Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

Are the Ducks the new 'model' team?

TSN's Bob McKenzie wrote an interesting piece on Thursday:
While the Buffalo Sabres appeared to be the 'model' post-lockout NHL franchise, teams are now going to try to emulate the Anaheim Ducks.
While the Ottawa Senators were able to outmuscle the rest of their Eastern Conference counterparts, they ran into a brick wall in the Finals. The Ducks simply had too many big, strong and skilled players for the Senators to deal with. Not only are the Ducks are loaded with big, strong skilled players, they also have a lot of youngsters who will benefit greatly from this experience. Players like Penner, Perry and Getzlaf had breakout campaigns and franchises around the league will be looking for players just like them to build their teams around.
I don't like where that article is heading. How much does size really matter? Sure, the Ducks used their size to intimidate Ottawa, and it was quite beneficial overall. But I wouldn't say that the Sabres are less of a 'model' team. Even the Sabres' failure this postseason cannot be blamed on the smaller size of their team, can it?
When it comes down to it, it takes 19 guys on the ice to buy into their coach's system and to play with the heart and desire that it takes to win a championship. That is not what we saw from Buffalo or Detroit in the semi-finals, and it is definitely not what we saw from Ottawa in the Finals.
While Anaheim's size did frustrate the Sens, there were too many holes in the machine that was Ottawa, starting with Ray Emery and it worked it's way out from there. How can Anaheim's roster be the new template when the only Sens players you can truly praise for their performance in the Finals were Vermette, McAmmond, Fisher, Neil, and a couple others. Ottawa did not get the complete team performance that was necessary to draw the series out any longer than 5 games.
So I am disagreeing with McKenzie in general. Buffalo's team on paper was terrific the way it was. They just couldn't get it together when it mattered the most.

Do you agree or disagree?

T Tags:

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I gotta agree with Bob there, while the Sabres had outstanding speed and skill, they lacked the size required to force the issue. Both their defenders and forwards were just too easily pushed around. They needed at least some skilled big players to clear space for their speedy small guys. And they needed a stud d-man who can shove people off the puck and play with an edge like the prongster.

I thought at the start of the year Buffalo would be a great team to watch, but too small and soft to make it all the way.

To reverse this the league would have to do something like make the rink size bigger like europe, to give the smaller guys more room to zip around in without being bodied by the big dudes!

by James on Jun 9, 2007 10:58 AM PDT reply actions  

I guess I'm not translating Buffalo's woes to their lack of size. They were not playing all that well against the Rangers in round 2 either but still had enough to beat them.
Had the Wings had guys like Bert, Lang, Samuelsson, Draper, and Maltby rolling, the Ducks would never have beat them.
To me it seems this opinion of modelling after the Ducks is formed in hindsight (?) when so may other things happened for them to win the cup in the first place.
Does that make any sense? I just woke up.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 9, 2007 1:10 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Muckler agrees:
''I don't believe there will be too many changes,'' said Muckler. ''I think we have the ability to get better from within and everyone just needs to play a little better.''

Or, a LOT better.

by Sean Zandberg on Jun 9, 2007 2:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Nucks Misconduct community! We scour the web to promptly bring you all of the Vancouver Canucks news when it happens in highly-opinionated fashion.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Keith-magnuson-006272802_small
The Little Green Box
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
"How Do I Hate Thee? Let Me Count The Ways..
Stfulou_small
Rosterbation Time! Your Opinion On What Mike Gillis Needs To Do As The Trade Deadline Approaches

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Nucks Misconduct Store

Nmstore_thumb_medium
Your clothing sucks. Go fix it.

Canucks Stats

Stat

Forwards

Defense

Points

H. Sedin (52)

Edler (34)

Goals

D. Sedin (20)

Edler (7)

Assists

H. Sedin (41)

Edler (27)

Shots

D. Sedin (159)

Edler (131)

Hits

Lapierre (136)

Edler (97)

Blocked Shots

Kesler (38)

Edler (72)

ES TOI/G

H. Sedin (14.45)

Bieksa (17.75)

PP TOI/G

D. Sedin (3.56)

Edler (3.60)

PK TOI/G

Malhotra (2.63)

Hamhuis (3.08)

Corsi Rel QoC

Burrows (0.975)

Bieksa (0.951)

Zone Starts (OPCT)

D. Sedin (80%)
Malhotra (13%)

Edler (58%)
Tanev (36%)

Updated: January 22


Bartenders

Jasonmask_small Yankee Canuck

Stfulou_small Sean Zandberg

Keslerbomb2_small Kent Basky

Pub Regulars

Edlermirrorreversed_small missy

Rnxbd00z_small vancitydan

Img_8090_small nucksandpucks

Cameh_small camcharron

Screen_shot_2011-11-27_at_11 Jordan Clarke

Stanchion_logo_small The Stanchion

299352_525780999561_106000039_30560322_1772728798_n_small Ggooglyboogly

Bouncers

Colon_semi-colon3_small Semi_Colon