Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Picking Up The Pieces (Part III: The Defense)

Now that it's been a month since the Canucks were eliminated, I think I can finally take a look at the defense from last year. Not sure why I struggled with this one for so long.

No wait, yes I do. I was under the impression that Vancouver's strength was in net and on defense. So were we all just duped or did Chicago show that the Canucks strength on the blueline needs a bit of tweaking?

I don't have the answer, you'll have to ask the other Mike. But let's take a look at the defense anyway.

 

Star-divide

 

And keep in mind we're ignoring Ohlund because we already covered him and it's sounding increasingly unlikely we'll be seeing him in the Orca again.

On with the show...


Alexander Edler

#23 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-3

220

Apr 21, 1986



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Alexander Edler 80 10 27 37 11 54 5 0 1 0 145 6.9

Status: Signed through 2013, UFA afterwards

Can you say cornerstone? Edler had a career year across the board (goals, points, assists, +/-, PIMs, PPGs, PPAs) and very much made Gillis look like a genius when he inked him to a four year extension at the beginning of the year. Edler did have some rough moments this year (in particular his defensive zone positioning at times made you want to gouge your eyes out with a spork), but considering this is just his third year, it can be forgiven.

You know what wasn't expected? For Edler to tied for third in post season points with Sundin. Money. With Ohlund likely on the way out, Edler is in line for a big season in a few months.

 

 


Sami Salo

#6 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-3

215

Sep 02, 1974



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Sami Salo 60 5 20 25 5 26 5 0 2 0 110 4.5

Status: Signed through 2011, UFA afterwards

As you know, Salo's story is typically one of "Sweet christ how many injuries did he have this time?" and, yet again, he didn't disappoint: at least four games out due to the groin, then a couple games with something "undisclosed", then his groin again, then 15 games with a broken rib and finally three games missed in the two rounds of post season play.

Salo did have a strong post season, posting three goals (two game winners) and seven points in just seven games. But his regular season was mediocre at best: he appeared in 60 games which was the second worst of his six seasons as a Canuck (he appeared in only 59 games in 05-06). All five of his goals were power play tallies this year, but ending with 25 points is still too low for a guy that's being paid $3.7 million a year.

You may note a subtle bit of negativity in my review. Good on ya. I'm sure Salo is the salt of the earth, the type of guy you want your daughter marrying. But who cares. Personally, Salo's high risk/high reward has grown ineffective over these years and, with Ohlund gone, he's one of the best tradeable assets on the blueline this team has. If Gillis can do swing it, it's time to ask Salo to waive his NTC and move him. If not, and Salo sticks around, so be it but except another season of injuries and mixed results.

 

 


Willie Mitchell

#8 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-3

210

Apr 23, 1977



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Willie Mitchell 82 3 20 23 29 59 0 0 1 0 88 3.4

Status: Signed through 2010, UFA afterwards

Mitchell's post season shouldn't overshadow his regular season success. Let's start with the latter: career highs across the board, including the first season in which the Big Willie machine showed up in all 82 games, tied his career high in goals, crushed his previous high in assists, had a career best in shots on net (88), lead all Canuck defensemen in TOI, and just for good measure, his stellar plus/minus that ranked him fourth best amongst blueliners at the end of the season.

Regrettably, Mitchell followed this up with a questionable post season. He took 12 PIMs in the first round alone (one putting his team into a 5-on-3 hole) and, if it wasn't for game four, would have ended the post season with no points. He would end the playoffs with 22 PIMs which, if you consider he only had 12 PIMs in 12 post season games two years ago, isn't spectacular. In the Chicago series he made a number of unfortunate passes and clearing attempts and was frequently caught letting the Hawk forwards get under his skin.

As he moves into his contract year, Mitchell will have to put that post season effort behind him and find that regular season success again. I don't see him leaving the Canucks (something about the 'home town boy makes good' angle is too much to pass up). I expect Gillis will get an extension in front of him before the season gets too far underway because he's still one of the best in the business and his leadership will be monumental again.

(You know, much like his stick.)

