Friday Morning Coffee- Now You're A Man
Sidney Crosby would like you all to stop calling him the kid. NOW! Crosby elevates at the appropriate time in a game that wasn't nearly as shocking as the media are making it out to be, and the Canucks Pavol Demitra seals the deal in the real shocker of the tournament so far. Today's post features musical accompaniment from DVDA, better known as Trey Parker and Matt Stone of South Park fame. More after the break...
Many predicted that Canada would respond to the at the time shocking loss to the Swiss 4 years ago and just roll like they did against Norway. How anyone wouldn't think that Switzerland would come out and play us harder than they did the USA Tuesday is beyond me.
The Swiss showed glimpses of this in the 3rd period against the States, but not a full game like we saw against Canada. And despite jumping to a 2-0 lead, it wasn't a comfortable one, and you could feel the nation's heart sink a bit when Martin Brodeur got schooled on the shot by Ivo Ruthemann. Can't blame him on the second goal, but when you work hard sometimes you get those bounces and the Swiss did.
Last night was more about two things: Canada needing to fine tune some things, and an extremely hot goalie. In 2002 Canada lost an ugly one to Sweden to start the tournament. From that point on they played better after getting the scare (though 'The Speech' really turned it around). Lots of chances, lots of missed opportunities, and the Swiss did a great job of tying up sticks and getting in shooting lanes.
Crosby's shootout goal was brilliant, and a clear indication from Mike Babcock who the leader on this team is. Wit the pressure of an entire nation on his back, he stormed the net and fired one past Hiller. That's not a boy... that's a man.
Waking up to see the words "Slovakia" and "shootout" were pleasing enough, but to see that it was the Canucks' own Pavol Demitra with the winner? Brilliant!!! One thing I don't get is the insistence on many to call Canada the favorites of the tournament, with so many picking the Russians to win it all, and the IIHF ranking the Russians #1 in their pre-tournament list. While they may not be that strong defensively, this is a formidable foe. Enter a hot goalie.
Jaroslav Halak, as we Canuckleheads know is very capable of stealing a game, and he proved it again last night at Canada Hockey Place. The Russian team is a hard one to figure out. So much talent, yet at times they look utterly disinterested, and downright lazy. The chemistry is not there, and so far this power play that was supposed to strike fear into the hearts of the opposition has done anything but.
There are two ways you can look at the 6-1 win by the USA over Norway. One is to say that was an expectable result, a less talented squad did well to keep it semi-respectable. Or you can look at it and wonder if the USA can keep up with the other powers of this tournament. The score is fairly misleading, as 3 of the 6 US goals came in the final frame, and the US defense seemed to have their hands full with the Norwegians at times. Ryan Miller played well, but once again wasn't tested much.
And so it begins... the bitching, moaning and second guessing
Actually some didn't even wait for the game to be finished before hurling out the names of Vincent Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis and Mike Green. Even I wondered if a guy like Alexandre Burrows wasn't suited for a game like that, though that was as much a tongue in cheek comment as anything. This nation, led by it's sports media are panickers of the highest order. It was so disrespectful to not think the Swiss wouldn't come out the way they did, and perhaps we were lulled into a false sense of security by how passively they played the USA for 2 periods in their match.
But let me be clear: This is the team. It's Canada's team. So quit the "I knew they should have picked player x" garbage and for god's sake, would you seriously shut the hell up with the Luongo bashing? How about you drop your NHL loyalty for a couple weeks and get behind the only team that matters right now? I would be happy with either goalie playing against the USA Sunday, and feel confident knowing should they fall and Brodeur can't get it done, Roberto Luongo is there to step in. Some people however, want to do a post-mortem before the body's even dead.
It certainly adds a sense of urgency to Sunday's game, and no doubt this will bring out a lot of chirping from south of the border. Let them do it. This is a time for Canadians to be Canadians. Let them speak their peace, even if they're wrong. Let them get in your face, even if they're obnoxious about it. Let them talk all they want, and in true Canadian fashion: Deal with it on the ice. We will win on Sunday. Of that, I have no doubt.
