Matt Cooke Gets His Cup
This was the first Cup celebration in a long time I could watch without wanting to puke. A lot of it, obviously, has to do with the Pens. Malkin is the best player in the league. Guys like Fleury and Staal came of age under the bright lights. Say what you will about Crosby, but he delivered. Warriors like Guerin and Talbot showed their worth.
But the Canuck diehard in me kept watching for #24, Matt f'ing Cooke. Perhaps you never liked him as a Canuck, the fact he always seemed to take an extra stride to level a borderline legal hit. Or the fact he never fought or took painful penalities (though he has a lot of company in that category).
But he was a Vancouver Canuck for nine seasons, including his best year to date (42 points in 02-03). He filled in when Bertuzzi went down, he did this and quietly ran the Cooke Foundation for years. Better still, he dropped out of favor with Vigneault (shocker), was moved to play a few steps away from Ovechkin and then, this summer, took the place of former Canuck Ruutu as the agitator for the Pens. Good stuff.
Also, if you read the Cooke Foundation's web site right now, you'll note he dedicated a year's worth of donations to Luc Bourdon's memory. And speaking of Luc, a big congrats goes out to Kris Letang, Bourdon's buddy who missed most of the SCF last year to mourn Bourdon's passing and, this time around, gets his name on the Cup.
Congrats all around, but from a Vancouver mind, especially to these two guys.
Now, going forward, I hope to hell Gillis and Vigneault watched these finals and saw just how those teams competed. They both have a lot of work to do this summer, Gillis especially.
And it starts now.
0 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
So I guess the three steps to Cup success is as follows:
Step 1: Crosby, Malkin, Fleury, TALBOT
Step 2: ???
Step Three: Stanley Cup!
step2:
watching the winner skate on your ice with the cup
" Lord Stanley, etch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 13, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I think a team has to hang out in the NHL basement for 3-5 years, draft star players while your team is threatened to be sold / moved and within a few years it starts paying dividends.
That seems to be the case in Pitts.
dont make me post another pic
" Lord Stanley, etch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 13, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions
hha, hey man I’m serious. Pitts had to finish in the shitter for a while to get Malkin and Crosby
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 13, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I thought Crosby was considered the best player in the league and Malkin was third? And why does nobody like Crosby? I really need to move back to Canada so I can follow the NHL more.
While the rides on the Pain Train and Brock Mansion Party Yacht have been fun, I think its time I hop on the BakBakcycle.
Well, I don’t hate him, he’s slowly growing on me. But Malkin may be the best, IMO
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 13, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I think if you choose one guy to build a team around, you pick Crosby (then Malkin then Ovechkin).
While the rides on the Pain Train and Brock Mansion Party Yacht have been fun, I think its time I hop on the BakBakcycle.
by rollonubears on Jun 13, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I suppose, on the leadership quality, but apparently Malkin told his mates that he was going to kick ass in the playoffs back in April. He’s a dominant force. I think I’d almost take Malkin first.
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 13, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions
At the very least, Malkin was the best this year. He won the Art Ross and the Conn Smythe, and although I’d argue that without Crosby taking the majority of the hits he’d be a lot less than he is, as it stands it’s hard to say that statistically Malkin was anything but the best this year.
This coming from a guy who still likes the way that Crosby seems to think on a different plane than most of the superstars in the league. I really think Crosby is the long-term centrepiece of the team, but Malkin’s numbers were easily better this year!
Considering all the circumstances (5 seconds to go in game 7, the fact that it was against an all-time great, the fact that he dove out of nowhere to block it) that has to be one of the top 5 saves of all time, right?
While the rides on the Pain Train and Brock Mansion Party Yacht have been fun, I think its time I hop on the BakBakcycle.
Epic Stanley Cup Winning Save.
Shocked the hell out of me, I thought it was going in. Lidstrom had a third of the net to shoot at, and was denied.
Do you rank it as one of the top 5 best of all time?
While the rides on the Pain Train and Brock Mansion Party Yacht have been fun, I think its time I hop on the BakBakcycle.
by rollonubears on Jun 13, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
in penguins lore
its number one. followed closely by frank peterangilo’s glove save on stastny. but i dont know about all time. we have seen spectacular goalie play this entire playoffs. flower robbing jeff carter in game 2, varlamov robbing sid in the caps series, im sure theres a bunch of western conf saves i missed.
but with that being said the moment, whats on the line, the time left, and who had the puck its darn close
" Lord Stanley, etch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 13, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions
BTW Oldtime, that Mike Lange call was awesome wasn’t it? Nice sig.
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 13, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions
amazing call. its a wonder why they dont use him for the announcer calls in the ea nhl series. one of the best there has ever been
" Lord Stanley, etch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 14, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions
For sure!
Oh he beat him like a rented mule!
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 14, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
the great thing
about mike lange is every once in a while, he forgets he supposed to be non-partisan. game 7 he was clearly a fan, ripping the refs several times on non calls for both teams. then you have the goals and the final call of the game,.
" Lord Stanley, etch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 14, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh there are too many announcers who forget that. I just don’t like it when it’s blatantly obvious. Like when the opposing team scores the play by play guy sounds like his dog just died.
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 14, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
No, not really. Best-game-clinching save category maybe, but Kirk McLean has him beat by far.
Oh, and Khabibulin’s save with the Lightning in Game 7 of the Finals was better.