 

 


Kevin Bieksa

#3 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-0

205

Jun 16, 1981



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Kevin Bieksa 72 11 32 43 -4 97 5 0 2 2 153 7.2

Status: Signed through 2011, UFA afterwards


For a guy who had a terrible 2007-08, Mr. Bowling Green really rebounded this year, having a career year in points (led all Vancouver blueliners in points in fact) and second on the team in power play assists. He finished with more points then Kuba, Kubina, Bouwmeester and Barker for that matter. Not bad for a guy who missed almost ten games with a broken foot.

Sadly he couldn't follow up his regular season with a stellar playoffs. He only netted five points in 10 games, none of which were goals, and only two were on the power play. He also went to the box seven times. Sigh.

All of that aside, there's a reason why you heard Bieksa's name last year (in rumored trades for Brad Richards) and again this year (for the aforementioned Bouwmeester): he's a defenseman you want to have. Yes he has to work on his composure but there aren't too many top four guys out on the cheaper side ($3.5 million) who can log a ton of minutes, score, fight and play responsibly (mostly!) in their own end. 

Much like Edler, I see Ohlund's departure helping Bieksa too. He has a chance to elevate his game in terms of both scoring and leadership. Let's just hope he stays healthy enough to do both.

 

 

 


Shane O`Brien

#55 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-3

224

Aug 09, 1983



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Shane O`Brien 77 0 10 10 5 196 0 0 0 0 39 0.0

Status: RFA

Was there ever a more appropriate set of initials for a defenseman? Acquired from Tampa for Krajicek (and spare parts Ouellet and Simek were swapped too) he was supposed to bring more size and muscle then his predecessor. So if you count nine fights (third highest on the team), a team and career high 196 PIMs (which lead all defensemen in the regular season), second highest PIMs (24) on the team in the playoffs, and at least two separate occasions landing himself in Vigneault's dog house and bitching about it to the media a wild success, then you're clearly a SOB fan.

Then there was this play back in March.

To be fair, he did get somewhat better when Vigneault paired him with Bieksa. But his eager willingness to take penalties was aggravating for (I suspect) the coach and fans alike. During the January meltdown he was taking at least one call per game. Hell he had 18 PIMs in the Chicago series alone. The frequency is totally unacceptable. If he can't find the line, thenhow do you accurately gauge his value when he's constantly putting his team in jeopardy?

It's probable Gillis with qualify him and keep him around next year. But the coaching staff with have their hands full trying to teach the SOB some discipline.

(And don't ask me why there's no SBN pic for O'Brien. But the replacement is just perfect.)

 

 


Ossi Vaananen

#5 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-4

215

Aug 18, 1980



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Ossi Vaananen 49 1 10 11 8 22 0 0 0 0 20 5.0

Status: UFA

Ossi, Ossi, Ossi. Stolen off waivers when the Flyers have to make room for Briere, Ossi only suited up for three games in the regular season for Vancouver and three in the playoffs. He did have an assist in the first period of his first Canuck game, but his overall production was minimal. Then again, he's very much a defensive defenseman in the clone of Mitchell so we should probably be happy with a single point.

So, with Ohlund seeking employment elsewhere, does Gillis give Ossi a slight raise on his $1,000,000 contract and keep him? I'd think so; what's to lose? Unless Gillis needs all the coin he can to stack the forwards ranks, we could do far worse for a bottom four defenseman.

 


Rob Davison

#4 / Defenseman / Vancouver Canucks

6-3

220

May 01, 1980



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG GTG SOG PCT
2008 - Rob Davison 23 0 2 2 -4 51 0 0 0 0 15 0.0

Status: UFA

Davison only appeared in 23 games, a far cry from his career high of 69 with San Jose four seasons ago. Despite the limited time, his 51 PIMs were 10th highest on the team and his -4 was the worst for his career. The last time he suited up was in early February with Vigneault opting to use Vaananen as the prefered blueliner replacement.

Not sure what Gillis truly saw in his former client when he brought him in, but he and Vigneault likely know now that Davison is a reserve defenseman at best (it may just be easier to call him a reserve enforcer).I wouldn't expect him to return, probably giving that slot to McIver or Fitzgerald from the Moose instead.

He does, however, have a kick ass profile picture above. For that we should salute him (and for hits like this one).

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Davison licking the boogers out of his nose. Nice.

