Canucks Blogger Roundtable, Part I
Sweet merciful Ehrhoff, real hockey starts in less than two weeks and there remains much to talk about with the Canucks. Who stays and who goes? Burrows or Samuelsson on the first line? Schneider or Raycroft in net? Hodgson or Wellwood on the third line? Lukowich or O'Brien in the top eight? Mila Kunis or Megan Fox just because?
See? Big questions. To help analyze the issues, Sean and I got together with some notable Vancouver bloggers for a round table discussion, including the great folks behind Canucks Hockey Blog, Canucks Corner, Canucks Army, 24 Hours and The Sports Corner.
Click through the jump to check out the group's take on what to expect from Ryan Kesler following his breakout year and what the future holds for Cory Schneider.
The questions posed to the group in the first part of the roundtable were:
1. Is Ryan Kesler coming into his own or was last year's productive outburst more the result of Mats Sundin playing on his line?
2. With Luongo here until the next ice age, what is Cory Schneider's best value to the franchise right now: back up or trade chip?

Sean Zandberg, Nucks Misconduct
1. I'm a little torn on how Kesler is going to perform offensively this coming season. In 2005-06 he scored .28 points per game. In 2006-07 he scored .33 points per game. In 2007-08 he managed .46 points per game. Last season he scored .72 points per game. That's drastic increase, and many of those points came after the RPM line was formed. Mats Sundin (and even Pavol Demitra) did help Kesler offensively but, Kesler was also given a bigger scoring role. I think we'll see Kesler max out as a 60 point player, even without Sundin. as he is 25 years old and is still maturing. I don't see much more upside to him than that. Hope I'm wrong, but he is a Selke nominee after all. He plays a 2-way game.
2. The Schneider issue is a tough one. After his brilliant performance in the AHL last year, it's just a matter of time before he becomes a starting goalie in the NHL. I think he'd fit in well with a 2-tier goalie system in the NHL right now to help his maturation process. I don't think Luongo should play less games so that Schneider can play more. Lou thrives on more games played and he has made that clear in the past.
If he's traded, it would be out of mercy so that he can get those minutes elsewhere. But then who would start in Manitoba with Andrew Raycroft backing Luongo? I'd keep Schneider around this season at least until the overall goaltending issue in Vancouver and Manitoba is resolved. His value can only go up from here (hopefully). My opinion on this wavers I'll admit.
Mike The Yank, Nucks Misconduct
1. Forget Sundin, Kesler is definitely coming into his own. He crushed his shots per game and points per game pace over the last three years and earned that Selke nod at the end of last season. Sundin was beneficial because he drew more defensive attention away from Kes but, more important than that, I'm sure it was an exchange of intangibles like experience and leadership that Sundin shared during his 30 seconds in town that will help round out Kes and his game. I actually expect him to have fewer points this year, but his play will remain elevated and - couple in the fact it's a contract season - it'll become obvious quickly how strong a player he's become now.
And, seriously, forget Sundin.
2. Sadly, Schneider has to go. No chance he's going to waste away behind Luongo. But he'll have to live in the uncomfortable nature of this marriage for a bit of time. I don't care what Raycroft does, I have zero faith in him as as back-up. Schneider needs to first earn then accept his role as the back-up and get more NHL experience under his belt. Hopefully there will be plenty of time (that massive road trip in the winter comes to mind) that he can get in there. I'm sure Gillis has some feelers out there, but you have to keep Schneider for now and let him showcase his stuff. Maybe towards the deadline you move him. Or you wait until a Labarbera-type back-up is available on the cheap and you pull the trigger then. But the goal should be two-fold: get Schneider more experience and keep Raycroft firmly ensconced in Manitoba.

Cam Davie, Canucks Army
1. He definitely came into his own, but I think that was sparked primarily by the presence of Sundin. I think it has more to do with Sundin coming on board, that it does Kesler doing this all on his own. Starting January 1, Kesler's goals, assists and points per game stats all went up dramatically. He was also taking more shots per game. In fact after the All-Star Break, Kesler went 17-17-34 in 34 GP. That's a GREAT pace, but it's sure a lot easier to get more shots and score more points when you have a horse like Sundin on the ice. The test for Kesler will start October 1st. We know he can do it, but will he?
2. Schneider needs to be showcased in the NHL now --- then traded. It's great that he won the AHL Goaltender of the Year, but there is a noticeable leap from the minors to the NHL and I think that most NHL coaches and GM's are very aware of this. Schneider has had this weird trajectory throughout his playing career, where he starts poorly at a particular level, then rebounds and does incredibly well. He did in college, he did in the AHL, and he's likely to do that in the NHL. With that said, once he proves himself as a solid NHL goalie, after 10 games or so, it's time to ship him out. I would suspect that he will be traded either around Christmas or at the trading deadline. The Canucks should be able to get some good value for him. He's a confident, smart kid with loads of talent and upside. That's a valuable asset to any team. Well, any time that hasn't just signed their goalie captain to a 12-year extension.
Brian Wawryshyn, Canucks Corner
I think there is little doubt that Kesler is coming into his own, not only as a player, but as a leader on this team. He wants to win and that was evidenced by the fact he spoke about players taking less to be part of a winning team. We'll see if that holds true when/if he signs his extension. He does need someone to play with though, because I don't think he's the type of player that is THE key to a line, but he's one hell of a complimentary player. In my opinion, if Kesler has a good line to support him, he's capable of 30 goals and being the responsible defensive player that saw him nominated for the Selke last season.
2. I think the ideal situation is to have Schneider start the year in Vancouver as Luongo's backup and then hope he shines when he gets his chance. There probably aren't that many takers right now with every team knowing that eventually the Canucks are going to have to cut ties with Schneider, if not by trade then when he becomes a free agent, because there is no way he signs in Vancouver again with Luongo here for life. Once the dust settles and we get into the season, teams may see the value of Schneider if he plays well and start making some calls to Mike Gillis.
