A Game Four Fail Makes It A Three Game Series
I think Zanstorm is in parts unknown this morning so I'll take the recap. Javaball has a great recap as well in the fanpost section you should check out too.
Last night was about what we should have expected. The Hawks started the first a lot stronger than in game three. Coupled with an early and atrocious Bieksa penalty (FAIL!), Chicago was throwing everything at Luongo and he had to his normal amazing self to survive the opening ten minutes. Brouwer took a boarding call midway through and Vancouver made nothing of their power play until the final three seconds. Yet as the period grew on you could see the Hawks relent and the Canucks slowly pick up the pace.
The second period was an even split which is an apt phrase because that's exactly what Luongo had to do midway through to keep the Hawks off the board with one of his best saves of the game. Shortly thereafter, Ryp and Blackout made a mad dash into Chicago's zone, Ryp channeled his inner Bertuzzi with a beautiful spinorama to find Blackout who scored his first goal of the playoffs. It was around then you began to think the Canucks would steal the game.
The third period was more of the same. The Hawks defense started pinching and the ice was badly tilted in favor of Chicago but the Vancouver defense was removing the lanes and blocking shots left and right. Yet, with three minutes left, the moment finally came for Chicago: Mitchell made a poor clearing attempt (FAIL!), Bolland made a short pass to an open Havlat who threw his body into a wrister that finally solved Luongo. Puke. Heading to OT land.
Twice early on in the extra frame the Canucks could have ended it, the best being Daniel Sedin staring at an empty net with Khabby sprawled on the ice only to sail it high and wide (FAIL!). Instead the Hawks raced down and Bolland did what I wish so many Canucks would do sometimes: from the far boards he chucked it on net and hoped for the best. Lady luck was a Hawk fan because no one was on Ladd in front (FAIL!) who popped in his second of the playoffs and sent the United Center into a national anthem-esque tizzy.
Lost in all of this? Edler played a fantastic game, Johnson could not define "unsung hero" enough, Bieksa may be injured and Luongo stood tall again.
Overall this loss is far more tolerable then game two which was just a mess all around. Clearly, the Canucks hoped to steal game four by pretending it was 2006-07 all over again: trap first, offense second. They also seem to have forgot how far that style got them. Few teams are going to win when they can only muster 14 shots in regulation (that, for the record, is the worst shot total for a Vancouver playoff game in franchise history; see the Bieksa injury link). I can't find the scoring chances at the moment, but I suspect it was horribly tilted towards the Hawks as well.
The good news is that the Vancouver still forced the Hawks to play almost perfectly and, with some puck luck, they did. Chicago doesn't have too many answers for Vancouver's defensive scheme (injuries not withstanding) but Vancouver doesn't have many answers for their own offense either. They can't have it both ways; sufficating Chicago in the neutral zone and then waiting for a defensive miscue on their end to be the catalyst for all of their offensive rushes.
As GZ Expat said in the thread, "they played not to lose, rather than to win." Damn straight.
Saturday begins the best of three. Most fans thought this was going six or seven. Good on ya. Let's see how the Canucks respond.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's been a hell of a series already.
There hasn’t been any game that wasn’t fun to watch, and that alone makes me happy. I’d be happier if the Canucks could finally win a Stanley Cup (and thus become the first team I’ve rooted for to EVER win any championship of any sort ever), but an excellent six/seven game series makes a fine consolation prize.
Of course I’m greedy, so I want both.
Too early for consolation prizes!
Canucks aren’t out of this by a long shot. For here on in though they just can’t sit back like they did in game four. They need to create opportunities, not wait for mistakes. If they bothered doing that in the third period last night alone, this series would be 3-1.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions
As I said.
I want both. A good series and a Stanley Cup.
I also want Veronica Mars and Arrested Development back. And I want a pony.
The difference is we’ve already gotten a good series and still have a shot at the cup. =O
Look upon my 62% faceoff win rate, ye mortals, and despair!
I would also like Arrested Development back. I’ll swap Keira Knightley for the pony.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions
I prefer Eva Green to Keira.
But I have a thing for French lasses.
Look upon my 62% faceoff win rate, ye mortals, and despair!
I saw Domino and haven’t been the same since.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions
I couldn’t believe they were playing like that. I mean we were completely shutting them down, and we ALMOST stole it, but how can you be content playing defence only in a one goal game?? We needed to go for the insurence goal in the third. We didn’t, and we paid the price for it. Dissapointing but hopefully a lesson learned.
Burrows + Canucks = Stanley Cup!
I don't think that they tried to win the game 1-0
The appearance that they sat on the 1-0 lead is a result of the team not being sharp offensively. Once you are not sharp and give up the puck in their attack, the most logically thing to do is to defend well and they did that. It’s just like in game 4 that they were not very good in the offensive zone and missed passes and shots more often than they usually do.
