Nucks Misconduct: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Preseason Top 25 Rankings

Canucks' defense looks solid, but who makes the roster?

In one glorious day in late-August the Canucks' blue-line went from patchy to solid, and fans who feared that the defence corps would be Vancouver's Achilles heel in 09/10 began to breathe much easier.

By adding Mathieu Schneider, Christian Ehrhoff and Brad Lukowich to a blue-line that already features Kevin Bieksa, Alex Edler, Willie Mitchell and (65% of the time) Sami Salo, GM Mike Gillis went a long way to effectively addressing the Canucks' most pressing needs. Oh yeah, we also have Shane O'Brien.

Suddenly the Canucks went from praying that Aaron Rome could settle into full-time NHL employment and that Sami Salo would miraculously survive a season without serious injury (hey, Martin Havlat finally pulled it off last season with Chicago, so miracles can happen) to salivating at the prospect of Top 6 that is good enough to exclude O'Brien, Rome and Lawrence Nycholat instead of banking on them to step up. Nothing against those guys - or Evan Oberg for that matter - but counting on surprising breakout performances is kinda like going all-in in poker with 2-7 and hoping for the best. Sure it could work out, but more often that not you'll be screwed.

Star-divide

So, as the preseason concludes its final week, what will the Canucks blue-line look like to start the season? Does O'Brien crack the Top 6? Does Alain Vigneault reward Oberg for a strong preseason with a roster spot? What happens with Lukowich? Does a veteran d-man get sacrificed, either through trade or banishment to the minors, to clear salary cap space?

Here is who I see in the Canucks' defensive corps come opening night: Bieksa, Edler, Mitchell, Salo, Ehrhoff, Schnider (assuming he's good to go). Yeah, kinda obvious selections I know - but can you really see the two prize acquisitions not in the line-up or anyone unseating one the four Canucks blue-line vets? I have a tough time imagining it.

Assuming that this is the case, the Canucks will presumably carry one extra d-man. I would give the edge to O'Brien, but give Oberg an outside shot at taking this spot. Would Vigneault carry eight defensemen? That's a possibility, but will it do Oberg any good to sit in the press-box when he could be getting quality minutes in Manitoba?

Obviously the play of bubble players will dictate the answer to many of these questions. Oberg could force the coaching staff's hand with a strong week. But then what happens to O'Brien? And what about Lukowich? Would a strong push by the veteran this week land him a roster spot as a depth guy? Anyone else who you think could still crack the roster?

Clearly I am raising more questions than I am answering. However, unlike a month ago, I am excited to be asking questions. Mike Gillis has given his coaching staff a whole whack of blue-line options and suddenly an area that looked to be a potential weak spot has become a potential strength for this club. And hey, it's good to have depth - 'cause I'm putting the over/under on games for which both Salo and Schneider are injured at 15.

Poll
Which of these defenceman will be on the Canucks' roster to start the season?
Shane O'Brien
210 votes
Evan Oberg
47 votes
Aaron Rome
40 votes
Michael Funk
3 votes
None of the above
55 votes

355 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 50 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Did you leave out Lukowich on purpose? He’s the odd man out in my eyes.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Sep 22, 2009 2:57 PM PDT reply actions  

My bad

Nope, just completely forgot to include him! It’s not like I talk about him in the article or anything (bangs head against wall).

by nucksandpucks on Sep 22, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bah! Lukowich is a sure thing to make it :)
No really, I hope he does make it.

by Sean Zandberg on Sep 22, 2009 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

No doubt in my mind Oberg is not on the team, barring trading away 2 vets. You’re missing a key factor: the veterans will not get banished to the minors. They’ll get picked up on waivers by other teams. The only one with a shot of possibly passing waivers I would guess would be Lukowich, and quite frankly he’s been solid enough to make the team during preseason.

I was at last night’s game and I though SOB played a great game. I believe he set up the lead pass to Welly’s breakaway that led to the penalty shot goal. And he had some nice puck movement all around as well as some pretty good defensive play. He’s leaner and meaner and looks more than anything like a player determined to make this team. He does not want to get sent to crapsville by waiver or by trade, he remembers what it was like playing in Tampa. I’m confident he will make this team barring something crazy or a trade.