0 recs |
35 comments
|
Comments
My proudest moment on twitter
besides coining the term #monsterbation, that is…
StanFischler
@Kent_Basky Enough with that hometown crybaby stuff.
Apparently the esteemed hockey writer didn’t like that
I responded like this
@StanFischler IIHF didn’t think we were the favorites, I want to know why the Swiss didn’t play this hard against the Americans
to this:
Was Canada’s near-loss a sign that something’s amiss with the so-called favorites? Maybe Uncle Sam will learn it.
http://waachcast.blogspot.com/ < WAACHCast Blog
by canucklehead666 on Feb 19, 2010 8:12 AM PST reply actions
Canada got Hiller’d and Russia got Halak’d. Any team can win because of performances like that. Czech can Vokoun you. Russia can Nabakov you. Sweden can Lundqvist you. USA can Miller you. And Canada can Brodeur/Luongo you. There are a lot of good goalies in this tourney that can win despite facing 45 shots a game.
Canada just needs to overcome. I’m not concerned… yet. The prelim rounds are all about getting your scares and finding your legs as a team. I’m no less confident about Canada at this point than I was before the tournament began. I’ve always felt they have the strongest overall team and thus the strongest overall chance, but there are a good number of teams that are capable of winning this thing.
by Beantown Canuck on Feb 19, 2010 8:38 AM PST reply actions
I wouldn’t say Russia got Halak’d – shots in the game were 37-33 in favour of Russia. I must say that Slovakia have impressed me in this tournament, I thought the game against the Czechs could have gone either way and they looked very good against Russia. I think this tournament is going to be a lot tighter than anyone realised and isn’t necessarily going to come down to Canada vs. Russia – there are a lot of other good hockey teams who are in with a shout of getting the gold.
by British Canuck on Feb 19, 2010 9:21 AM PST up reply actions
Don’t forget it was Finland Sweden in the Gold Medal game last time. And the Czechs have a very good team too. Very open tournament. Not like the women.
"We love them, We mourn for them, Unlucky boys of Red" - Morrissey
"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"He's got a man deep..wait, no that IS Mandeep!!" - Don Taylor
The Czechs trap trap trap. It works. They could win it all
by Sean Zandberg on Feb 19, 2010 6:24 PM PST up reply actions
Great Game
Well played, except for Visor Rick’s goalie crash, I think that merited a penalty, lost edge or not. How does Canada expect to Gold with Joe Thornton on this team? The guy has thoroughly, extensively, beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt proven he’s not a winner, should have put a grinder on in his place. LOL at the Canadian media, one shootout goal by Crosby and he’s the messiah.
Thornton
In my books, was one of the best players last night. Certainly centred the best line, by far, in my opinion.
And Crosby has always been the perceived messiah, incorrectly in my books.
Knights, Canucks, Dolphins, Jays and Raptors all the way.
Who scored the winner in the SO though?
"We love them, We mourn for them, Unlucky boys of Red" - Morrissey
"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"He's got a man deep..wait, no that IS Mandeep!!" - Don Taylor
by Section 312 on Feb 19, 2010 10:42 AM PST up reply actions
Scoring a goal on his second attempt after the team forced Brodeur to make 3 stops to even get him that chance?
Eh.
Knights, Canucks, Dolphins, Jays and Raptors all the way.
Or Malkin. Malkin didn’t even want to take a shot. He didn’t even care if it would cost his team the game.
What the hell is wrong with Malkin? Stanley Cup hangover?
by Sean Zandberg on Feb 19, 2010 6:25 PM PST up reply actions
Thornton played a good game, and dominated the face-off circle. Admittedly he has this stigma that follows him around for failing in big games, but in all honesty the Sedins had that same stigma and more following them around for years. If his performance does drop and he stops playing physical (No-Show-Joe) then we have the depth to play other lines, or even play a different legit center on that line (Getzlaf would be an interesting fit).
Crosby was clutch. He had the game on his stick and solved the toughest goaltending puzzle so far in the Olympics.
He’s also the best of a very deep and very good pool of Canadian players. If he was Russian people would be creaming their pants over him like they do with Ovie.