We all know how patient Gillis is and the fact is he doesn't need to do anything with Schneider right now. Not a bad problem to have.
JJ Guerrero, Canucks Hockey Blog
1. I think it's a bit of both. Kesler showed glimpses of what he can do offensively when he scored 21 goals in 07/08. That he was able to build on that is a good sign that he has more offense than Canucks fans originally gave him credit for. But at the same time, I don't think he would have been able to do it without Mats and Pavol drawing defenders and creating space for him. The question going into this season is whether he could produce similar numbers without those two players playing next to him (at least without Pavol for the first part of the season).
2. I'm in the minority who doesn't believe Cory Schneider will be traded this year. The fact is, the only other NHL-caliber goalie in the organization (besides Luongo of course) is Andrew Raycroft, and after disastrous stints in Toronto and Colorado, calling him an NHL-caliber goalie might be a stretch. Unless Mike Gillis has plans to bring in another goaltender, he won't trade Schneider.
I think the best-case scenario is if Schneider wins the back-up job behind Luongo and proves that he can play in the NHL. At that point, he'll bring the most value in trade. Gillis can afford to be patient - remember that Schneider's only 23 and is still an RFA at the end of the season.
Rich Loat, Canucks Hockey Blog
1. Ryan Kesler was coming into his own before Sundin finally arrived and while there were the many intangibles that can be attributed to Sundin's play which may have aided Kesler. However he's been developing on his own over the last few years and I think his productive outburst towards the end of last year was more so him elevating his play down the stretch than it was a result of Sundin's timely return.
I expect Kesler to return to where he left off last year and have an even better year as we haven't really seen what Ryan Kesler is capable of yet. Last year he started as the third line center and his point production increase can arguably be attributed to his elevation to the second line when given that top 6 forward ice time. With Kesler starting on the second line this year we're going to see what he's really capable of.
2. With the Canucks' backs against the cap Gillis' move to bring in Raycroft was a blunt statement that Raycroft was going to be the bench warming backup that played as many games as can be counted on your fingers. Cory on most other teams would be a lock for backup, however no one saw the Canucks landing a superstar goaltender in all those years we hailed Schneider as our next starting tender.
There's inevitably some injury in the pre-season, and there's more than a handful of teams that would love Cory Schneider as their goalie. I think Gillis' best play is to ship Schneider off in a trade because if you wait until he hits free agency you've already lost him.
1. Ryan Kesler's offensive outburst has nothing to do with Mats Sundin. Besides the season where he got injured, Kesler's point production has increased year by year, and I doubt that'll change this time around. He is still only 25 years old, with plenty more time to develop into a top-line forward, and if anything, he's the one making the difference on whichever line he plays on.
2. If the right deal comes along, Mike Gillis will most likely pull the trigger and move Cory Schneider. He's a solid trade bait and look for him to be shopped around closer to the trade deadline. Schneider is not NHL-proven, which might diminish his value a little bit, but any team in need of a future goaltender should look to Schneider first. There's very little gain in having the youngster sit on the bench behind Luongo, so him being a backup should be out of the question.
108 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1) Kesler is matured through the tutelage of Sundin.
2) We would love to see Schneider’s value increase by giving him more NHL experience, and we don’t trust Raycroft the distance we could throw a barn.
You guys think too alike.
The koolaid tastes good my friend.
Raycroft is scary as hell….he has to shit the bed in preseason or people will begin to think he can actually play.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on Sep 19, 2009 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions
The words of someone who’s been hurt too much before.
by thelastjohnny on Sep 19, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions
It’s the tie that binds
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on Sep 19, 2009 8:22 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Make me puke
all these roses of responsibility for Kesler’s play laid at a career loser like Souptin’s feet.
The only thing that guy taught anyone last year was how to be a primadonna, show up whenever he felt like it, out of shape, suck up a bunch of unearned glory and yet another far too fat paycheque for what he brought, as he’s done his whole career. His brand of “leadership” is the last thing this team needs. The only thing he ever lead an NHL team to was the 1st tee.
I don’t really care what Kesler or Burrows do offensively, and I think they’ll do ok, what those two bring in all other areas of the game is what makes them valuable to any team. If Kes gets 2nd line minutes and quality linemates he’ll produce, and if he doesn’t, worse case scenario is we go back to having the best 3rd line in hockey again with he and Burr like the start of last season and the end of the one before (long before Souptin rode into town on his old grey mare).
Schneider should definitely be backup and play at least 20 games, then take it from there.
I only reserve that sort of anger for Mark Mess-up-the-Canucks-ier. Sundin was pretty inert as far as expensive-bald-free-agents go. I would still happily have him back on the team for a low price, as was discussed a bit a couple weeks ago.
by Beantown Canuck on Sep 19, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m glad you come here yoata, it’s fun disagreeing with you. The numbers with the RPM line don’t lie. I think time will inevitably tell just how valuable Sundin was for Kesler from a points perspective. I would hate to see him back on 3rd line duty. That shouldn’t be an option for him. He’s better than that.
So it’s basically torn. I see people saying things pro and con Sundin-Kesler. So project his points playing with Demitra and whoever else this coming season.
I’ll say somewhere between 50-55 points, with 60 being a tough thing for him to accomplish.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Inert
exactly, $6M cap hit worth of inert (and remember Gilisgan was begging to throw $10M x 2 years at him)
Only reason it pisses me off is the suggestion he was responsible for Kesler’s development.
$6M cap hit that would sit on the books and do nothing if Mats didn’t fill it. I don’t see that as a problem. But if it was one the books now and they couldn’t sign Sedins because of it… then I would agree with your point. But I see the Sundin experiment as no-harm no-foul. It didn’t hurt us, though it didn’t help as some hoped it would.
by Beantown Canuck on Sep 19, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't buy that either
It would have been spent and spent better if Gillisgan didn’t have such a hardon for Soup.