If Gillis does not get a high calibre d-man, then yeah I agree, Bieksa should thrive in Ohlund’s absence

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 8, 2009 1:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Also

..If you accept some of the current draft rankings out there, the best guy at the 22nd slot could be David Rundblad, a 6’2’’ Swedish defenseman (as if he’d be another ethnicity?)

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Jun 8, 2009 1:49 PM PDT reply actions  

i’m still pretty in love with our defense. Big Slick Willie really didn’t get enough credit for his incredible regular season (it’s not a stretch to say he was one of the five best defensemen at playing defense this year), and is young enough to keep it going awhile. Edler deserves the love, and I think Vaananen is a great great sixth d-man. You’re right about Biexxxa too; he should have a great year if for no other reason than he’s in his late 20s.

I’d really like to see the Canucks go after Paul Mara, who’s very defensively sound and has been a god on the PK the last two years. Rob Scuderi would also be an incredible pick-up. I don’t know how people around the league value those guys, but I really like what they’ve done this year. Komisarek would also be nice, of course, but he’s probably too expensive for our tastes.

I’d love to land Rundblad, just because of the name.

by passive_voice on Jun 8, 2009 2:58 PM PDT reply actions  

I’d take Komisarek. Is he really going to get that much more than Scuderi. I suppose. But he’d be cheaper than Jaybo.
Watching the Moose….there isn’t really any d-man we can use there. At least, they aren’t impressing me all that much, or are not our property

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 8, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Canucks defense is NOT that great. Team defense is, yes, but the blue line lacks a clear cut leader (at least with Salo so often injured they do) and while Willie can shut down guys fairly well, there just isn’t a lot of talent on the blue line for the Canucks. Especially with Ohlund walking this summer. There needs to be at least 2 signings – one for a defenseman to QB the power play and one for a good, all-around defenseman. Komisarek would be fine, I suppose, but who would you play him with? Mitchell? Mitchell’s a better shut down D than Komisarek and Komisarek will be commanding quite the hefty price tag, it seems. Aside from Bouwmeester I don’t know who’s really available to help out, but I feel some major upgrades are needed.

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Jun 8, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

OK, but the ting is, I thought Edler and Bieksa CAN be the go-to d-men. Yet that remains up in the air, sort of. Bieksa could put up 50 points as the #1 guy.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 8, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Funny thing is I never thought of Salo as the clear cut anything other than the best shot from the point (and Edler and Bieksa are chipping away at that). But I do agree some new blood is in there and I’d much rather prefer money spent on the QB then another shut down guy. That’s why I think keeping Ossi around for a low price is fine. Nothing fancy just get the job done.

But a top four that includes Edler, Mitchell and Bieksa I think is better than a lot of what some teams roll out. One more offensive minded guy and I’ll rest easier at night.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Jun 8, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Salo wasn’t hurt so often he’d be our #1 guy. It’s unfortunate a strong wind gives him a fucking hernia.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 8, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that you are completely wrong with your comments. The Canucks have a deep backend, and they are talented and young. Edler put up 37 points in his 3rd season, Bieksa cracked 40 pts. Look ,around the league and find me a team that has a deeper, talented defence than Vancouver. There aren’t many.
Adding 2 quality defence is stupid, if we don’t go Jay-bo, then sign Vaananen and whoever and go for scoring. Maybe Gaborik…

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Canucks have 6 NHL defensemen. None on the AHL that can step in. Davidson can’t even crack the line up. They are anything but deep.

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Jun 9, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Look ,around the league and find me a team that has a deeper, talented defence than Vancouver. There aren’t many.

oooh I like challenges. Tell me, what do you mean by many just so I know how many teams I can name.

A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Toronto sports fans, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.

by furcifer on Jun 9, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’ll go with these for now.

Detroit, San Jose, Anaheim, Dallas, Philadelphia, Boston, Calgary.

