All The Little Things
During the 6-1 drubbing by the Blues, John Garrett commented that the Canucks weren't doing the little things very well, and it was costing them in games. Over the recent losing skid, some of those little things have become more obvious. Let's review.
Offensively:
1) breakouts. Timing and accuracy have suffered. Too often of late the Canucks have been content to simply clear the zone rather than attempting a break out. While this is the safe play, lately it has been the norm, where a flip dump to center is given even in the absence of fore checking pressure. When a breakout pass has been attempted, the result has often been a suicide pass in the skates, or in a crowd, a pass to the other team, or a pass too far ahead to be recovered. I have to wonder how much the constant line juggling is affecting the player's timing and ability to anticipate each others on-ice positioning.
2) On a team featuring some players with really good wheels (Kesler, Raymond, Burrows), the Canucks have been hitting the opposing blue line at sub light speed. One annoying result of this has been the trend to crack the line, pull up, and attempt to hit the late man coming in. This play, if successful, means that the opposition's backcheckers have a chance to catch up, and the late guy now has a crowd in front of the net. If unsuccessful, it results in a fast break out and often a goal in the other direction (Samuelson, Sedin). Once in deep, the Canucks fore checkers (with the notable exception of Kesler and Pettinger) are too often outworked or out muscled for the puck.
Especially painful here has been the play of Burrows, who for much of the season has been spending far too much time on the ice (where he's been dumped by opposing D-men).
Defensively:
1) position, position, position. Like the previous 3 game slide, There has been no problem getting back in time. The issue has been one of what to do when they get there. Lately, the tendency has been to back in too far, and to let the opposing forwards get into a position where their bodies block the defense from getting to the opposition's sticks. One by product of this has been an increase in reaching penalties as out of position defenders try to take a short cut to the puck. This was improved upon in the Detroit game, but still needs some work.
2) a little help here.... With the exception of Johnson, Pettinger, and Kesler, too few of the forwards are blocking shots from the point (perhaps because they've backed in too far in the first place). Shots from the point are not generally a threat, except when the defenders are out of position, and tip ins or rebounds result.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow.
You are very observant and analytical. Very well said!
Personally, I hate seeing Kesler blocking shots. I know it’s gutsy, but we can’t afford to lose him.
AV’s line-juggling will always come under scrutiny. I’m sure it does mess with the players’ ability to jive with newbs on different nights, but I still think he’s doing the right thing by shuffling the deck while the team is losing. At least Wellwood got a chance to put up numbers last night by playing in the top 6. You could see him being more aggressive offensively at least.
He shuffles the deck way way too much
No way anybody can get in sync and anticipate the flow like that, constat guessing = constant chaos.
Yeah, I think he does it too much too. I think there would be a lot less of it if both Dank and Grabner weren’t injured.
by Sean Zandberg on Nov 13, 2009 10:16 PM PST up reply actions
Dooubt it
he’s been doing it as long as he’s been in Van.
He doesn’t use logic to create sensible combinations, he just guesses, and when one guess fails, he’s got plenty more.
Well he can’t be completely guessing. He watches them play at practice as well and makes a 100% logical decision. :)
I thought the decision to play Wellwood on line 2 was correct. He knew it would kickstart Woody’s offensive game, which it did (even tho he had zero points or shots). I thought the team, with the new juggled lines played a good game but couldn’t finish. We shall see tonight if the juggle act works because he’s keeping the same lines in tact.
by Sean Zandberg on Nov 14, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions
Well he gets another shot tonight. Let’s see what happens.
by Sean Zandberg on Nov 14, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions
Success?
Not sure I would call it that, but if you want to yeah there was def some luck there, and some players taking a step forward, but I don’t think AV gets the credit for that.
Very good analysis
This year Burrow is a mystery to me. How could he be so good last year and have such a fall off this year. What are the one or two things you think you could do to improve his play?
So if I sum up this post – a very good one, I second Sean’s praise – it’s that, emotionally, the Canucks are playing with too much caution and not enough aggression. I’m not talking about toughness, I mean having a “take it down the other guy’s gut” attitude towards the plays they choose to make.
This can be done while still playing sound hockey, but nonetheless on occasion will cost … e.g. intercepted outlet passes in their own zone, some of which will end up in their own net. But the alternative is death by a thousand cuts, as in the current road trip.
