Bill Guerin would’ve been a great fit with the twins.
Bill Guerin would have cost youth or a draft pick in return. And I don’t think he was any better than Sundin! Guerin went from 36 points in 61 games prior to being traded, to 27 points in 41 games (reg season and playoffs) while PLAYING WITH SYDNEY GOD DAMN CROSBY. Mats got 36 points in 49 games with the Canucks, having NOT PLAYED 3/4 of a season to get into shape prior to that as Guerin had, and he instead played with Kesler, not Crosby, and “turned” Kesler from 0.5 point a game player into a point a game player for the final 1/3 of a season. And Kesler dissapeared in playoffs while Mats was 8 points in 8 games. So in my books, Mats was a way better decision than any Guerin hypothetical, that may not have even been possible.
by Beantown Canuck on Sep 19, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions
A conditional fifth rounder?
Big deal, imo Guerin would have been a bigger factor as he would complete the top line, and still would have left room to add another quality player or two.
Anyway just an example, still say Gillisgan’s fascination with Soup and subsequent overpayment and ineffectual mid-season parachuting cost the team other opportunities to improve.
But Gillis wasn’t looking for a vet winger. He wanted a kickass center!
I was actually hoping for him to land Recchi at the deadline to be honest.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions
That just makes him even more wrong imo
They had Hank, Kes, Wellwood, Demitra etc up the middle, but still nobody to finish for the twins. I agree Recchi would have been a great pickup but Guerin would have too, and was a lot cheaper iirc, but really they could have had both and still had cap space if not for Soup.
Fear…and hatred….those are paths to the dark side, yoata.
You are underestimating the value of Sundin…even if it did show itself later on. Burrows eventually clicked with the Sedins, and all was right in Canucksland. We had a bloody chance to go somewhere last year.
Kesler was fine playing Sundin’s wing. We landed the best available player during the season, and I would have paid the big bucks for him too.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not
underestimating anything, that was pure waste, and only his own apathy towards playing kept it from being a devastating contract for this team.
Well, if he had signed for 2 years…yeah, who knows what the hell would have happened to our current roster.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions
then you must have been turding yourself when Gillis said he was still pursuing him about a month ago :)
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions
A month ago?
he was saying it just a few days ago?
And I was shaking my head all over again…
Just imagine what this team looks like right now with that $10M albatross around our necks?
Sedins still here?
Luongo?
Probably the most moronic contract offer I’ve ever seen.
Yoata…you must open your eyes to the full majesty and power of the force…
It was a brilliant offer. Say it with me, it..was…an…offer!!!! (Shatnerian acting skills on full)
It was designed to get noticed. It did that. What did every report after say about Mats? it mentioned this huge offer.
As most in business know, an offer is sometimes just a starting point.
I thought when you minus the 8-10 games at the beginning, (his training camp. Now, to be clear, I agree wholeheartedly that the half season thing was unmitigated bullshit…)Sundin was a point a game player. He helped Kes and other youngins.
Thats good enough for me.
If he had SIGNED that offer I would be as pissed and illogical about Mats as you are. But I’ll take the word of all those that played and worked with him (unless they are ALL towing the company line) who praise his affect on them and their careers, over that irrationality.
Sorry Yoata…now…try that exercise where you hold up an X fighter and R2D2 up in the air again.
That was cool when you did that…
vancitydan
Dan, you have to disagree with me once in a while, haha. They’ll think we’re collaborating.
$10 million would just be killer to this current team to fit in. I don’t even know how Gillis would do it, and like you Yoata, I don’t know why he even offered Sundin 2 years at that price in the first place.
You see what he did with Matthieu Schneider’s contract though. He could do the same with Sundin. Tack on the incentives heavily.
I don’t care what anyone says. The more I think about it, the more we’ll wish that Sundin WAS on this team this year. Sundin makes players better…period.
I watched him for long time in Toronto, and seeing how he played with Gary Roberts, Jonas fricking Hoglund, Steve Thomas and others….they benefitted from playing with him. Oh, and I forgot Antropov and Ponikarovsky.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Why did he make that offer?
Maybe because he’s not the world’s greatest judge of ability and character???
Look at his big acquisitions so far, what have they done as Canucks? The guys that made this team and still do are the ones that were already in place when he came on board and disrespected them and the previous management that put them there.
first
my nickname has nothing to do with yoda.
Now as far as Soup, what he brought for what it cost the team was good enough for you???
And you complain about Demitra???
And you call me illogical… LOL
Funny how you won’t take Heatley’s teammate’s word for what he brought and his attitude was in the room and on the ice.
I think you’re confusing your bias for actual “logic”
And Souptin is easily one of the most overrated players of the last 20 years.
You remind me of a person who could turn “Liar Liar” into a depressing film.
Sure, Gillis inherited a good Canucks team with lots of cap space.
Yes, what Soup brought for that price was good enough for me. We had the dough, one addition was needed, the players didn’t want an overhaul but welcomed Sundin with open arms.
Don’t compare Sundin to Demitra because there isn’t a comparison. Sundin one of the most overated players? Oh geez. You really didn’t watch any Leafs games over that span did you?
You can’t underestimate Gillis’ former position as an agent and his great treatment of players to lure big name free agents here. That is something Nonis could not have done.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I believe...
…I mentioned something about Vancouver not having any actual “players”; they only have the Best Player in the Universe or Those Horrible Shitballs Sending us to Hell. I think I can see where Yoata falls regarding Sundin. 8)
I’ll defend Soup to the end of time. Been a fan for far too long to turn on him. Is he worth 8-10 million now? No. I have both biased and logical reasons to support my opinions. haha, eat it you Sundin-haters! I despise you! haha
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions
He was never worth that
That is elite player money, and the only thing Soup ever did that was comparable to the elite players in the game, was cashing his fat paycheques.