A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Toronto sports fans, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.

by furcifer on Jun 9, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

What? Dallas, Anaheim, Philly, Boston, Calgary???? Are you on crack? Oh wait, you’re a leafs fan. Of course you are.
I assume that you don’t know much about hockey. Detroit and San Jose are above us in depth, the other teams are going downhill fast or are already there. And Boston is the team that overperformed, and it showed in the playoffs. Without Chara, they have nothing. Same goes for Anaheim with an albeit rapidly declining Pronger. And don’t even mention Calgary. Reghyr is a heck of a defenceman, but after him the cupboards bare. Unless you subscribe to the Pierre Macguire Phaneuf fanclub.
A team that rolls out Mitchell, Salo, Edler, Bieksa and a yet to be named 5th dman is right in the top 5 for defensive strength and mix. Shaner and Vaananen slottin into the 6th spot makes us deepest in the NW by a country mile.
If Neidermayer signs, it makes us ridiculously good.

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anaheim WITH Niedermayer is much better than our D. San Jose is a no-brainer. I like the Stars’ D as well. Nuckels, why don’t you make a valid argument in the Fan Post section and I’ll post it on the front page. It’s a good conversation.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 9, 2009 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Boston, San Jose, Dallas…
we are pretty good on D though no doubt.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 9, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’d say decent. Contrary to what Nuckels says there are much deeper, more talented defense groups out there.

A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Toronto sports fans, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.

by furcifer on Jun 9, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Give me names, i’m up for a debate.

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Make a post about it in the Fan Post area and I’ll put it on the front page. It is a great debate.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 9, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aw man, I don’t wanna work. I just wanna sit around and enjoy this delicious Budlight lime. I prefer to just pick at other peoples posts. :) Maybe later on, i’m headin away for a week of fishin and cruisin.

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 8:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Francois Beauchemin UFA:

Will get a raise on his $2 million salary despite an injury-plagued year, only 29 with a Cup ring to boot, hell of a glue guy as he showed the past few years.
He also beat the snot out of the Sharks and Tomas Kopecky on the WIngs recently.
If we can’t drum up a young gem from someone else’s stockpile via,
how about throwing some swag at him on the free-agent market?

Your thoughts everyone?

by Sneps-ish on Jun 8, 2009 4:17 PM PDT reply actions  

Even after what I replied to karina, I would love to see Beauchemin here. I have been a fan of his since Burke (?) raped Columbus to get him outta Columbus (for Fedorov).

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 8, 2009 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Beauchemin is slow and not as effective in the newer faster NHL. Don’t need him, I would rather pick up Tom Gilbert type. Smooth skater with good offensive upside, we don’t need more muckers. Bieksa and Mitchell are both better than Beauchemin.

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Allow me to debate-
The following slow-footed defencemen are in the Stanley Cup Finals:
Scuderi, Gill, and Chelios(i know, i know). Also, something called “Brett Lebda” plays for the Red Wings, but I’ve never seen it. Must be a misprint.

How helpful would it be to have someone on the Canucks with an honest-to-God
recent championship and some playoff savy as Chicago was bearing down on them last month?

by Sneps-ish on Jun 9, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m happy no one is trotting out Nieds. Honestly he doesn’t belong here.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Jun 8, 2009 4:49 PM PDT reply actions  

Nieds works in theory if the following took place:

-One year with a option for a second. Otherwise we could have a damned season-long retirement party on our hands.
Hell, why don’t we go out and get Burnaby Joe while we’re at it?
Regular season? Regular shmeason!

-Home-town discount (unlikely)

-Less minutes/responsiblity during the regular season to ramp him up
for the postseason, and give Edler room to breathe (unlikely)

-The C stays in the crease, unless Roberto wants to pass it on.(unlikely)

-He runs a mini-camp for the D in the minors. Such lessons as ‘tape-to-tape passes",
“play the man, not the puck”, “finish your hits”, "guess Keane’s age"
and “here comes Malkin, refrain from defecating in shorts” could prove useful.

It would indeed look wrong for Niedermayer to be in a Canucks jersey, like the Messier debacle and the brief suspension of my belief that Sundin’s name has no business on a Stanley Cup.
Meanwhile, Beauchemin’s a ninja at the right price, a fine top 4 guy.
I’m cool with Salo waiving his NTC for the right deal
(Get Tampa on speed-dial before the draft, and send Oren Koules pot brownies
for incentive).
Ah, Tampa, comedy gold.

by Sneps-ish on Jun 8, 2009 5:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Haha! Funny shit! I think it all depends on the Twins. If they sign, we’ll have less moolah, but have almost all of our top 2 lines in tact. If they don’t re-sign, it’s whole new ball game.

