Where Have You Gone, Bobby Lou?
"Where have you gone, Bobby Lou
A nation turns its worrisome eyes to you.
What's that you do, Mr Vigneault
Salo left and the defense blew."
The Worrisome Pattern
The Hawks are not the only team to come back from 2-0 deficit against Luongo and the Canucks in the playoffs. St Louis scored two unanswered goals to erase a 2-0 deficit in the 2nd period in Game 4 of the 1st round series, and they would have taken the lead if their third goal in the period had not been disallowed. They also beat Luongo on another shot, which was blocked by Edler's skate at the goal-line.
The Canucks swept the Blues. But, that game shows how vulnerable Luongo and the defense without Salo are when the opposing team generates a big rush and crashes the net.
The worrisome pattern repeats itself in the 2nd round against the Hawks, whose offense has more depth than the Blues. The Canucks blew a 3-goal lead in Game 1 but escaped with a late game-winning goal by Salo. They built a 2-goal lead in Game 2, but after Salo left the game due to injury, they were "whipped" by the Hawks.
Where Have you Gone, Bobby Lou?
I'm worried that Luongo may be off his game at this point. The Hawks seem to have cracked him in the first two games. They're also trying to "get into his head'. Will he be able to find power from within and bounce back.?
What's that you do, Mr Vigneault?
The Canucks believe their defense is one of the best in the league. But with Salo missing, Vigneault juggled all the defense pairs and the results were dismal. When the players are forced to play out of their comfort zone, they tend to make more mistakes. Perhaps Vigneault should let someone take Salo's spot and keep the other defense pairs intact.
I have faith in the Canucks, though that faith is being sorely tested right now. The Hawks have speed and skill, but there are ways to neutralize speed. The Canucks cannot let the Hawks dictate the game, they have to play their style of game, and play to their own strengths.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvhG6T3E9kI
Calm down, he’s still fine. The breakdown last game was the whole team, not just Luongo. Like in my last post, none of the teams that swept did well in game two.
A team breakdown is more worrisome than Luongo having a bad day
After the breakdown in Game 1, the Canucks vowed to tighten up, and yet they had more breakdowns in Game 2. Even Luongo’s great save was after he made a mistake himself.
The Canucks have to play better as a team. Stop blaming the refs, bad luck, or even each other. They have to win in Chicago. There is no other way around it.
I think most can agree they have to play better as a team. Penalties, stretch passes, looking for the pass and not the shot, not getting in front of Khabby and causing as much of a mess as they are doing to Luongo…everything. They need to get back to the basics that got them this far.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
by Yankee Canuck on May 4, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions
As a group, the D-corps played very well against STL…hence, the puck that bounces off Edler’s skate. If Edler wasn’t playing well, he would have never been in that position to make the play.
I think Viggy put it best…Chicago turned up the heat and the D didn’t respond properly.
I look at it this way…remember ‘07? All we worried about was who the f* was gonna score a goal. In those playoffs it was Trevor Linden, of all people, that was bailing the team out time and again. This year, we aren’t having those discussions at all…rather, its about the D. And this is a team built on D with some of the best in the league on the blue line.
Talk to me later if the Canucks are down 3-1 and have been blown out of the two Chicago games and Luongo is sitting on the bench in favor of LaBabs. At that point, I’ll know we are f*ed.
Series tied 1-1…it takes 4 to win. Relax and enjoy the ride.

by 


