If he never played in the CotU he never would have been thought of any greater than Pierre Turgeon or Bernie Federko.
The only thing that guy taught anyone last year was how to be a primadonna, show up whenever he felt like it, out of shape, suck up a bunch of unearned glory and yet another far too fat paycheque for what he brought, as heās done his whole career. His brand of "leadership" is the last thing this team needs. The only thing he ever lead an NHL team to was the 1st tee.
[…]easily one of the most overrated players of the last 20 years.
Inert
Which is, of course, exactly how one describes the piss-poor Turgeon and Federko.
The frothy, raving hatred is what I’m most bemused by. I’m trying to figure out how he A) wasn’t criticized last year; or B) is the “most over-rated player in 20 years” (or at least one of them) if he has, as you say, never won a major award.
He got a bunch of press for his slow (in EVERY way) start last season on television, in the press and on the blogs. Was that a free ride?
There are several awards that are of the public-opinion, and surely he’d have gotten one of them if the public/media adored him so? Or was it some kind of reverse conspiracy keeping his votes down while still over-rating him?
Uh, no
what I’m talking about was the hype about him the entire time he was a leaf, being compared favourably with the elite players of the game, and paid as one of them despite never even contending for a major award, let alone winning one. Most of that overrating was done out of the CotU, so never enough to actually win him anything besides leaf nation adoration and those big paydays, but since they are the CotU, still enough to nauseate a good portion of the rest of the league’s fans, Gillis’ koolaid notwithstanding.
Overrating hm also extends imo to those being quite satisfied with what “he brought” to the team (aside from a 6 month circus) which would be laughable in terms of cap hit and distraction (not to mention opportunity cost) were his name anything but “Mats Sundin”.
OK
What did he ever accomplish individually or as a team in all his years in the NHL???
He was a good player but never the “great” he was made out to be by the CotU.
Individually he was one of the most consistent point producers, and he captained a Leaf team that got into the playoffs several times but never had the makeup or depth of a team that could make it to the big dance. He was a game breaker. He made players around him better. No, not much hardware accomplished, but the only one that mattered was the Cup. Not every great player gets that chance.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions
yawn
Can say that about a lot of players.
In all his years in the NHL was he ever even in the running for a major award, let alone win one?
In all his years in the NHL how many top 10 finishes in scoring did he have?
And yet he was paid amongst the very best in the league for years, despite never being one.
Like I said, if you play for the leaf, you will be hyped as great, whether you actually are or not, just ask Cuchoke and Bryan McPivot.
Ok ok, I’ll give you that….the salary part, comparitively. Pierre sTurgeon? My god. Bad comparison. Federko..hmmm.
Still though, judging by your Leaf hatred you didn’t watch a lot of their games.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
Joseph certainly didn’t build a reputation in St. Louis or Edmonton! Good lord, what nightmare years!
Of course, averaging a 2.40 (or so) GAA on the Leafs made for a totally unearned reputation, too.
Refer to the lousy defensive structures in Toronto and Edmonton.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Are we still talking about individual awards?
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions
He won the Mark Messier Leadership award! haha
Suck it!
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Shut up thursday! Don’t encourage Dark Cloud.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Messier did recommend Naslund, didn’t he? Oh boy. haha
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I think you need to leave this be. He just doesn’t like Leafs.
by thelastjohnny on Sep 20, 2009 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Nah…
* Currently holds the NHL record for most regular season overtime goals (15, shared with JaromĆr JĆ”gr, Sergei Fedorov and Patrik EliÔŔ)
* Ranked 20th all time in career goals (564) (Shared with Joe Nieuwendyk)
* Ranked 32nd all time in career assists (785)
* Ranked 25th all time in career points (1349)
* First European hockey player to be drafted first overall in the NHL Entry Draft (1989 by the Quebec Nordiques)
* Longest serving European captain of an NHL franchise in league history
* Only Swedish player to reach the 500 goal milestone
* Most career games, points, goals and assists by a Swedish hockey player
* Fastest overtime goal (6 seconds, tied with Alexander Ovechkin, Simon Gagne and David Legwand)
* Only Swedish player to reach 1000 points
Wiki
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 21, 2009 1:57 AM PDT up reply actions
The difference in the visions of Nonis and Gillis is like comparing the Fraser Valley to the Grand Canyon, in my opinion.
by Bobby Canuck on Sep 21, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Seems to me
Nonis’ vision included trading Floatuzzi for Luongo and promptly signing him long-term, matching the at-the-time silly offer-sheet for Kesler, signing Alex Burrows out of nowhere, signing Willie Mitchell, and drafting Alex Edler.
Meanwhile Gillisgan’s idea of vision is tying up $10M in cap space for 2 years for a 37 y/o that’s never won a damn thing.
So yeah like you said, vastly different in terms of vision…
Wow…lighten up dude. 1st…we are just having fun with you and the whole star wars thing…so relax on that.
Yes, he traded for Loungo, so what? He also traded for Eric Fucking Weinrich.
Willis Mitchell was a good signing, but you are nuts if you think he discovered Burrows. Wayne Heizinger did, and had to argue with Nonis to keep him at the beginning. Credit for Burr goes to Heizinger and no one else.
He picked Grabner and White as his back to back 1sts. Great huh Yoata? How about trading for Brian Smolinski, Steve McCarthy and Tommi Fucking Santala? Are any of those lighting it up with an NHL team?
Now, how about if we had Perron instead of White? Or Giroux instead of Grabner?
You are just being obstinate when others point out these facts to you.
A conversation is two way Yoata. Or are you just trying to show us all that only YOU know as much about the ’Nucks as we do. Yes, you make a point now and then.