-Sakic would never sign here. Only in Colorado. Even so, the Avs are in trouble. I think Joe may retire.

- Niedermayer fits here for all the right reasons except money. But Gillis has already stated that he tried to get Jaybo, so he seems willing to dish out the money.

-Remember, the only way Gillis will keep Luongo here is if the team is a contender after this coming season. So he is going to have to play his cards right starting now.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 8, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gillis should pot brownie everyone. C’mon, use BC to your advantage ace.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Jun 8, 2009 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah, a body stone. Here’s your pen….

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 9, 2009 8:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Still Holding Out...

…For M.A. Bergeron.

The guy’s a pure offensive defenseman, a quick mover and good passer. He’s also gonna be cheaper than a bunch of the other options, since he’s all of 5’9" if measured while wearing his skates, and we already have big crease-clearers.

As for the draft, I wouldn’t mind if Ellis was available if Rundblad is gone. He might take a bit longer to develop, but even so.

by Thursday on Jun 9, 2009 7:35 PM PDT reply actions  

NOOOOOO!!!!!!! When the Oilers give up on a player, you know he ain’t gonna cut it. Every player in there organization is pencilled into being one of the “new” boys on the bus.

Bergeron is brutal, and AV would have him in the doghouse in about 3 minutes.

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 8:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Bergeron isn’t even close to “brutal”, and provides something Vancouver doesn’t have for (relatively) little cost. The guy got 14 goals on G-Ded Minnisota, for crying out loud! While at the same time being a plus-five. I don’t give a rat’s ass what happened in Edmonton: the fans there treat their players as well as Vancouver treats their goaltenders.

We’ve got the giants, and even for his size he’s not particularly fragile. We need to up the points, including getting the puck out of the zone. This he can do, and quite well at that.

by Thursday on Jun 9, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

He’s a decent offensive guy, but if he pots 15 goals and 35 assists, but is on the ice for 70 against. It won’t matter. He is a terrible defenceman, and watchin Edler and Bieksa take turns being terrible is enough for me.
Trust me, Bergeron would not be a good fit. He wasnt good enough for the sadsack Oilers, Islanders and apparently now Minny. I’ll take a pass.

by Nuckels on Jun 9, 2009 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is something to be said about a young guiy getting moved that often. He must be a cancer…or a shitbag

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 10, 2009 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

What year was that? Two years ago with that powerhouse Islanders team? They tried using him as a first pair player, and that’s not gonna work. The guy is a power-play quarterback, and Vancouver can use him 10-12 a night. The Oilers also tried using him as if he were another Housley: they fell in love with his offence and ignored the rest.

He’s fast (which the ‘Nucks D most certainly is not), has a hard shot and is a UFA. ’Course, I’m a little biased because I loathe coaches who use forwards on the point of the PP…

Zanstorm may have a point about personality clashes, but if that’s the case then Brent Ashton must have been a total douche. 8)

by Thursday on Jun 12, 2009 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just for fun

Here’s a list of pending defensemen UFA’s and their salary (christ Aucoin is a rip off)

Scott Niedermayer – $6,750,000
Mathieu Schneider – $5,750,000
Sergei Zubov – $5,350,000
Rob Blake – $5,000,000
Jay Bouwmeester - $4,875,000
Adrian Aucoin – $4,000,000
Derek Morris – $3,950,000
Derian Hatcher – $3,500,000
Mattias Ohlund – $3,500,000
Christian Backman – $3,400,000
Jaroslav Spacek – $3,300,000
Filip Kuba – $3,000,000
Nick Boynton – $2,950,000
Niclas Havelid – $2,900,000
Greg de Vries – $2,750,000
Philippe Boucher – $2,500,000
Kyle McLaren – $2,500,000
Darryl Sydor – $2,500,000
Rhett Warrener – $2,500,000
Karlis Skrastins – $2,400,000
Denis Gauthier – $2,200,000
Hal Gill – $2,100,000
Dmitri Kalinin – $2,100,000
Paul Mara – $1,950,000
Michael Komisarek – $1,900,000
Martin Skoula – $1,900,000
Francis Bouillon – $1,875,000
Mathieu Dandenault – $1,750,000
Marc-Andre Bergeron – $1,691,000
Francois Beauchemin – $1,650,000
Anders Eriksson – $1,500,000
Jordan Leopold – $1,500,000
Andrew Alberts – $1,400,000
Marek Malik – $1,250,000
Sean O’Donnell – $1,250,000
Ken Klee – $1,250,000
Dennis Seidenberg – $1,200,000
Teppo Numminen – $1,100,000
Kurtis Foster – $1,025,000
Josef Melichar – $1,000,000
Ossi Vaananen – $1,000,000
David Tanabe – $900,000
Lasse Kukkonen – $900,000
Cory Murphy – $875,000
Bret Hedican – $870,500
Jassen Cullimore – $830,000
Steve Montador – $800,000
Andy Wozniewski – $775,000
Shane Hnidy – $760,000
Patrice Brisebois – $750,000
Chris Chelios – $750,000
Daniel Tjarnqvist – $750,000
Greg Zanon – $750,000
Robert Scuderi – $725,000
Ville Koistinen – $700,000
Mike Weaver – $700,000
Thomas Pock – $685,000