I have to feel a trade is coming. And my gut says it will be one of the $3mill+ salaried top 4 d-men, since we need to be dropping some salary by Oct 1.

So I see it as this:

4 of these players: Bieksa, Salo, Edler, Mitchell, Ehrhoff. Presumably Mitchell and Salo will remain since I believe they have NTCs and MG says he won’t trade anyone with such a clause. Although he also once said that he wouldn’t sign a player to one of those crafy back-ended contracts, and look what he did with Lu. As much as it hurts, Mitchell is the most logical to trade, with this being a contract year and with his game, as excellent as it is, being one-dimensional. And I think we can get value back for him.

Then along with whomever the 4 left are, Schneider and O’Brien will also make the team, with Lukowich as a 7th d-men kept as an interchangeable skratch (i.e. plays when Salo is out, or AV is pissed at SOB). Oberg is first call up from minors, and Sauve might be second. Nycholat and Rome will be sent down and need to pass waivers. If they survive waivers and we can keep them in Manitoba as potential extra spares, awesome. Should we actually need them, I think we’re in trouble whether they’re still there or not!

by Beantown Canuck on Sep 22, 2009 2:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Wow, you think Sauve is ready? I haven’t seen much of the preseason games but I read reports saying he still needed some work.

Maybe Calgary can take Nycholat off our hands again. I don’t see him or Rome passing through waivers. Someone always needs a spare D man out there.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Sep 22, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Sauve is ready, but like you I’m not sure how long Rome/Nycholat will be around with waivers and whatnot. And in theory, Sauve is somewhere in our future plans, although probably 2 years away. So if you’re going to have someone around, and someone you can send back and forth to the farm with no risks, Sauve seems the best candidate. If you note, even without Rome/Nycholat, I’m putting him 9th on our depth. That’s pretty far down there. 9th depth d-man shouldn’t get more the 3-4 games a year, tops. And only 5 mins in each of those games. Otherwise, it means we have big injury trouble, and in that case, Gillis needs to do more than Nycholat/Rome/Sauve.

by Beantown Canuck on Sep 22, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Got to agree with yank’ on Rome. He has been very noticeable in the preseason. I think you are bang on with the rest Beantown.

Not sure if Mitchell has a NMC or not. Nonis usually gave them with EVERYBODY he signed.

I think Bieksa is without one, but damn, he’s Juice…and underrated in my opinion. Flames fans have been boastful of J’Bo, but Bieksa had more points and a better +/- in less games last year.

For 3.5 for another season after this one…I think you keep him. Schneider just got here, same as Ehrhoff…doubt they go, but you never know. Edler is one you HAVE to keep, don’t you?

Got to say Beantown, bang on with S.O.B…he has been one of the best in the preseason. Much quicker (like most of the team…give Roger Takahashi a raise!).

Oberg looks great, but he will be the #1 pairing D’man in the AHL. Sauve is better this year, but he is one you send back to junior…he’ll be a #1 D’man on his team too.

Its funny, ‘Nucks just plain forgot about Luko, but that is his game, essentially. Rock Solid and steady D’. We need another Babych type like him, don’t we…?

Decisions, decisions. Guess we find out what the Gillis plan is soon, some cute happen by Friday, we are told.

vancitydan

by vancitydan on Sep 22, 2009 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure that you can send a vet to the minors without him clearing waivers before the season starts. Getting him back is the tricky part, but it’s an effective way to bury salary. Pretty sure this is what happened to Mogilny in NJ a few years back.