But thats not the point here. The point here is to enjoy a conversation with other knowledgable hockey fans. yes, I have lost my temper too on occasion.
But you cannot just sit here and go…naaah…naaaah..naaah to everyone “I’m right and you are wrong”.
Unless you are like 12 years old. If that is the case…well…
carry on
vancitydan
You know what
turn that whole stinking pile of bs back on yourself.
And once and for all F-off with the personal comments.
It is you that is incapable of having a discussion without getting defensive and insulting, so take your inferiority complex and shove it.
And same goes for your points on Nonis, funny how you can’t give a GM credit for a signing that he ultimately made, (or even the Luongo steal for that matter) no matter how it came to be, and all you can do is slag the neg about him, but you can’t seem to find anything but glowing praise for Gillis who has yet to contribute anything of significant value of his own to this team (at least until we see what his draft picks have done)
And I’m not ready to give up on Grabner yet either, but I’m sure your patience will be equally short for Gillis’ picks?
And btw, I’m perfectly relaxed about all things here, including the starwars thing, I was just pointing it out to you that my nick is not a spelling mistake, and who is “we” you are the only one I’ve seen make mention of it?
Seems to me you are the one that needs to relax since me merely stating some facts about Nonis vs Gillis turns you into 12 y/o mouthy punk.
One personal comment in that whole post you douche. I called you 12…and what did you do…come back and say fuck off and act like a twelve year old.
Kind of proved my point. If anyone has an inferiority complex it is you my friend. I am quite confident.
Then again, I am going to be the writer for a new website…fanhuddle.com.
Maybe they missed all your stylish and provocative comments when they were looking for someone …
Must be nice to never be wrong.
And watch your mouth. I have no problem with backing up my comments, but it seems anyone that challenges you on this subject gets this massive amount of hatred. Sundin beat up your kid or something? Refuse to give you an autograph?
Grow up son.
vancitydan
LOL
“I am going to be the writer for a new website”.
Yeah, that just reeks of self-confidence and not the least bit defensive or indicative of an inferiority complex. lol
Half that post is personal comments aimed at me, as usual, I post about hockey and you post about me, yeah I’m the one with the problem.
Like I said before take your own advice pops, you don’t back up jack, all you do is spew personal rhetoric when you can’t stand an opposing opinion.
So if you don’t like it getting sent right back in your face I suggest you either cut the personal crap and talk hockey, or don’t bother posting anything in my direction.
really?
You are funny. I think I will keep this going until this thread is as thin as they get.
Read the start of this whole thing. Sound out the big words, or get someone to help you.
I made one analysis at the beginning of it, and then sat back and watched the Sean/Yoata show.
You got increasingly insulting to him, or his opinion. Got news for you son, its the same thing in this context.
I then jumped in and pointed out that it was getting childish. I called you a 12 year old and said you were being obstinate.
And THAT is a personal attack for you. Worthy of such vitriol?
I changed my mind…talking to you maturely got Sean no where. he left. Trying the same, and then hoping to cajole you into changing got me called inferior and told to fuck off…etc…etc…
So, all I can do is ignore you, and suggest you get some help. An anger management therapist or something.
Because if calling you a 12 year old and obstinate is attacking you personally, there is no hope for you.
Have fun…I am sure in your own mind you are right…
I am laughing my ass off at you, and your sometimes cogent opinions on the team are now reduced to something less do to an inability to comprehend the English language and a very short fuse.
Seriously, get help, you go through life with that much hate and you will get a heart attack.
Relax dude…it’ll help you be less of a douche.
But hey, come back with more attacks…cuz you are funny.
I’ll give you that…
vancitydan
LMAO
Because if calling you a 12 year old and obstinate is attacking you personally, there is no hope for you.
yeah, you’re right, those are very flattering comments that I must’ve taken the wrong way. Wow.
Like I said, look back at every issue we’ve had, they all start with me talking hockey and you, being unable to cope with a differing opinion, resporting to personal comments about me instead.
Just drop the personal rhetoric, is this a hockeyboard or danny’s psychobabble.com?
Well, you give yourself too much credit. That is the only thing I said. Every issue I have had with you, and there have only been a couple. You don’t listen.
Thats childish, and I called you on it.
Because mostly I can tell you may have played, and have some knowledge of the game…there is just no point in disagreeing with you, is there?
Are you EVER wrong? Maybe those of us that think Sundin was a good player for the Canucks last year know what we are talking about too.
I said in the first post that you make some good points.
Sigh
OK Yoata…this whole thing is silly.
You are being silly. And sensitive. But yes, lets keep it to hockey…
Have a nice day.
vancitydan
Yeah
Somehow I’m going to have to believe it when I see it. Especially since you managed to insult me again about a half a dozen times in that post.
Man, I don’t know if I’ve ever encountered someone so ironically oblivious to their own insulting attitude towards someone else while at the same time taking issue with that person’s supposed (but actually nonexistent) insults.
You don’t agree with me, fine, you don’t like how I make my points? TFB! I do so with facts and logic and could care less if your ego is too fragile to handle it. That doesn’t give you the right to start making ignorant and insulting comments about me personally.
But if you do somehow manage to be able to keep it to hockey, I don’t see any future problems, which is certainly preferable to me, but that’s up to you.
Don’t you understand son?
You’ve been dismissed.
I am done with you.
I have neither the time nor the inclination to talk anything with you.
Now…go away …I have no desire to even talk hockey with you…because you are a whiner and a “victim” that finds an insult in ANY word.
vancitydan
LOL
Just as I figured.
Your “attempt” at “talking hockey” sure lasted long.
Talk about giving yourself too much credit.
You are truly a sad pathetic little man, enjoy your 15 minutes at fanpuddle.com, with you as “writer” my guess is that’s about how long it will last, but at least your ego will get a much needed stroke so you won’t take it so personally when someone has a different opinion than you and can actually support why they do.
