"There are certainly some issues that the league needs to take control off when players' names are being thrown around. You're talking about lives and families and those things need to be kept confidential when you may be discussing a transaction of some type. There was a mention of player's names, which was very upsetting for them, and it doesn't make me feel very good."
11 months ago
Sean Zandberg
5 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
If Gillisgan
is so concerned about it, why is he publicly giving credibility to something that was no more than rumour without him doing so?
He’s basically just come out and said “yes we did try to trade those players, why did you have to tell?”.
Yeah, that is more or less what I’m getting out of it too.
by Sean Zandberg on Oct 6, 2009 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Well that’s what I thought it was originally about, but obviously not. He’s talking about transactions, not poaching.
by Sean Zandberg on Oct 6, 2009 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Nucks Misconduct
Related FanShots on Nucks Misconduct
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
Follow The Misconduct
 |
 |
In Association With
Latest Puck Daddy - NHL from Yahoo! Sports
- Montreal's Price talks new 2-year contract, expectations post-Halak
- Donald Fehr aware of Kovalchuk drama, mum on everything else
- Puck Headlines: Savard's agent rants on Bettman; Halak in Montreal
- Boudreau, Crawford placed on the coaching hot seat
- NHL 2010-11 Season Preview: Wrestling with Atlanta Thrashers
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