Could have my facts wrong though, so I stand to be corrected. But that’s what I was suggesting when I wrote that.

by nucksandpucks on Sep 22, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

It actually looks like Mogilny cleared waiver given his large salary and injury history at the time. New Jersey was supposedly on the hook for cap hit (because of the age 35+ signing), but I believe the NHL eventually agreed that Mogilny was injured long-term so he was placed on IR and the Devils got the long term injury cap relief.

by SJKel on Sep 22, 2009 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Luko has a 1-way contract. I’m pretty sure he’d have to hit the waiver wire…or does he have to play a certain amount of games here first?

by Sean Zandberg on Sep 22, 2009 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough, looks like I’m off base about the possibility of sending guys to the minors without losing them via waivers. Come to think of it, it’s a dumb idea anyway – because if they’re claim-worthy then you’d have to leave ’em there all year, and most vets probably would not be keen to return to your team after a full season banishment (though I recall the Kings playing this game with a younger goalie a couple years back).

Still, when the trade with the Sharks went through, everyone kinda figured that Lukowich may end up on waivers/in the AHL. I like him too, and hope it doesn’t happen, but there is a pretty huge defensive logjam at the moment.

by nucksandpucks on Sep 22, 2009 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with one of the posters above who argued that Mitchell could be the guy to be traded. As much as I love Willie and the fact that he’s a local boy, in my opinion he’s the most expendable of the “Big 4”—Mitchell, Bieksa, Salo. Edler. I also thought that he and Ohlund played the worst of the defencemen in the Chicago series.

by mrjauk on Sep 22, 2009 4:10 PM PDT reply actions  

I have to feel a trade is coming. And my gut says it will be one of the $3mill+ salaried top 4 d-men, since we need to be dropping some salary by Oct 1.

I’m starting to think the same thing. Mitchell? Oh god….please no. But it is possible. Or is it? We don’t need 5 out of 6 guys being puck movers / offensive defencemen either.

by Sean Zandberg on Sep 22, 2009 5:07 PM PDT reply actions  

I’m leaning toward SOB being pitched, but I also think Salo would bring a decent return in exchange if something could be worked out with him, and would ease the finances a lot. Fine defenceman, I like him (Salo) a lot, but only when he plays.

by Thursday on Sep 22, 2009 5:28 PM PDT reply actions  

I think something that’s easily overlooked is the possibility of players on 1-way contracts going to Manitoba and how most owners wouldn’t probably greenlight that. I remember reading about how thankful we should be that Gillis even had the possibility of making these deals, since he’s throwing around a lot of money that isn’t his at all.

That being said, I don’t see Schneider starting the season, with Lukowich and SOB fighting for that 6th spot. It always stood out to me how few minutes SOB got last year compared to the other 5, so I wonder how Vigneault is going to balance it this time. My bet is that Mitchell will see a reduction in ice time, because let’s face it, he’s slow. He’s a good defenceman, but I’m not sure he’s worth the money he’s getting.

by thelastjohnny on Sep 22, 2009 5:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Guessing

that is why AV is telling the media Schneider doesn’t know what he’s saying when he’s telling them he’ll be ready for game 1.

by yoata on Sep 22, 2009 6:13 PM PDT reply actions  

with you yoata

I think another top 6 d man may come up lame in the last week of camp and pof problem solved.

by Kelownakid on Sep 22, 2009 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Temporarily at least

won’t be long before somebody’s going to get moved though.

by yoata on Sep 22, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

hmmm maybe

but think two years ago we could have gone the whole season using this manouver and it would have been legit.

by Kelownakid on Sep 22, 2009 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

At some point, something’s gotta give. Gillis is delaying the decision as long as possible and that makes sense, but eventually someone’s getting moved cuz we’re over the cap.

I also think Demitra’s gonna get moved if Shirok continues to pan out. Even if Demitra could come back, given all our fw’s, his ice time would be reduced in a contract year, which can’t be good for him. So he might want to move at this point to a team that will play him lots, let him rack up the points, then re-sign him to a 2 year deal.

Putting it together I could see something like this: Demitra + a 3.5m-4.0m D-Man (+ a young fw? + Schneider?). That’d not only solve our cap probs, it would leave room for a very good sniper in return.

But what do I know?

by casual on Sep 22, 2009 7:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Sorry, more thoughts: would Demitra’s PP time be reduced if Shirok looks good w/the twins? You’d have M. Schneider back on the point, too, so no need to put Demitra back there, so … how’s Demitra gonna rack up the points he needs to make next contract – which might well be his last really good one, given his age – everything he hopes it can be?

by casual on Sep 22, 2009 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mitchell and Salo have NTCs and Gillis has made it quite clear that they will not ask players to waive their NTCs. So I think those two will likely not be moved.