"We love them, We mourn for them, Unlucky boys of Red" - Morrissey
"Giggs gets past Viera, past Dixon, who comes back at him, it's a wonderful run from GIGGS!!!" - Martin Tyler
"He's got a man deep..wait, no that IS Mandeep!!" - Don Taylor
by Section 312 on Feb 19, 2010 10:55 AM PST up reply actions
I agree. Mind you, I still like Ovie better. But Crosby is under-respected in uppity hockey circles. He’s the real deal.
by Beantown Canuck on Feb 19, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions
I think we’ve yet to see the best Crosby has to offer, but we will at this tournament
My only concern with Canada was the seeming reluctance to respond physically… can’t say I blame them partially, because Canadians have been savaged by officials in past international events for simply playing the Canadian style of game. They need to play physical against the US team Sunday
http://waachcast.blogspot.com/ < WAACHCast Blog
by canucklehead666 on Feb 19, 2010 11:01 AM PST reply actions
My only concern with Canada was the seeming reluctance to respond physically
I think that will come when they play the USA
by Sean Zandberg on Feb 19, 2010 6:26 PM PST up reply actions
just found out I will be on the Jabberhocky ’net radio show Sunday before the game to represent the Canadian p.o.v. Will post details when I get them
http://waachcast.blogspot.com/ < WAACHCast Blog
by canucklehead666 on Feb 19, 2010 11:30 AM PST reply actions
Well I’m not a Canadian fan (doesn’t really bother me who wins) but I was suprised that St Louis wasn’t picked
I think they were going with chemistry. If Stamkos gets selected then St. Louis is a no brainer as well. They have the Sharks top line along with Getzlaf and Perry. Then there’s Iginla, Crosby, and Nash. Stamkos and St. Louis are more top 6 type players and I don’t really think they should be on a checking line. They’re good but this was more about having roles filled I think.
I had a problem with Getzlaf’s play last night. He gave away the puck around half a dozen times maybe. He also played too non-chalantly and slow. I’m not going to buy the ankle injury excuse because he had a chance to sit out and let Jeff Carter play. In fact, that line of Staal-Getzlaf-Perry is underwhelming and showing surprisingly little chemistry.
I knew the Swiss weren’t gonna be a cakewalk. As I said in the game thread, they impressed me with how fast, physical, and positioning sound they played. I believe their coach is Canadian so maybe he knew how to defend against us. Of course, they also got all-world goaltending from Hiller.
Sunday’s game should be amazing. The question is: Do you start Luongo or Brodeur? I think Brodeur played fine last night although he maybe should’ve stopped the 1st goal and the 2nd was a bad bounce. He was great in the shootout obviously. I still believe that it’s his job to lose, if he falters on Sunday I think I pull him.
Poutine & Meatballs
I heard that Brodeur was already announced for Sunday. Haven’t seen anything official though. Anyone?
by Beantown Canuck on Feb 19, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions
but, for all the ineffectiveness of the second line, do you blame Getzlaf and Perry or do you blame Staal?
Yes, I agree, Getzlaf didn’t play the game he could, not very physical AND turnover prone. But on that second line, it was Perry/Getzlaf working together, while Staal was left picking up the pieces.
The more I watch, the more I’m impressed with that 4th line of Morrow, Toews and Richards (especially Toews and Richards). Also, is it surprising to anyone that the most physical forward so far, is arguably, Patrice Bergeron?
by Vancouverguy on Feb 19, 2010 8:22 PM PST up reply actions
1st goal Brodeur probably should’ve had. Before the second goal Pronger does something incredibly stupid although I guess for Pronger that’s normal. I understand he’s there to be a big physical presence on the blueline but he should at least pretend he has a brain sometimes.
Rosterbation
Rumor from the underbelly of the Web, CSNNE
Two different NHL sources have confirmed that the B’s are indeed zeroing in on a defenseman, and one source further indicated that 27-year-old Nashville Predators defenseman Dan Hamhuis could be Boston GM Peter Chiarelli’s main target.
My hopes exceed my expectations
-WeepingTile
Hamhuis..from my home town. I’ve got some sources…
by Sean Zandberg on Feb 19, 2010 6:29 PM PST up reply actions

by 
























