 06:49
  J. Hendry 05:12

So much for icing a winning formula. Salo logged more time in one period.

I’m curious to see how Chicago responds on Tuesday, now that Vancouver has beaten them at their A game (Game 1), and figured out their goon game (okay, so it took 4 games to figure it out, lol).

by sirrated on May 10, 2010 10:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, the Canucks finally showed the other cheek last night. Incredible, but it worked.

Los Angeles, CA

by AttilaS on May 10, 2010 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Salo had showed the other cheek, he might have avoided a trip to the hospital…

by splnwezel on May 10, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Note to self: when facing a shot, turn body ever slightly sideways, to show cheek. Your tenders will be thankful for it.

Los Angeles, CA

by AttilaS on May 10, 2010 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately, they’ll probably put actual hockey players on the ice next game.

by rsm on May 10, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

1 win down

2 to go…Go Nucks please take out the Hawks and then the Sharks and then the Pens…Thanks

TULO = 2010 MVP!

Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."

LETS GO WINGS!

by TuLoRocks2008 on May 10, 2010 1:42 PM PDT reply actions  

as we saw just how much of a fucking coward Andrew Ladd was by deliberately reopening the wound on O’Brien’s face.

So, here’s a question: if you’re playing a competative game of hockey, you wouldn’t do this? My husband is a pretty clean player but admitted that he’d probably have a hard time resisting the urge to pull a cheap shot like that…

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on May 10, 2010 2:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I wouldn't

I think it’s bush league, but as above, unless it’s going to be determined “intent to injure” (which I don’t think it should be), I can’t see anything specifically wrong with it.

I don’t think facewashing like that has any place in hockey period, but under the current rules and the way they are interpreted, I don’t think there’s any penalty.

Knights, Canucks, Dolphins, Jays and Raptors all the way.

by Jevant on May 10, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah, I’d say the facewashing debate is separate, but if you allow facewashing, this isn’t really a dirty thing to do, and I think that most people who are OK with facewashing should be OK with this.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on May 10, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't think it was dirty

just a guy taking advantage of another guy being hurt. I wouldn’t respect teams if they didn’t try to exploit things like that. It would show me they weren’t really trying. Just like going after Campbell and trying to hit him and re-injure his shoulder. Your opponent has a weakness you exploit it.

"We love them, We mourn for them, Unlucky boys of Red" - Morrissey
"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"He's got a man deep..wait, no that IS Mandeep!!" - Don Taylor

by Section 312 on May 10, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um yeah… that’s such a moronic comment.

You have a weakness. I exploit it: I’m only going to roll three lines anyways, so I have my 4th line go out there and lay the lumber over the wrists and ankles of the opponents top line. What the hell, spear them in the nuts every time the ref looks the other way. I just exploited the weakness that you only have 3 1st line players, and I have an AHL team full of goons. Discuss.

So, play hard, exploit weakness, if it happens in the order of normal play, and a player dressed is to play who was injured and is not 100% ready to return (see: Oilers, Edmonton – among the issues that led a lot of staff to be let go recently) sure, I can see that. Making sure you finish your checks on the guy with a sore shoulder, weak leg or whatever. That is in the normal course of the game.

However your hands have nothing to do in some guy’s face through the normal course of the game, your lumber has no place on some guy’s ankle or wrist through the normal course of the game. It’s a dick move, and has nothing to do with exploiting a weakness or playing hard. It proves nothing other than your are a weak scrote who can’t play the game.

by rsm on May 10, 2010 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah well I guess I am a moron then

The face wash thing wasn’t dirty. If SOB doesn’t want to get his stitches ripped open don’t go stick your face in a big scrum and start pushing and shoving. Otherwise you are fair game. If Campbell is hurt and playing through pain let’s make sure he plays through as much pain as possible. That’s hockey. If it makes your vagina sore go watch a different sport. Is that moronic enough for you?

I didn’t say anything about lumber in this thread so not sure why you brought that up. But I will say this. Sack up. Guys slash and get slashed on pretty much every shift. Again. If you don’t like it. Watch ringette or something. You are complaining about dick moves? The Canucks go through a bag full of dick moves every game. So does every other team. It’s called Hockey. There is a line and some players cross it. Some of them frequently. It’s really not that big of a deal.

"We love them, We mourn for them, Unlucky boys of Red" - Morrissey
"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"He's got a man deep..wait, no that IS Mandeep!!" - Don Taylor

by Section 312 on May 11, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

It’s easy to assess it after the fact and say you would do one thing or another. Thruth is, you never really know until you’re in that spot at that time. Especially when down in a game and frustrated. Ask the Canucks.

Initially I was pissed about it. But most if it was reraction to it being on one of our guys probably. Not like I haven’t sat there and hoped for a couple of crushing (clean) hits on Soup. Don’t wanna see him injured but if it aggravates anything bothering him, slows him down or makes him rush his decisions from there on in, that’s always the gameplan isn’t it?

I’ve also seen a hell of alot worse. I’d probably even have a different opinion if it was from Burish or Eager, and not Ladd (still like him).

Shove it in your addendum.

by kesrows on May 10, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Nucks Misconduct community! We scour the web to promptly bring you all of the Vancouver Canucks news when it happens in highly-opinionated fashion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Keith-magnuson-006272802_small
The Little Green Box
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
"How Do I Hate Thee? Let Me Count The Ways..

Recent FanPosts

Vancouver_canucks_logo_small
So the hockey "flu" has run its course
Small
Slumping Canucks Are Hottest Team in the NHL?
Knights-09_small
February 28/12 - Nucks at Yotes
Cimg0038_small
Nucks fans in Denver?
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote
Small
Whats that trade talk show during intermissions called?
Rnxbd00z_small
#EmbraceTheHate ; ASG Corporate Schmooze Edition
Stfulou_small
Rosterbation Time! Your Opinion On What Mike Gillis Needs To Do As The Trade Deadline Approaches

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Nucks Misconduct Store

Nmstore_thumb_medium
Your clothing sucks. Go fix it.

Canucks Stats

Stat

Forwards

Defense

Points

H. Sedin (52)

Edler (34)

Goals

D. Sedin (20)

Edler (7)

Assists

H. Sedin (41)

Edler (27)

Shots

D. Sedin (159)

Edler (131)

Hits

Lapierre (136)

Edler (97)

Blocked Shots

Kesler (38)

Edler (72)

ES TOI/G

H. Sedin (14.45)

Bieksa (17.75)

PP TOI/G

D. Sedin (3.56)

Edler (3.60)

PK TOI/G

Malhotra (2.63)

Hamhuis (3.08)

Corsi Rel QoC

Burrows (0.975)

Bieksa (0.951)

Zone Starts (OPCT)

D. Sedin (80%)
Malhotra (13%)

Edler (58%)
Tanev (36%)

Updated: January 22


Bartenders

Jasonmask_small Yankee Canuck

Stfulou_small Sean Zandberg

Keslerbomb2_small Kent Basky

Pub Regulars

Edlermirrorreversed_small missy

Rnxbd00z_small vancitydan

Img_8090_small nucksandpucks

Cameh_small camcharron

Screen_shot_2011-11-27_at_11 Jordan Clarke

Stanchion_logo_small The Stanchion

299352_525780999561_106000039_30560322_1772728798_n_small Ggooglyboogly

Bouncers

Colon_semi-colon3_small Semi_Colon