Edler is definitely a keeper, he could be a poor man’s Lidstrom in the future IMO.

Ehrhoff is like another Edler, but 4 years older and maybe a better skater. I think he could be a candidate to be moved, and would fetch a good return.

Bieksa, we need to keep for his grittiness, leadership and offensive ability. I feel that SOB is a poor man’s Bieksa, so he’s the most expendable.

Lukowich could fill in the 6th or 7th D-man role no problem. The Stanley Cup experience will help the team, and he could be another body for the PK shifts.

I don’t think this defensive depth is a bad problem to have at all. :D

by cyxj on Sep 22, 2009 7:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Why would he bring in Erhoff with the price of Lukowich if he was planning on moving him?

by thelastjohnny on Sep 22, 2009 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was planning on giving himself breathing room. Options. Not be stuck in a corner at the last minute needing to get d-men. Now he’s in a position of strength with d-men to sell.

by Beantown Canuck on Sep 22, 2009 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dead on, Beantown.

I remember last month before I went on my vacation, the Canucks only had 5 NHL-ready D-men (Bieksa, Salo, Edler, Mitchell, SOB) and I was thinking about how they need 1-2 more guys ASAP before training camp. And when I came back 1.5 weeks later, I was so glad to find that they picked up Schneider, Ehrhoff, and Lukowich and gave up very little in return (2 so-so prospects).

There’s also the economic point of view to consider. If he was stuck with the situation before picking up the 3 new guys, asking prices for quality D-men would be higher due to demand. But now, MG has the hammer on trades since quality/depth D-men are pretty scarce.

by cyxj on Sep 22, 2009 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

trust in mike, he’ll manage to do something. i think we’ve all seen he gets what he wants, sit back and let him work it out. have no fear…

by kiyotok on Sep 22, 2009 9:13 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm a little worried

about what he wants, he wanted Sundin for 2x $10M last year.
Also, having options is good but not sure I’d call having to get under the cap last minute “dealing from strength”.

Fact is they’ve got at least 1 maybe 2 too many dmen and at least 2 maybe 3 too many forwards (if they keep Shirokov and Hodgson), and not a lot of time to do anything about it.

Bit more wiggle room with the forwards as at least some of them have 2-way deals, but if you want to ice the best team you have…

by yoata on Sep 22, 2009 10:26 PM PDT reply actions  

First off.. I work at a very boring job.. pays decent, but its boring as fuck.

That being said i have a lot of time to think about silly things like.. well this. Who is going to be cut out of the Vancouver Canucks defense this season? I can honestly say i have no idea.. no hunch if you will..

One things for sure, it’s going to be interesting to see what happens come Oct 1st.

by okgo570 on Sep 22, 2009 10:29 PM PDT reply actions  

With Demitra on the LTIR, Gillis has us near the cap already, so he has time to make a deal. As long as Demitra delays his return, Gillis can take his time – up to a point, of course – in finding the best deal. I presume he’s already lined up some possibilities.

Demitra’s pace of recovery couldn’t have timed out better if we’d planned it that way, could it? :)

Oh, and yoata …lately the glass has been kinda half-empty for you, hasn’t it? Take heart! We’re in good shape, fellow fan, and we’re set for a great season!

by casual on Sep 23, 2009 12:52 PM PDT reply actions  

That’s that optimism stuff I’ve read about, isn’t it? I just don’t know…

I've seen enough to know that I've seen too much.

by Smoboy41 on Sep 23, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it’s all last minute. I think they are kicking tires on trading partners now already. Wouldn’t you?

by Sean Zandberg on Sep 23, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't see it as pessimism

so much as realism, but I agree there’s reason for optimism, I’m just not as confident in Gillis as some and really hope he doesn’t waste the opportunity this team has of going from close to contending to actual contenders. Sometimes these windows aren’t open as long as you think they might be.