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Jun 10, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions  

shit man, you should make post with that list. Awesome.

My top 3 would be Niedermayer, Jaybo or Beauchemin for sure.
How about Chris Chelios? haha

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 10, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ya I forgot. My bad.

There’s some decent guys in there under the $2 million mark, including my fair Ossi. But even Mara, Komisarek, MAB, Beauchemin. Not bad at all.

I’d also take a flier on Scuderi just for his save last night.

'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.

by Yankee Canuck on Jun 10, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’d also take a flier on Scuderi just for his save last night.

haha, true that!

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 10, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I keep overlooking Paul Mara. Yeah, he’s good, but not a point producer. I thought we needed a puck mover.
Well, we could let OB go and take Mara. I’d be down with that as well.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 10, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’d have to think Aucoin is done at that salary.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 10, 2009 12:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Nucks Misconduct community! We scour the web to promptly bring you all of the Vancouver Canucks news when it happens in highly-opinionated fashion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Keith-magnuson-006272802_small
The Little Green Box
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
"How Do I Hate Thee? Let Me Count The Ways..

Recent FanPosts

Vancouver_canucks_logo_small
So the hockey "flu" has run its course
Small
Slumping Canucks Are Hottest Team in the NHL?
Knights-09_small
February 28/12 - Nucks at Yotes
Cimg0038_small
Nucks fans in Denver?
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote
Small
Whats that trade talk show during intermissions called?
Rnxbd00z_small
#EmbraceTheHate ; ASG Corporate Schmooze Edition
Stfulou_small
Rosterbation Time! Your Opinion On What Mike Gillis Needs To Do As The Trade Deadline Approaches

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Nucks Misconduct Store

Nmstore_thumb_medium
Your clothing sucks. Go fix it.

Canucks Stats

Stat

Forwards

Defense

Points

H. Sedin (52)

Edler (34)

Goals

D. Sedin (20)

Edler (7)

Assists

H. Sedin (41)

Edler (27)

Shots

D. Sedin (159)

Edler (131)

Hits

Lapierre (136)

Edler (97)

Blocked Shots

Kesler (38)

Edler (72)

ES TOI/G

H. Sedin (14.45)

Bieksa (17.75)

PP TOI/G

D. Sedin (3.56)

Edler (3.60)

PK TOI/G

Malhotra (2.63)

Hamhuis (3.08)

Corsi Rel QoC

Burrows (0.975)

Bieksa (0.951)

Zone Starts (OPCT)

D. Sedin (80%)
Malhotra (13%)

Edler (58%)
Tanev (36%)

Updated: January 22


Bartenders

Jasonmask_small Yankee Canuck

Stfulou_small Sean Zandberg

Keslerbomb2_small Kent Basky

Pub Regulars

Edlermirrorreversed_small missy

Rnxbd00z_small vancitydan

Img_8090_small nucksandpucks

Cameh_small camcharron

Screen_shot_2011-11-27_at_11 Jordan Clarke

Stanchion_logo_small The Stanchion

299352_525780999561_106000039_30560322_1772728798_n_small Ggooglyboogly

Bouncers

Colon_semi-colon3_small Semi_Colon