TTFN skippy
I think they’re breaking the SBN template. Haha.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on Sep 22, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions
So, punk…do you not read? Or just the stuff you like?
I am done with you because you don’t believe anyone is as smart as you.
Talking hockey with you is a losing proposition, so I stopped. It wasn’t talking, it was you telling everyone that disagrees about Sundin and Gillis that we are wrong.
Got news for you punk, the majority of people in the city believe that Gillis is doing a good job. A slimer majority, but still majority, think Sundin was a good move. Guess the whole fucking Lower Mainland is wrong, and some pathetic little weasel that isn’t man enough to even use his real name is right?
Those are facts littel boy, from surveys on Sportsnet and in the paper. Facts. you know what those are right?
Idiot.
BTW…read this thread again. The only sad, inferior, insecure person here is you.
There are more “personal” insults here by you than anyone else.
All I told you originally is to grow up.
The rest is on you little man…maybe you can use this as a growing experience.
No one attacked you, no one insulted you, or anything else there Mr Victim. Not until you started this sad, timewasting diatribe.
If you were any kind of a man, you would realize that.
But, thats it…respond all you want from here…like I told you…you have been dismissed by your better.
I won’t be even reading it, so…assuage your poor little ego some more.
If that isn’t clear enough for you, than too bad.
I have no problem with differing opinions. I do have a problem with egotistical idiots that only believe the sound of their own voice.
Don’t approach me again punk. My time is too important to educate an obvious child in life.
Just remember, I said nothing I wouldn’t say to your face…while you have been judging and labellng me the last several posts.
You would not do that in person, I am sure.
Typical internet tough guy…you make me laugh.
vancitydan
LMAO again.
First, you need to look up the definition of the word “fact”.
Second, I believe this is the 3rd time you’ve said you were “done”, please let it be true this time, and not just another example of your hypocrisy. Just like calling me an internet tough guy when you are just that yourself, LOL!
Third, I could care less how many people disagree with me, I still have the right to my own opinion without being personally disparaged for it.
And last, I’ve never approched you, it is you who have taken issue with my stances on subjects and done so in nothing but ignorant terms, so yet again, take your own advice.
Everyone is entitled to their hockey opinions here. I find yoata to be completely sure of his opinions and self and he does back them up with stats and facts. A bit arrogant-sounding? M’eh perhaps. But I enjoy the hockey argument.
I’m also completely willing to accept other people’s opinions as possibilities. Like “Sundin is overrated”. ….that’s yoata’s opinion and I respect that. I still disagree on most fronts…but I argued it out, had fun with it and then gave up. We agree to disagree.
We are all armchair GM’s here. Let’s try to get along. We have a long year ahead of us.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 22, 2009 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions
That's fair Sean
I don’t mean to sound arrogant, but I think my sarcasm and facetious tone can be taken the wrong way, appreciate that you get it though and I agree, we both stated our case and agreed to disagree, can’t ask for more than that.
I too enjoy a good debate, as long as it’s kept civil and on topic, hope to have a few more with you as the season goes.
Cheers!
haha!
That or Holyfield-Foreman. God that sucked.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 23, 2009 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Hey Yoata, I know this author is a jagoff, but here’s a good fit for the Twins.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 20, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Absolutely.
but didn’t he just re-up in Florida?
Would take a big salary dump and probably the loss of some quality young talent as well, but yeah that kid’s a horse.
I think that crappy thing going against you guys right now is the fact that goaltending depth in the league is so high right now after the elite guys (bobbylu, kipper, king henrik, the fat guy in NJ, etc) that it may be hard to find a dance partner to swap with. Any league that sees Biron go to the Islanders to be a backup (maybe even 3rd string is DiPietro gets his life together) obviously proves this fact as true. On the other hand, Schneider is young, and imagine what a team like Philadelphia would do to get their hands on a stud goalie after all these brutal years of a solid team backstopped by the likes of Esche, Cechmanek, Snow, etc (would they consider trading Van Riemsdyk for him???), San Jose if Nabakov has a bad year and they decide not to resign him this summer as a UFA, maybe LA for one of their many young guys if Quick/Ersberg sucks, or maybe even St Louis or Detroit (both have a cupboard stocked with solid young players) if Mason and Howard/Osgood don’t inspire any confidence… I’m a flames fan so I “hate you guys” (cartman voice) and blah blah blah, but I will be keeping my eye on the Schneider situation for sure.
by Dustin Timberlake on Sep 19, 2009 11:12 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I think that Schneider should get something back. I see him as getting packaged with some of the D’ depth, or some of the forward depth, depending which Gillis decides to trade for and what the other team wants.
Or one of each and the best young goalie not in the NHL. That should bring back a top 6 forward that can play now.
Our Flames friend brought up a couple of spots. Chicago also has questions at backup…both their guys are not in Schneid’s league.
I think Schneider could go somewhere that has a good but not great #1. And take their spot. He will be a #1 somewhere.
I think Phx with Raymond and a third for Doan. He is in the last year of his deal anyhow.
He deserves something for being such a good soldier in that hellhole in the desert.
vancitydan
The fact he's in his last year
makes that way too much for him imo, no guarantees he re-ups and then you lose all that for 1 year?
I think the deals that were out there that you’d give up those kinds of young assets for were Heatley and Kessel, now I think it’s a waiting game to see not only where the biggest holes are in our lineup, but where they will pop up around the league as the deadline approches and the contenders get sorted from the pretenders.
Yoata…I have a hard on for Doan. I have always thought he would be a huge star if he played in Canada, or even one of the US glamour franchises. He gets forgotten in the desert.
Whatever the deal is, it looks like the ’Nucks are in a position of strength from which to deal from.
vancitydan
I like Doan too
I just wouldn’t sell the farm for 1 year of him under contract, there are very few players I think are worth that price as a rental.