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Somebody has to be cautious about Gillis. The rest of us are in love with the guy! You’re the potential balancing force, but you are outnumbered to hell :)

by Sean Zandberg on Sep 23, 2009 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

What I don't understand

is why?

What has he actually done?

His big acquisitions (Soup, Demitra, Bernier, Wellwood) have all been disappointments, no?

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

No.

Demitra is overpaid because he signed with a team other FAs weren’t interested in; Sundin I’m not even going near, becuase we already know the opinion there and I think we’ll have to agree to disagree; Bernier was signed to a “we’ll see” contract and pulled in some scoring and looks much better this year; and Wellwood had a career season for goals last year and is likewise looking much better this season.

This pre-season has solid competition at every position; the scouting has been expanded tremendously and could pay off dividends sooner than thought; and keeping AV looks like a solid choice despite the usual case of new GMs bringing in their own guys ASAP.

All told, it’s still too soon to judge his moves, but I trust him. I liked Nonis as well, and was disappointed when he was let go; but I’m reasonably happy with the direction of the team right now.

by Thursday on Sep 23, 2009 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sort of off-topic but … if Shirok makes the team, then we get lines like these (which you can shuffle around as you like cuz the actual combinations per se aren’t what I’m talking about here):

Sedin-Sedin-Samuelsson
Shirok-Kesler-Burrows
Raymond-Wellwood-Bernier
someone-Johnson-someone
(plus someone as the spare fw)

So we have 3 slots open above for “someone”, and competing for them are 6 players, meaning 3 have to go, likely one of these:

Grabner, Demitra, Hodgson, Rypien, Hordi, Hansen

I expect Grabner to be sent down. That’s 1.

I expect Demitra to be traded. That’s 2.

So we’re down to just one other player who won’t make it on day one, which overall is not that bad a decision to have to make.

It can’t be Hansen cuz he’s just too good to lose to waivers.

Hodgson should really be the spare fw where he can train w/the team and get some ice time during games. If he goes back to Brampton he spins his wheels for a year, then probably goes to the Moose after that, and that’s two full years of his career right there at a time when he’s on the cusp, and after that Schroeder could be here. So I expect the Canucks to keep him.

That leaves Rypien and Hordi. Which brings me to a q: can we send either one of them down, even temporarily, then recall them safely later on? What kinds of contracts do they have? If it’s possible, I’d bet one of them goes down (Hordi?), at least for a while. If not, then Shirok might be the one who has to go till a trade can be arranged lest we lose talent and get nothing in return.

by casual on Sep 23, 2009 6:01 PM PDT reply actions  

I like

Sedin Sedin Shirokov
Burrows Kesler Samuelsson
Demitra Hodgson Raymond
Rypen Wellwood Hansen
Bernier

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe, but the same q about contract status still comes up, this time also including Johnson, another player I’d hate to lose to waivers; he’s just too good for that.

So we either make a trade, or we start figuring out who can go up & down w/out cost and ship those guys to the Moose while we scratch our heads a little longer.

by casual on Sep 23, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really like this line-up, with Rypien and Hansen on the 4th line and Hordi in the press box or let go.

by cyxj on Sep 23, 2009 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd just rather

not lose young talent like Hansen in order to hang on to role players, as effective as Johnson is, can’t somebody with more upside do his job? We know he can’t do theirs.

What’s Grabner’s status, can he be demoted without clearing waivers?

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 6:12 PM PDT reply actions  

So you don’t think Hansen is a role player?

I've seen enough to know that I've seen too much.

by Smoboy41 on Sep 23, 2009 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not many on the team can take defensive zone faceoffs and block shots as or more effectively than RJ.

by cyxj on Sep 23, 2009 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Stats ?

Out of Wellwood, Raymond and Hansen, which player had the best ppg last season?

hint: the same one that had the best +/- of the three, and the lowest TOI/g of the three.

2nd hint, he also had almost zero PP time while the other two had 2-3 mins per game each.

Oh and he’s also the youngest and cheapest of the three…

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think you meant to direct this at me… but I want to contribute:

I believe that it depends on their linemates too.