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 13, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions
I have finally come out of the cave known as the self imposed information delay. Being this was a game 7, I hid from everything until I finally got my copy and enjoyed the game in its entirety without spoilers. And what a game…
Good on Matt Cooke for getting his cup…but at the same time, I am a little sad that Hossa didn’t get his (hey, former Portland Winterhawk). And the ironies of ironies is…when Hossa played for the Memorial Cup Championship in 1998, he blew out his knee midway through the 3rd period and missed the remainder of the game…twist of fate would have Crosby do the same. Although Crosby was able to accept the trophy on his own two feet…back in the day, Hossa was handed the cup while strapped to an office chair and his leg sticking straight out in front of him.
But, while watching that 7th game and marvelling at the speed, power and the lack of mistakes of both teams, I couldn’t help but think, there is no f*ing way the Canucks could have kept up with that pace. Mistakes that were made, were immediately pounced upon (ie Talbot’s first goal). So, instead of Luongo finding his game when it counted, it was Fleury…sticking his neck in front of a Lidstrom wrist shot with precious few ticks left on the clock. Bobby Orr flying through the air to win the cup…and Fleury sticking his neck in front of that shot are indelible images. Bottom line…this was the most entertaining/exciting cup final I have watched since…well, 1994. The NHL is back.
What a terrific season…and the best part of it…the Canucks are now in first place of the division and have an equal shot of doing what Pittsburgh did yesterday.
You are so right in saying MG has a lot of work to do this summer. I think it was some form of mass psychosis that had a lot of fans (myself included) thinking the Canucks were poised for a run this year. The final was a truly inspiring series to watch and there is no way the Canucks, as constructed last season, could have raised their level to reach that of either Detroit or Pittsburgh.
I guess it begins with decision time on the Sedins. I think I heard that a formal offer is expected this coming week.
by DeafNotDumb on Jun 14, 2009 6:54 PM PDT reply actions
I still don’t agree with the whole “Canucks couldn’t play to Detroit or Pittsburgh’s level”
History has shown that certain teams that bond together and play 100% as a team can surprise anyone. I can think of several examples. Calgary making the Finals a few years ago, the Oilers a few years ago, the Panthers of 1996 to name a few. Sure, those teams didn’t win the Cup those years, but they defied all odds to get there.
In the dead puck era it was somewhat easier for a team like the Panthers to trap their way to the finals. I doubt that Panthers team even makes the playoffs, post-lockout. This a whole new era based on speed and skill. Given the pace and compete level you saw from Detroit and Pittsburgh in the 2009 finals, do you legitimately feel the Canucks could have won four out of seven games by playing at that level? I mean, they could not even match the Hawks level, for crying out loud. And honestly, the Red Wings made the Hawks look pretty pedestrian.
Canucks no doubt bonded as well as anyone this year, but that didn’t keep their D from being exposed as old and slow or their supposedly all world goalie from being ventilated.
by DeafNotDumb on Jun 14, 2009 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions
but that didn’t keep their D from being exposed as old and slow or their supposedly all world goalie from being ventilated.
The D was seemingly slow yes, but the defence shit the bed. It’s not as if they don’t have the talent. They just fucked up their assignments. So did Luongo.
Hey, you could be right, but I am saying that had Vancouver played a better team game without the brainfarts then it would be a whole new ball game. You can’t deny possibility.
To me, you’re still underestimating the power of team chemistry and using too much hindsight by looking at a playoff tree at the end of it all.
There are so many x-factors involved in getting to that level. Letang’s huge goal in the second round (sorry had to mention him!), Talbot’s two goals in game seven, Staal’s shorty. Crosby, Gonchar, Lidstrom and countless others all played injured (meanwhile Salo and Demitra dropped like flies). Possibility is one thing, but some of the key guys disappeared (Burrows and Kesler had 4 points in ten games for instance).
I can forgive the defense for blowing some assignments, but the forwards disappeared. Vancouver badly needs to retool with quality guys up front this summer. I’d much rather have a questionable bottom four on defense if I know there are three scoring lines. Not one with an old guy or a line of unemployment, but true legitimate scorers.
Luongo and the defense will work itself out. Even if he resigns the Sedins, Gillis needs to work on the forward lines badly.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on Jun 15, 2009 6:39 AM PDT up reply actions
I meant moving on from Luc :)
I’m with you on loading up the offence more. That’s where the Niedermayer or Jaybo argument comes in. If we do land one of those 2, they had better put up 60 points minimal otherwise piss on it, spend the money on forwards. But as you mentioned, Burrows and Kesler really bit it after round 1. That was 2 guys we were really counting on.
by Sean Zandberg on Jun 15, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions
I love Matt Cooke, he took the place of Ruutu, but played better in the oppositions zone than Ruutu, both are fan favorites either way. My desire for the pens to win the cup grew much more when Cooke told a Pittsburgh writer, I’ve lifted that cup so many times. That’s something as a fan gives you chills to hear an athlete speak that fondly of his sports greatest prize. The Cup is without question the most respected championship in all of sports. It’s tradition. It’s legacy. The passion it exudes from the players striving for it from North America to Europe from Minnesota to Massachusetts from Buffalo to Pittsburgh from Ontario, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador, British Columbia, Quebec, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island,Manitoba, New Brunswick and Saskatchewan. Everywhere in between. The Cup is signicant to Canadians when they turn 5. It is without a doubt the most repected championship. Come on, do you see football players getting their name on the Lombardi trophy, no .Although it doesn’t diminish it. People will see the cup and some of the greats names on there, that’s special.

by 