Yes, but you really only make the deal if you know you can sign him to another contract…you know, one of those kind of deals…sort of like Kessel signing a 5 year deal within seconds of the trade being consummated.
vancitydan
Different situation
as an RFA he can accept offer sheets, you can’t negotiate with a player under contract with another team, so like I said, no guarantees he won’t test UFA status and go for the $.
Hodgeson Comment and Question
I hope Cody Hodgeson has a great game tonight but realistically I doubt that he will. That back problem was fairly serious so his legs and hands will not be there tonight. I doubt that we will get to see the real Cody Hodgeson this preseason.
What will AV and Gillis do? Is it fair to say Yanick Hansen to keep Cody around if he does not earn the roster spot? Can the Canucks send him back to major junior for conditioning? What are the options are if Canucks decide not to give Cody a roster spot based on a poor preseason performance?
Back to Brampton for a year is the option.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions
It is a tough call, unless a trade happens to make room for him.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
At this point I have no idea at all. I would guess that Grabner and Hodgson don’t make it and someone like OBrien gets traded.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 19, 2009 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m still thinking SOB’s on the block. though I also think he’s much improved this pre-season. Salo should be shopped, too, though that may not happen until later in the year (if he’s not breathing through broken ribs at that point).
If Demitra goes, it’ll be a team doing us a favour, and that could hurt scoring. The better Shirokov looks, the more likely this is.
Schneider? My pick of destinations is Dallas. If Turco starts weak, they’re going to be looking. The ownership fiasco there has nothing to do with the Stars being a supposedly weak franchise: if the owner has to sell, he’ll find a buyer who will leave them in Texas.
Man, I hate working until 9:00 PM on Friday and Saturday nights!
"Man, I hate working until 9:00 PM on Friday and Saturday nights!"
Who else is going to run the Bingo Hall, Thursday?
‘Chin up through adversity’ as Ryan Walters would say.
And then RW would do 100 push-ups, an intro for a seminar on “Perkiness”,
run 10 miles uphill, wrassle’ a grizzly bear and stop off at White Spot for a modest dinner.
yoata,
Sundin didn’t grab the 2/20 offer from Gillis when it was just sitting there for the grabbing. That’s was all the proof of character I ever needed right there. A lesser man – e.g. Yashin – wouldda been all over it. So there’s no worries about Sundin’s character, at least not from me.
As for his hip and, in general, his ability to perform in the future, at a reduced rate ($2.5m?) he’d be a fine addition.
I’m very glad the 2/20 didn’t come to pass, tho I have to wonder if it quietly, unreportedly, came with a gentleman’s agreement – cuz Gillis is no dummy – that Sundin would quit after one year if his play wasn’t up to snuff. That way, the only risk would have been to the owners’ pocketbook for a year, and the Vanc owners seem to be OK with that; they appear to just want a winner and are OK with the financial risk in getting there.
Regardless
that offer is not at all flattering to Gillis in terms of his ability to either judge value, or manage the cap.
Regardless? No, not at all regardless if you consider the final paragraph in the comment that you were replying to. Quite the opposite.
To recap: If Gillis and Sundin also had a verbal understanding, then, based on Sundin’s subsequent actions, Gillis judged Sundin’s character quite correctly.
As for Sundin’s remaining hockey ability, I repeat: it’s only the owners’ money. Provided Gillis trusted Sundin not to abuse the offer, then the offer itself was a “safe risk,” with no danger to the Canucks’ future cap space if Sundin didn;t work out. The team had room to give at that point so Gillis simply grabbed the best free agent he could find, secure (based on my premise) in the knowledge that if it didn’t pan out, Sundin would just retire and restore the cap space to the team.
The real story here is, I think, the owners. They have now backed a number of moves under Gillis – Sundin & Luongo for example, maybe Demitra too – where they have shown a complete willingness to spend their dough in order to improve the team, all while letting Gillis “game the system” in his cap management.
Not every team is so fortunate. The owners are committed to winning and they clearly trust Gillis to place their bets. In a down economy … and in general in the NHL over the years … that puts them in a minority. Usually, as the old saying goes, “hockey must be a hell of a game to survive the men who run it.” Our team is living thru the opposite at the moment. Nice, eh?
Well that's a huge if
And pure speculation.
But what if Soup put up his usual 70 pts, or even 80 or 90?
Then what happens to the Nucks this season with that $10M on board???
A: No more Sedins, then likely no more Luongo…
It was a brutal brutal offer, never on his best day was he a $10M player, you realize that’s more than any player in the league makes? Crosby, AO, Malkin, Datsyuk, Lidstrom, etc… you know, the real elite players in the game…
Sure it’s speculation, but reasonable spec nonetheless. Given that Mats has already proven that he wasn’t just trolling for dollars, a la Yashin, then all that’s needed for the spec to be probable is to surmise that Gillis had correctly judged Mats’ character beforehand; the rest follows naturally.
It’s also fully consistent w/Gillis’ cap gaming techniques and w/the owners’ willingness to place million dollar bets in the hopes of a cup. Methinks there was a solid backstory to the whole affair that never made the press; the conventional explanations are, in light of what we we know about the people involved and how they work, too simplistic. They can make us feel superior about our own judgment-in-comparison, which is probably why they’re popular, but that doesn’t make them true.
Oh, and as for salary comparisons … I repeat: it’s only money. The owners have shown that they don’t mind spending the bucks to try for a cup. The only way it backfires, apparently, is if it messes up the cap, but if they had a verbal agreement with Mats that they were confident would avoid that, then that issue would have been no issue at all.
There is simply no way Gillis made this offer – or the Luongo deal, for that matter – without clearing it first with the owners. More than that, he probably worked hand-in-glove with them all along on both deals. And I suspect he’s done the same w/Demitra, too, cuz the owners are still signing his checks.