This loss made me physically ill (or was it the jack & cokes?). Regardless of ill-concieved strategies or unfortunate puck bounces, we were roughly two and a half minutes away from a 3-1 series lead. This kind of shit makes me wish I could reduce it to an irrational belief in a god who i was convinced was against my teams, just so I could shout to the thin air, “Fuck you, you sadistic sack of fuck! I piss on your omnipotence!”. Alas, I await game 5 with an uneasy mixture of belief, apprehension, and vitriol.
"Your best better get a hell of a lot fucking better or you're gonna feel a hell of a lot fucking worse."
A New Hope
FWIW, I saw flashes of puck-carrying brilliance from Sundin last night…almost shades of Lemieux. Canucks will desperately need another offensive threat, as Kesler seems to have a pretty huge target on his back.
No you’re right. That one breakaway he had I believe in the first was shocking. If only this was a season or two ago when he had the legs and the finish.
After last night, I think Rypien deserves more icetime. He’s a wildcard that, if composed, can be another Burrows if we get him the icetime.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Absolutely. Kesler also has hand of stone right now too. Sundin looked good. He could shoot more often. That wouldn’t hurt
by Sean Zandberg on May 8, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm not sure about Rypien
just because of one goal. I do remember his line is the one that Chicago is most able to hammer into the offensive zone. Even the goal came after the line were hammered in defensive zone (and an icing call if not mistaken). All series long, I noticed the Hawks had the most success against that line in terms of generating scoring chances and maintaining possession.
It’s not that one goal. He’s been injured most of the year, but when he played at the end he was on a mission. He’s better then a fourth liner which is where Burrows used to be. They’re both very similar and, in a tight series like this, he’s a valuable wildcard IMO.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions
A lot of fourth liners didn't become Burrows
who really needs to step up his game. The fourth line as it was yesterday couldn’t handle more minutes as they were not able to spend much time in the offensive zone. I don’t know, maybe give Rypien some ice time on another line as Burrows continues to struggle in generating any offense. If I were the coach, I would think about putting Bernier with the twins on some shifts. Burrows would then play some shifts on the third line and maybe Rypien too.
Throwing Kesler and Burrows together again isn’t a bad idea at all.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
I think it only happens if the Canucks
play against a one-line team, then Kesler and Burrows should shadow that line.
Hey
Keep playing the dumb trap! If you keep doing it, you’ll score as many goals as the Minnesota Wild do, and the Hawks will find a way around it.
The dumb trap put you in the hole and you JUST got your way out of it last night.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions
So close….so close. 2 minutes away from praising the trap if we would have won.
by Sean Zandberg on May 8, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Just had to....
O Canada
No Cups since ‘93
Vancouver as champs is also not to be
Whether Luongo’s hot or the twins can score
Or even with the trap
From Chicago, O Canada
The Hawks will stop you once more
God keep your land full of killer weed
O Canada maybe next year for thee
O Canada maybe next year for thee
by Return of the Roar on May 8, 2009 10:16 AM PDT reply actions
1961 was a long time ago too
Series ain’t over Shakespeare.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions
However,
Sixteen years is a long time for an entire nation’s teams to get just one cup.
This has been a great series.
by Return of the Roar on May 8, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions
58 years is a lifetime.
But it has been a good series. These guys hate each other, makes for good games.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 8, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
But it's never about the nations
The Stanley Cup is a tournament for individual clubs. How many Americans are there on the Blackhawks? The Canucks MVP is an American that I know.
Hawks have 5 Americans (3 from the same area in Wisconsin), 20 Candians, 2 Swedes, a Russian, A Czech, and a French-five-hole
by runningquicklynowhere on May 8, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Huet is the French-five-hole. Hate him and the soft goals he gives up with his technically flawed goofy style.
by runningquicklynowhere on May 8, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Good Luck
Hey best of luck to you guys in this 3 game series! Im a huge hawks fan and honestly couldn’t have hoped for a better series. This second round of the playoffs is looking to be some of the best match-ups we as hockey fans could of hoped to see… with all of these series possibly going to game 7! Whatever happens going into the next round wether its us or you guys! As long as SOMEONE takes out Detroit I’m happy! Again Good Luck and after this is all over have a beer on us hawks fans! lol
Well you are a good sport. Appreciated.
I’ll be honest with you, if the Hawks take out the Canucks I actually will be cheering for them the rest of the way. I’ve liked the Hawks since the Esposito days.
by Sean Zandberg on May 8, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
While I agree SharpFTW10 is a good sport and appreciate that too, I don’t think you should be talking about cheering another team when the Canucks still have a chance of winning the big prize.
My head hurts
It’s after 1:00 and I still feel like a bucket of smashed assholes.
This series is going to be the death of my liver.
I feel surprisingly well. I think my liver has become immune.
by Sean Zandberg on May 8, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Just take it out back and shoot it now, that way it won’t give you any trouble later
by rsm on May 8, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions

by 