Hansen got to play with Burr and Kess most of the time, who are strong defensively (+/-) and good at puck pursuit (points as a result). Wellwood had to play with RockHands/Bernier and Pyatt or Raymond mostly, so you know he isn’t racking up many assists there. Raymond was pretty much a plugger in the lineup last year, can’t expect much when he gets moved around so often.

by cyxj on Sep 23, 2009 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm

Hansen surely played some with Kes and Burr (everybody plays with everybody on AV’s team) but it was hardly most of the time, the simple fact those two are in the top 4 in TOI/g while Hansen was 11th among forwards proves that, and more importantly, clearly, despite his superior ppg with less opportunity, AV did not see Hansen as an offensive player (no surprise to me) since he gave him virtually no opportunities on the PP, while Wellwood and Raymond both had plenty, not to mention more TOI/g.

by yoata on Sep 24, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think

he has a lot more upside than some of the other guys and has actually shown more as a Canuck (with less opportunity) than even Bernier or Wellwood have, let alone Johnson or Hordichuk, at a younger age and for less money (a lot less in Bernier’s case).

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 6:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Hansen is a role player today, but he’s clearly developing into more than that, too. He should become a solid 2-way fw in the future, a 2nd or 3rd line player on most teams, and that day is not that far off. That’s way too much to jut give away.

RJ is a great 4th liner, too. He can skate like the wind and he plays hard whenever called upon, never complains. I like him.

We have too many good fw’sthat we might not be able to send down so we gotta look at who we can send down for now even as we look for a trade (both for cap and for personnel reasons).

by casual on Sep 23, 2009 6:22 PM PDT reply actions  

I like

Johnson too, but I’d rather lose a guy who’s potential we know is that of a checker, than lose a guy whose potential upside is far greater.

I think Hansen gets grabbed immediately if he has to be put on waivers to get sent down (or back up).

by yoata on Sep 23, 2009 6:25 PM PDT reply actions  

For sure somebody would nab him.

by Sean Zandberg on Sep 24, 2009 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Nucks Misconduct community! We scour the web to promptly bring you all of the Vancouver Canucks news when it happens in brutally honest and highly-opinionated fashion.
Start posting about the Canucks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Trevorlinden_small
Beantown lawyered them Toronto folk right and good!

Recent FanPosts

Seanprofile2_small
Sedins To Make Appearance At NHL 11 Launch in Burnaby
Small
Cup run a cakewalk or are Canucks creampuffs?
Canucks_alt_small
5 Reasons Why The GZ Expat Loves the Canucks
Vancouver_millionaires_small
Raffi Torres: Worth it?
Canucks_alt_small
Moving Sucks...except
Gabe_and_stanley_small
Third Line Forwards?
Jp_small
Luongo Writes Foreword For James Duthie Book
Jp_small
Canucks At 40 Book Available Early
Small
5 Reasons Why I Love the Canucks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Follow The Misconduct

Facebook-128x128_medium
Twitter-128x128_medium

SBNation.com Recent Stories

National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman answers questions during a pre-game media availability before the Pittsburgh Penguins season opener against the New York Rangers in a NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar) +24 updates

Ultimatum? NHL Reportedly Threatens To Toss Out Kovalchuk, Luongo Deals Without NHLPA Concessions

CHICAGO - APRIL 07: Antti Niemi #31 of the Chicago Blackhawks takes a break during a game against the St. Louis Blues at the United Center on April 7, 2010 in Chicago, Illinois. The Blackhawks defeated the Blues 6-5. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) +3 updates

Antti Niemi Reportedly Signs One-Year, $2 Million Deal With Sharks

Photo +3 updates

SB Nation's Mock NHL Expansion Draft: Introducing Our Two New General Managers

More from SBNation.com >


Bartenders

Jasonmask_small Yankee Canuck

Seanprofile2_small Sean Zandberg

Pub Regulars

Bcmf_small WAACH 'Cast

Vancouver046cropped_small missy

Flyers_canucks_historical_small Smoboy41

6_058_small nucksandpucks