I would love to meet the owners, actually. It’s easy for us to sit back and analyze dispassionately, but it’s a lot different when you bet your own money, as they have been doing. Interesting folk, no? And talk about a game within a game!
It's not only money,
Again, if Soup were to have signed that deal and then played to expectations, what grounds would Gillis have to cancel the 2nd year? None, in which case bye bye Sedins, and likely bye bye Luongo.
Soup sure didn’t do the leaf any favours when he wouldn’t accept a trade for them to restock the shelves even just to be a rental despite no playoff hopes for them that year. (Something about needing to be a part of things from training camp on and how guys that join a team late in a season aren’t as much a part of the team, cough cough) so I would never count on him doing any for the Nucks either, seems to me his history is a deal’s a deal till death do us part…
So I disagree that it’s reasonable speculation, it’s pure speculation, nothing more.
I could care less what any of it has to do with the owners, completely irrelevant to what I’m talking about.
yoata I have to say that I can see why some people don’t like trying to debate with you on this site. Having read through the tedium that was the last 479 posts I will say that you do sometimes come across in a certain way that maybe you don’t intend to come across. Lines like, “I could care less…” certainly do make you sound arrogant. But that’s now why I am writing this because I don’t have any problem with you or with how you write your posts. I can just see where some of the disagreements stem from. What I am wondering yoata is if you could explain why you are so willing to hate on Gillis for an offer that he made that never got signed. Why are you so willing to throw Gillis under the bus for an IF? That deal you are seem so hung up on was never signed. It never affected the Canucks and Gillis has handled the cap fairly well all things considered. I guess I just don’t see why you take that IF so seriously yet don’t seem to care about all of the real failures that Nonis was involved in. You seem to dismiss Gillis because the Sedin’s and Luongo were already here but you have to admit getting them all resigned for a cap hit of around 18 million a year long term is pretty damn good business. Trading away too draft busts for a couple of NHL caliber defencemen is good business. The drafting of Cody Hodgson seems to have been a vast improvement on the drafting of Grabby and White. I mean on the balance of the moves he has made so far you have to admit that he is doing a better job than Nonis was doing. It might go pear shaped from here but in terms of what has been done so far there really isn’t much of an argument to be made. And as for Sundin you have to admit that he had a good playoff, better than most of the Canucks, was on a pretty good second line and played some part in Kesler’s break out second half. I mean those aren’t statements that are overly controversial are they? Am I seeing this wrongly?
by Section 312 on Sep 23, 2009 4:07 PM PDT reply actions
Well, in Yoata’s defence, was Sundin worth the $10 million equivalent we paid him? It wasn’t. But personally I don’t care because he got Sundin here and we had the cap space. Is Yoata correct that we could have used that 10 million on two – 5 million guys who would have been more effective? Perhaps.
I don’t knock Nonis all that much. He did rape Mike Keenan for Luongo, after all. That was the deal of the decade for sure.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 23, 2009 5:25 PM PDT up reply actions
First of all I found it funny you called Sundin an “it”
I am not saying Nonis didn’t do some good things. I just said that on the balance of what he did and what Gillis has done so far then Gillis has done a better job. The thing about the Luongo trade is that any one of us would have made that trade. I say that because it was clear that Luongo wasn’t close to a deal with the Panthers and so any GM worth his salt must have been calling to see if he was available. And we luckily had a piece that Keenan coveted more than anyone not named Burke. So while it was a legendary trade and a wonderful example of getting ripped off AND Nonis deserves credit for making it happen I really don’t think it should be glorified as much as it has been. I mean no one knows the name of the GM who traded for Babe Ruth. The biggest rip off trade of all time in any sport.
The question is where do those two 5 million dollar players come from? Do they both play with Demitra and if so does Kesler develop into the player we have now? Maybe we don’t have Hodgson anymore cause we had to trade him to get these 5 million dollar players. We gave up nothing and got a guy who helped balance out our scoring. We won the division and he was good in the playoffs. And again we gave up nothing. My whole point here with yoata is that I am interested why he is so insistent on dealing with the hypothetical when talking about Gillis and that contract. We will never know what would have happened with the Sedin’s and Luongo if Sundin had signed the 2 year deal. I just don’t get how you can question Gillis over a contract offer that no one ever signed. Seems a little presumptive to me.
by Section 312 on Sep 23, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions
It is presumptive in a sense. But Gillis DID offer 2 years. What if Sundin said yes? I would presume that the Sedins and/or Luongo wouldn’t get those contracts. But who knows, really? He could have tacked on incentives to the deal taking a smaller cap hit…blah blah. There’s too many what if scenarios to that story, so I see your point as well.
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 23, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I mean listen, if Sundin signs a 2 year deal and Luongo won’t resign and the Sedin’s had walked I am sure I would have been organizing a lynching mob to head over to Gillis’ house. But that didn’t happen so why hold that against him? That’s my point in a nut shell.
by Section 312 on Sep 23, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions
But your point is arguable. Gillis offered it. No it didn’t happen, but you have to question his brain capacity on that one, right? Then again…I trust Gillis 100%, but I’m just sayin’
by Sean Zandberg on Sep 23, 2009 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Without knowing all the facts about the discussions Gillis had with the agent I have no idea about how much brain power was involved. And it didn’t happen so maybe it was never really an offer that they were willing to follow through on. Cause he would have signed it wouldn’t he? I don’t know. But everyone makes mistakes and a deal that was offered that wasn’t signed isn’t something I am too worried about. He doesn’t seem to have made too many mistakes other than that. I don’t even necessarily disagree with some of what yoata is saying I am just wondering why he takes that deal and all the IFs that surround it so seriously.
by Section 312 on Sep 23, 2009 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions

by 



















